Welcome to PhysicsOverflow! PhysicsOverflow is an open platform for community peer review and graduate-level Physics discussion.

Please help promote PhysicsOverflow ads elsewhere if you like it.

New printer friendly PO pages!

Migration to Bielefeld University was successful!

Please vote for this year's PhysicsOverflow ads!

Please do help out in categorising submissions. Submit a paper to PhysicsOverflow!

... see more

(propose a free ad)

I was wondering: is there a maximum number of (trivial and non-trivial) fixed points that a QFT can have (as a function of the space-time dimension and field content in the QFT)?

Oh sorry, that was the name of his talk. His paper is this one http://arxiv.org/abs/1503.01474

It depends on the precise definition of "a" QFT. For me, a QFT is a trajectory of the RG flow between two fixed points and so a theory has always two fixed points: one UV fixed point and one IR fixed point (which can be the same if the theory is scale invariant). To be more interesting, the question probably defines "a" QFT has a QFT depending of parameters i.e. a given subspace of the space of all effective theories, stable under the RG flows and the question is about the number of fixed points in this given subspace. Then the answer depends on the precise subspace considered.

@40227, I'm curious why this definition is particular appealing to you. It's mathematically quite possible that a flow can approach a fixed point, then gets repelled from the fixed point( a saddle fix point), then runs to the next fixed point, but gets repelled again when running nearby, and behaves like this over and over again.

I think Gukov's ideas give a nice approach to this question. One needs to understand what sorts of manifolds can appear as theory space with what sorts of RG flow fields. For example, if the space of parameters is compact, then an infinite collection of fixed points needs to have an accumulation point...

Note that it is possible to have fractures in RG flows: places where new (continuous or discrete) parameters become tunable and these are not necessarily at fixed points, so the picture of a "flow" as a simple curve can be misleading.

@40227, I understand there's no contradiction, but you said

For me, a QFT is a trajectory of the RG flow between two fixed points and so a theory has always two fixed points

So I'm wondering why this special case of RG flow is particular preferable for a QFT.

@40227 I would be very interested in a answer along the second point of view you mentioned above, when considering the RG flow in different subspaces of parameter space.

user contributions licensed under cc by-sa 3.0 with attribution required