• Register
PhysicsOverflow is a next-generation academic platform for physicists and astronomers, including a community peer review system and a postgraduate-level discussion forum analogous to MathOverflow.

Welcome to PhysicsOverflow! PhysicsOverflow is an open platform for community peer review and graduate-level Physics discussion.

Please help promote PhysicsOverflow ads elsewhere if you like it.


PO is now at the Physics Department of Bielefeld University!

New printer friendly PO pages!

Migration to Bielefeld University was successful!

Please vote for this year's PhysicsOverflow ads!

Please do help out in categorising submissions. Submit a paper to PhysicsOverflow!

... see more

Tools for paper authors

Submit paper
Claim Paper Authorship

Tools for SE users

Search User
Reclaim SE Account
Request Account Merger
Nativise imported posts
Claim post (deleted users)
Import SE post

Users whose questions have been imported from Physics Stack Exchange, Theoretical Physics Stack Exchange, or any other Stack Exchange site are kindly requested to reclaim their account and not to register as a new user.

Public \(\beta\) tools

Report a bug with a feature
Request a new functionality
404 page design
Send feedback


(propose a free ad)

Site Statistics

205 submissions , 163 unreviewed
5,064 questions , 2,215 unanswered
5,347 answers , 22,741 comments
1,470 users with positive rep
818 active unimported users
More ...

  Subtleties in AdS$_2$/CFT$_1$

+ 3 like - 0 dislike

I was looking at few papers on AdS$_2$/CFT$_1$. It seems to me that this is not as well studied as the higher dimensional dualities (e.g, AdS$_3$/CFT$_2$ or AdS$_5$/CFT$_4$). Can someone summarize what the actual difficulties are. For example, I have some related questions in this setup.

  1. How to define a CFT$_1$? Is it just quantum mechanics with conformal invariance?

  2. How to define central charge of CFT$_1$? What will be its physical meaning (like degrees of freedom, anomaly or Casimir energy)?

  3. I came across the statement that AdS$_2$ is not stable by itself. One needs to have electric flux to make it stable. Why/how is it so? And if it is true then what is its analog in the dual CFT$_1$?

(If someone wishes to answer this, please feel free to discuss other subtleties related to AdS$_2$/CFT$_1$ .)

This post imported from StackExchange Physics at 2016-09-05 19:39 (UTC), posted by SE-user Physics Moron
asked Sep 5, 2016 in Theoretical Physics by Physics Moron (285 points) [ no revision ]

Could you please give references to one or two of the papers you had looked at?

Well, here is one : arxiv.org/abs/hep-th/9812073 Summarizing this paper briefly will be a great answer to my question actually. :-)

Your answer

Please use answers only to (at least partly) answer questions. To comment, discuss, or ask for clarification, leave a comment instead.
To mask links under text, please type your text, highlight it, and click the "link" button. You can then enter your link URL.
Please consult the FAQ for as to how to format your post.
This is the answer box; if you want to write a comment instead, please use the 'add comment' button.
Live preview (may slow down editor)   Preview
Your name to display (optional):
Privacy: Your email address will only be used for sending these notifications.
Anti-spam verification:
If you are a human please identify the position of the character covered by the symbol $\varnothing$ in the following word:
Then drag the red bullet below over the corresponding character of our banner. When you drop it there, the bullet changes to green (on slow internet connections after a few seconds).
Please complete the anti-spam verification

user contributions licensed under cc by-sa 3.0 with attribution required

Your rights