Quantcast
  • Register
PhysicsOverflow is a next-generation academic platform for physicists and astronomers, including a community peer review system and a postgraduate-level discussion forum analogous to MathOverflow.

Welcome to PhysicsOverflow! PhysicsOverflow is an open platform for community peer review and graduate-level Physics discussion.

Please help promote PhysicsOverflow ads elsewhere if you like it.

News

PO is now at the Physics Department of Bielefeld University!

New printer friendly PO pages!

Migration to Bielefeld University was successful!

Please vote for this year's PhysicsOverflow ads!

Please do help out in categorising submissions. Submit a paper to PhysicsOverflow!

... see more

Tools for paper authors

Submit paper
Claim Paper Authorship

Tools for SE users

Search User
Reclaim SE Account
Request Account Merger
Nativise imported posts
Claim post (deleted users)
Import SE post

Users whose questions have been imported from Physics Stack Exchange, Theoretical Physics Stack Exchange, or any other Stack Exchange site are kindly requested to reclaim their account and not to register as a new user.

Public \(\beta\) tools

Report a bug with a feature
Request a new functionality
404 page design
Send feedback

Attributions

(propose a free ad)

Site Statistics

205 submissions , 163 unreviewed
5,047 questions , 2,200 unanswered
5,345 answers , 22,709 comments
1,470 users with positive rep
816 active unimported users
More ...

  Is there a maximum number of fixed points that a QFT can have?

+ 3 like - 0 dislike
2205 views

I was wondering: is there a maximum number of (trivial and non-trivial) fixed points that a QFT can have (as a function of the space-time dimension and field content in the QFT)?

This post imported from StackExchange Physics at 2015-07-08 13:49 (UTC), posted by SE-user Jaswin
asked Jul 8, 2015 in Theoretical Physics by Jaswin (105 points) [ no revision ]
retagged Jul 8, 2015
Most voted comments show all comments

Oh sorry, that was the name of his talk. His paper is this one http://arxiv.org/abs/1503.01474

It depends on the precise definition of "a" QFT. For me, a QFT is a trajectory of the RG flow between two fixed points and so a theory has always two fixed points: one UV fixed point and one IR fixed point (which can be the same if the theory is scale invariant). To be more interesting, the question probably defines "a" QFT has a QFT depending of parameters i.e. a given subspace of the space of all effective theories, stable under the RG flows and the question is about the number of fixed points in this given subspace. Then the answer depends on the precise subspace considered. 

@40227,  I'm curious why this definition is particular appealing to you. It's mathematically quite possible that a flow can approach a fixed point, then gets repelled from the fixed point( a saddle fix point), then runs to the next fixed point, but gets repelled again when running nearby, and behaves like this over and over again. 

Jia Yiyang What you describe is perfectly possible and is not in contradiction with what I have written: passing near a fixed point is different from passing through a fixed point.

Note that it is possible to have fractures in RG flows: places where new (continuous or discrete) parameters become tunable and these are not necessarily at fixed points, so the picture of a "flow" as a simple curve can be misleading.

Most recent comments show all comments

@40227, I understand there's no contradiction, but you said

For me, a QFT is a trajectory of the RG flow between two fixed points and so a theory has always two fixed points

So I'm wondering why this special case of RG flow is particular preferable for a QFT.

@40227 I would be very interested in a answer along the second point of view you mentioned above, when considering the RG flow in different subspaces of parameter space.

Your answer

Please use answers only to (at least partly) answer questions. To comment, discuss, or ask for clarification, leave a comment instead.
To mask links under text, please type your text, highlight it, and click the "link" button. You can then enter your link URL.
Please consult the FAQ for as to how to format your post.
This is the answer box; if you want to write a comment instead, please use the 'add comment' button.
Live preview (may slow down editor)   Preview
Your name to display (optional):
Privacy: Your email address will only be used for sending these notifications.
Anti-spam verification:
If you are a human please identify the position of the character covered by the symbol $\varnothing$ in the following word:
p$\hbar$ysi$\varnothing$sOverflow
Then drag the red bullet below over the corresponding character of our banner. When you drop it there, the bullet changes to green (on slow internet connections after a few seconds).
Please complete the anti-spam verification




user contributions licensed under cc by-sa 3.0 with attribution required

Your rights
...