Quantcast
  • Register
PhysicsOverflow is a next-generation academic platform for physicists and astronomers, including a community peer review system and a postgraduate-level discussion forum analogous to MathOverflow.

Welcome to PhysicsOverflow! PhysicsOverflow is an open platform for community peer review and graduate-level Physics discussion.

Please help promote PhysicsOverflow ads elsewhere if you like it.

News

New printer friendly PO pages!

Migration to Bielefeld University was successful!

Please vote for this year's PhysicsOverflow ads!

Please do help out in categorising submissions. Submit a paper to PhysicsOverflow!

... see more

Tools for paper authors

Submit paper
Claim Paper Authorship

Tools for SE users

Search User
Reclaim SE Account
Request Account Merger
Nativise imported posts
Claim post (deleted users)
Import SE post

Users whose questions have been imported from Physics Stack Exchange, Theoretical Physics Stack Exchange, or any other Stack Exchange site are kindly requested to reclaim their account and not to register as a new user.

Public \(\beta\) tools

Report a bug with a feature
Request a new functionality
404 page design
Send feedback

Attributions

(propose a free ad)

Site Statistics

156 submissions , 130 unreviewed
4,059 questions , 1,467 unanswered
4,947 answers , 21,060 comments
1,470 users with positive rep
547 active unimported users
More ...

  Intuition for when the replica trick should work and why it works

+ 7 like - 0 dislike
70 views

I am a graduate student in mathematics working in probability (without a very good background in physics honestly) and I've started to see arguments based on computations derived from the replica trick. I understand that it is non-rigorous but it appears that a decent number of the solutions one obtains using this trick can be made rigorous by other (often fairly involved) methods. I would like to work on developing a better heuristic approach to problems, so I would like to understand when I can reasonably expect this type of argument to give reasonably accurate predictions. Perhaps more importantly for me, is there a nice characterization of physical situations when it is clear that this trick should fail?

Links to introductory papers, worked elementary examples, or hand waiving arguments about why this should work and when it shouldn't would all be appreciated. I've glanced at the first few PDFs that appear when you google "Replica Trick" so no need to link me to lmgtfy :)

This post imported from StackExchange Physics at 2017-02-05 11:31 (UTC), posted by SE-user Chris Janjigian
asked Oct 3, 2012 in Resources and References by Chris Janjigian (0 points) [ no revision ]
retagged Feb 5, 2017

Your answer

Please use answers only to (at least partly) answer questions. To comment, discuss, or ask for clarification, leave a comment instead.
To mask links under text, please type your text, highlight it, and click the "link" button. You can then enter your link URL.
Please consult the FAQ for as to how to format your post.
This is the answer box; if you want to write a comment instead, please use the 'add comment' button.
Live preview (may slow down editor)   Preview
Your name to display (optional):
Privacy: Your email address will only be used for sending these notifications.
Anti-spam verification:
If you are a human please identify the position of the character covered by the symbol $\varnothing$ in the following word:
$\varnothing\hbar$ysicsOverflow
Then drag the red bullet below over the corresponding character of our banner. When you drop it there, the bullet changes to green (on slow internet connections after a few seconds).
To avoid this verification in future, please log in or register.




user contributions licensed under cc by-sa 3.0 with attribution required

Your rights
...