• Register
PhysicsOverflow is a next-generation academic platform for physicists and astronomers, including a community peer review system and a postgraduate-level discussion forum analogous to MathOverflow.

Welcome to PhysicsOverflow! PhysicsOverflow is an open platform for community peer review and graduate-level Physics discussion.

Please help promote PhysicsOverflow ads elsewhere if you like it.


PO is now at the Physics Department of Bielefeld University!

New printer friendly PO pages!

Migration to Bielefeld University was successful!

Please vote for this year's PhysicsOverflow ads!

Please do help out in categorising submissions. Submit a paper to PhysicsOverflow!

... see more

Tools for paper authors

Submit paper
Claim Paper Authorship

Tools for SE users

Search User
Reclaim SE Account
Request Account Merger
Nativise imported posts
Claim post (deleted users)
Import SE post

Users whose questions have been imported from Physics Stack Exchange, Theoretical Physics Stack Exchange, or any other Stack Exchange site are kindly requested to reclaim their account and not to register as a new user.

Public \(\beta\) tools

Report a bug with a feature
Request a new functionality
404 page design
Send feedback


(propose a free ad)

Site Statistics

205 submissions , 163 unreviewed
5,064 questions , 2,215 unanswered
5,347 answers , 22,734 comments
1,470 users with positive rep
818 active unimported users
More ...

  Theta-vacuum in the gauge field theory

+ 3 like - 0 dislike

Consider Yang-Mills theory (with possible including of fermions). It has a set $\{|n\rangle\}$ of vavua labeled by integer winding number $n$, defined as the Maurer-Cartan topological invariant: For the gauge element $g_{(n)}$ and corresponding unitary large gauge transformation $U(g_{(n)})$ we have
|n\rangle = U(g_{(n)})|0\rangle, \quad n = \frac{i}{24\pi^{2}}\int \limits_{S^{3}} d^{3}\theta \epsilon^{ijk}\text{tr}\big[ g_{(n)}\partial_{i}g_{(n)}^{-1}g_{(n)}\partial_{k}g_{(n)}^{-1}g\partial_{k}g_{(n)}^{-1}\big]
What is the most theory-independent argument that shows that the vacuum structure of the non-abelian gauge theory must correspond to the $\theta$-vacuum state
|\theta\rangle = \sum_{n = -\infty}^{\infty}e^{in\theta}|n\rangle?

Examples of arguments which are not complete as for me

Argument 1

Consider pure YM theory (without fermions). In order to argue why we have to use the $\theta$-vacuum as the ground state, people derive that the Hamiltonian $H$ is non-diagonal in the basis $\{|n\rangle\}$:
\langle n|H|m\rangle \simeq e^{-\frac{8\pi^{2}}{g^{2}}|n - m|}
alternatively, it is shown that vacuum **tunneling** is possible. This requires us to diagonalize the hamiltonian, and the $\theta$-vacuum basis is the diagonal basis.

Argument 2

The first argument, however, is valid only for pure Yang-Mills theory and breaks down when massless fermions are included, since massless fermions suppress the tunneling. People then use an argument based on the **cluster decomposition principle** (or CDP). A  detailed argument is shown here. People introduce the conserved operator
\tilde{Q}_{5} =\int d^{3}\mathbf r (J_{0,5} - 2K_{0}) ,
where $K_{0}$ is defined as
G_{\mu\nu,a}\tilde{G}^{\mu\nu}_{a} = 2\partial_{\mu}K^{\mu}.
By using this charge, one shows that the VEV of non-zero 2c chirality operator $B(\mathbf x)$ (i.e., $[\tilde{Q}_{5}, \mathbf B(\mathbf x)] = 2c \mathbf B(\mathbf x)$) show that the VEV
\langle n| B(\mathbf x)B^{\dagger}(0)|n\rangle
doesn't satisfy the CDP
\lim_{|\mathbf x| \to \infty}\langle n| B(\mathbf x)B^{\dagger}(0)|n\rangle = \lim_{|\mathbf x| \to \infty}\langle n|B(\mathbf x)|n\rangle \langle n|B(0)|n\rangle
The $\theta$-vacuum is the solution of this problem.

But  the details of this argument depend on the presence of fermions. More specifically, we introduce chirality and operates with the chirality operator $\tilde{Q}_{5}$.

What do I want?

I want some argument (possibly purely mathematical) which shows that we must choose the $\theta$-vacuum as the ground state of the YM theory (if it exists) independently of the precise content of the theory's fields (independent on the fact whether massless fermions are present).

Could You help?

asked Jan 22, 2017 in Theoretical Physics by NAME_XXX (1,060 points) [ revision history ]

I want some argument (possibly purely mathematical) which shows that we must choose the θ-vacuum as the ground state of the YM theory (if it exists) independently of the precise content of the theory's fields (independent on the fact whether massless fermions are present).

Is there a reason making you believe there exists one?

You can set it to zero. The term proportional to $\theta$ is a topological term and won't affect the equations of motion. This amounts into setting the second Chern class of the Yang-Mills bundle equal to zero. You can work with arbitrary $\theta$ as well which is better if you want to understand say magnetic-electric duality.  But in general really specify your theory you usually choose a Chern character $(r(E), c_1(E), ch_2(E))$. 

@conformak_gk, that's not OP's question, even with $\theta=0$ it is still a $\theta$-vacuum instead of a $|n\rangle$-vacuum, i.e. $\theta=0$ is still not a vacuum of CS charge eigenstate.

I second the first comment by @JiaYiyang : Why would an argument not depending on chiral fermions be expected to exist? A careful account with chiral fermions considered is in arxiv:0907.2522 and the authors stress (p. 3)

the interplay between the topology of the gauge group and the chiral transformations [...] gives rise to a non-trivial vacuum structure is clearly displayed under general assumptions.

Curiously, I was just this morning having a discussion about this with Eduardo Fradkin. We wondered if there is any evidence (beyond  Haldane's observation about $\theta0,\pi$ relating to integeger and half integer spin chains)  of the effect of $\theta$  on any physical system. In particlular is there any *non-handwaving*  calculation of  the renormalization group flow of $\theta$?

@MichaelStone I'm not an expert on this, but I think recently 1703.00501 showed $\theta=\pi$ QCD has a quite distinct phase structure compared to $\theta=0$ QCD. As for RG flow, I remember in $N=2$ SUSY people calculated the flow of the complex coupling $\tau=\frac{i\theta}{2\pi}+\frac{4\pi}{g^2}$, which should a fortiori give you the flow of $\theta$.

Your answer

Please use answers only to (at least partly) answer questions. To comment, discuss, or ask for clarification, leave a comment instead.
To mask links under text, please type your text, highlight it, and click the "link" button. You can then enter your link URL.
Please consult the FAQ for as to how to format your post.
This is the answer box; if you want to write a comment instead, please use the 'add comment' button.
Live preview (may slow down editor)   Preview
Your name to display (optional):
Privacy: Your email address will only be used for sending these notifications.
Anti-spam verification:
If you are a human please identify the position of the character covered by the symbol $\varnothing$ in the following word:
Then drag the red bullet below over the corresponding character of our banner. When you drop it there, the bullet changes to green (on slow internet connections after a few seconds).
Please complete the anti-spam verification

user contributions licensed under cc by-sa 3.0 with attribution required

Your rights