Quantcast
  • Register
PhysicsOverflow is a next-generation academic platform for physicists and astronomers, including a community peer review system and a postgraduate-level discussion forum analogous to MathOverflow.

Welcome to PhysicsOverflow! PhysicsOverflow is an open platform for community peer review and graduate-level Physics discussion.

Please help promote PhysicsOverflow ads elsewhere if you like it.

News

New printer friendly PO pages!

Migration to Bielefeld University was successful!

Please vote for this year's PhysicsOverflow ads!

Please do help out in categorising submissions. Submit a paper to PhysicsOverflow!

... see more

Tools for paper authors

Submit paper
Claim Paper Authorship

Tools for SE users

Search User
Reclaim SE Account
Request Account Merger
Nativise imported posts
Claim post (deleted users)
Import SE post

Users whose questions have been imported from Physics Stack Exchange, Theoretical Physics Stack Exchange, or any other Stack Exchange site are kindly requested to reclaim their account and not to register as a new user.

Public \(\beta\) tools

Report a bug with a feature
Request a new functionality
404 page design
Send feedback

Attributions

(propose a free ad)

Site Statistics

145 submissions , 122 unreviewed
3,930 questions , 1,398 unanswered
4,853 answers , 20,624 comments
1,470 users with positive rep
501 active unimported users
More ...

Have "backwards-compatible" states on local QFT algebras been studied?

+ 3 like - 0 dislike
42 views

There is a class of states on a local QFT algebra that are "backwards-compatible" in a natural sense I'll define below -- has this class been identified and studied? Any pointers would be hugely helpful in my research, and greatly appreciated!

Order the normal states of local von Neumann algebras by how "informative" they are, in terms of their support projections:

      $\gamma \leq \omega \iff$ range$(s_\gamma) \subseteq$ range$(s_\omega)$.

Note 1: $s_\gamma, s_\omega$ are computed in the respective algebras on which $\gamma, \omega$ are states; the algebras may be distinct, but so long as they act on the same Hilbert space, the ranges can be meaningfully compared.

Note 2: if $\omega$ is a normal state on $\mathcal{S}$ and $\mathcal{R} \subseteq \mathcal{S}$, then $\omega$ is $\leq$ ("at least as informative as") its restriction $\omega \upharpoonright \mathcal{R}$; the inequality may or may not be strict.

Note 3: we assume each local algebra $\mathcal{R}$ is type III and so has no pure normal states; thus for each normal state $\omega$ on $\mathcal{R}$, there exist others that are strictly $< \omega$.

Call normal states $\omega, \omega'$ "compatible in $\mathcal{R}$" if there exists a normal state $\tau$ on $\mathcal{R}$ such that $\tau \leq \omega$ and $\tau \leq \omega'$. (By Note 1, $\omega, \omega'$ need not be states on $\mathcal{R}$.)

When $\mathcal{R} \subseteq \mathcal{S}$ and $\omega$ is a normal state on $\mathcal{S}$, call $\omega$ "backwards-compatible to $\mathcal{R}$" if every normal state $\gamma$ on $\mathcal{R}$ satisfying $\gamma \leq (\omega \upharpoonright \mathcal{R})$ is compatible with $\omega$ in $\mathcal{S}$.

Now let $\mathcal{O}$ be the set of open regions of some spacetime, and let $\{ \mathcal{R}(O) : O \in \mathcal{O} \}$ be our "typical net of local algebras."

Call a normal state $\omega$ on $\mathcal{R}(O_1)$ "backwards-compatible" for our net if it is backwards-compatible to $\mathcal{R}(O_2)$ for every $O_2 \subseteq O_1$ in $\mathcal{O}$.

For a spacetime region to be in a backwards-compatible state means something like this: any measurement designed in any sub-region to get strictly more information about that sub-region, would put it in a state compatible with what is known about the larger region. This seems like an excellent property for a state to have!

Has anyone identified or studied backwards-compatible states (presumably using a different term)?

Has anyone proved that nontrivial examples exist in typical AQFT models? I can prove, using the "split inclusion" property of such models, that for distinct $O_1 \subseteq O_2$, there exists a normal state $\omega$ on $\mathcal{R}(O_2)$, backwards-compatible to $\mathcal{R}(O_1)$, such that $\omega < (\omega \upharpoonright \mathcal{R}(O_1))$ (strictly). But it seems harder to find $\omega$ having these properties towards *all* proper sub-regions of $\mathcal{R}(O_2)$ simultaneously.

asked Mar 9 in Theoretical Physics by DougM (15 points) [ no revision ]

Your answer

Please use answers only to (at least partly) answer questions. To comment, discuss, or ask for clarification, leave a comment instead.
To mask links under text, please type your text, highlight it, and click the "link" button. You can then enter your link URL.
Please consult the FAQ for as to how to format your post.
This is the answer box; if you want to write a comment instead, please use the 'add comment' button.
Live preview (may slow down editor)   Preview
Your name to display (optional):
Privacy: Your email address will only be used for sending these notifications.
Anti-spam verification:
If you are a human please identify the position of the character covered by the symbol $\varnothing$ in the following word:
p$\hbar$ysicsOve$\varnothing$flow
Then drag the red bullet below over the corresponding character of our banner. When you drop it there, the bullet changes to green (on slow internet connections after a few seconds).
To avoid this verification in future, please log in or register.




user contributions licensed under cc by-sa 3.0 with attribution required

Your rights
...