• Register
PhysicsOverflow is a next-generation academic platform for physicists and astronomers, including a community peer review system and a postgraduate-level discussion forum analogous to MathOverflow.

Welcome to PhysicsOverflow! PhysicsOverflow is an open platform for community peer review and graduate-level Physics discussion.

Please help promote PhysicsOverflow ads elsewhere if you like it.


PO is now at the Physics Department of Bielefeld University!

New printer friendly PO pages!

Migration to Bielefeld University was successful!

Please vote for this year's PhysicsOverflow ads!

Please do help out in categorising submissions. Submit a paper to PhysicsOverflow!

... see more

Tools for paper authors

Submit paper
Claim Paper Authorship

Tools for SE users

Search User
Reclaim SE Account
Request Account Merger
Nativise imported posts
Claim post (deleted users)
Import SE post

Users whose questions have been imported from Physics Stack Exchange, Theoretical Physics Stack Exchange, or any other Stack Exchange site are kindly requested to reclaim their account and not to register as a new user.

Public \(\beta\) tools

Report a bug with a feature
Request a new functionality
404 page design
Send feedback


(propose a free ad)

Site Statistics

205 submissions , 163 unreviewed
5,064 questions , 2,215 unanswered
5,347 answers , 22,734 comments
1,470 users with positive rep
818 active unimported users
More ...

  Editing closed questions

+ 5 like - 0 dislike

It seems to me that some of the closed questions so far contain valuable parts. Maybe the questioner or someone else could transform these questions into valuable ones? Recent questions I have in mind are this one or this other one, where the comment thread explicitely shows the potential of the questions.

But it is also possible to leave the closed questions alone and ask new questions, which would have other merits.

This post has been migrated from (A51.SE)
asked Sep 25, 2011 in SE.TP.discussion by András Bátkai (275 points) [ no revision ]
Improving questions, even closed ones, is always a good idea...

This post has been migrated from (A51.SE)
[Since my current Rep points don't allow direct answering, I'll answer here]: Ref: [Why does the vacuum state break electroweak gauge symmetry?](http://theoreticalphysics.stackexchange.com/questions/113/why-does-the-vacuum-state-break-electroweak-gauge-symmetry) | The question is rather good in my humble opinion [although I'm no expert currently], and I believe it should be part of this site's database of questions / answers. ... So, should I edit the question- leaving it only as, and providing a commentary below giving background and related information to place it in its appropriate context?

This post has been migrated from (A51.SE)
Plus, [also importantly], I wanted to gauge what the community felt regarding the importance / level of importance of the question? Clearly, Peter Woit felt it deserved the status of "Holy Grail" -- and I have too much regard and respect for him to simply consider it a random ad-hoc designation by him. (Lubos' commentaries / opinions aside).

This post has been migrated from (A51.SE)
I agree with François, as possibly both linked posts have a potential for an interesting question if asked in a more precise way.

This post has been migrated from (A51.SE)
@UGPhysics: If I were you, I would ask a completely new question based on your second question. You can give a reference to the discussion on the blog, but formulate the question and add some thoughts if you can. Others more competent than me had better suggestions.

This post has been migrated from (A51.SE)
contd: it is on one hand difficult to get a question reopened, but more importantly, I believe the question should stay at the moment so that other users understand why it got closed. This argument my be hard on you, but a great help for the site.

This post has been migrated from (A51.SE)
UGphysics, if indeed the issue of symmetry breaking you asked about is a contender to be "the holy grail" of physics just like quantum gravity is regarded by many, then asking about it, might be too wide for a good question on this site just like asking "how gravity and quantum mechanics match".

This post has been migrated from (A51.SE)

Your answer

Please use answers only to (at least partly) answer questions. To comment, discuss, or ask for clarification, leave a comment instead.
To mask links under text, please type your text, highlight it, and click the "link" button. You can then enter your link URL.
Please consult the FAQ for as to how to format your post.
This is the answer box; if you want to write a comment instead, please use the 'add comment' button.
Live preview (may slow down editor)   Preview
Your name to display (optional):
Privacy: Your email address will only be used for sending these notifications.
Anti-spam verification:
If you are a human please identify the position of the character covered by the symbol $\varnothing$ in the following word:
Then drag the red bullet below over the corresponding character of our banner. When you drop it there, the bullet changes to green (on slow internet connections after a few seconds).
Please complete the anti-spam verification

user contributions licensed under cc by-sa 3.0 with attribution required

Your rights