• Register
PhysicsOverflow is a next-generation academic platform for physicists and astronomers, including a community peer review system and a postgraduate-level discussion forum analogous to MathOverflow.

Welcome to PhysicsOverflow! PhysicsOverflow is an open platform for community peer review and graduate-level Physics discussion.

Please help promote PhysicsOverflow ads elsewhere if you like it.


PO is now at the Physics Department of Bielefeld University!

New printer friendly PO pages!

Migration to Bielefeld University was successful!

Please vote for this year's PhysicsOverflow ads!

Please do help out in categorising submissions. Submit a paper to PhysicsOverflow!

... see more

Tools for paper authors

Submit paper
Claim Paper Authorship

Tools for SE users

Search User
Reclaim SE Account
Request Account Merger
Nativise imported posts
Claim post (deleted users)
Import SE post

Users whose questions have been imported from Physics Stack Exchange, Theoretical Physics Stack Exchange, or any other Stack Exchange site are kindly requested to reclaim their account and not to register as a new user.

Public \(\beta\) tools

Report a bug with a feature
Request a new functionality
404 page design
Send feedback


(propose a free ad)

Site Statistics

205 submissions , 163 unreviewed
5,054 questions , 2,207 unanswered
5,347 answers , 22,720 comments
1,470 users with positive rep
818 active unimported users
More ...

  How many questions and answers do we need to have a succesful private beta?

+ 1 like - 0 dislike

At this moment, we have 8 questions posted which doesn't seem like a sufficient rate to exit private beta status. Although, that may change over the next several days. I know we are only 8 hours into the private beta, but I was wondering what our goals for the week should be? How many questions should we be looking for? And, how many should be answered? Would a simple goal of having half the committed users submit one question be sufficient?

This post has been migrated from (A51.SE)
asked Sep 15, 2011 in SE.TP.discussion by rcollyer (240 points) [ no revision ]
Suggestion: Post an announcement to solicit at least one appropriate-level question from each committer.

This post has been migrated from (A51.SE)
For reference, 8 questions in 8 hours is twice the rate we get on physics.SE, and the People In Charge seem to think that's perfectly viable, so I can't imagine why you'd be worried at this stage.

This post has been migrated from (A51.SE)
I think that many committers like me will not ask borderline questions on a site that wants to be similar to mathoverflow.

This post has been migrated from (A51.SE)
The private beta site is now up for 12 hours. I would say that it is quite nice to have already so many questions. Really, I think the feedback is astonishing.

This post has been migrated from (A51.SE)
And to be entirely honest, if we don't make it out of Beta, we don't deserve it anyways.

This post has been migrated from (A51.SE)
The purpose of this question was to get some idea of what is expected beyond the imprecise notion of pre-populating the site with good questions. Truthfully, I'm not worried, but being used to the frenzied pace of SO, I was curious if the rate of questions was sufficient. That said, I *do not* advocate posting a host of borderline questions. I was just wondering what a suitable goal would be.

This post has been migrated from (A51.SE)

3 Answers

+ 5 like - 0 dislike

I think the basic answer to this is that we don't really need to worry about exiting private beta. I imagine something would have to go spectacularly wrong for us not to make it to full beta. Once we are in beta then there are some metrics to worry about, as Suresh points out, but I don't think flooding the site with questions will be the answer. For the moment, I think our best bet is to concentrate on quality rather than quantity.

This post has been migrated from (A51.SE)
answered Sep 15, 2011 by Joe Fitzsimons (3,575 points) [ no revision ]
+ 5 like - 0 dislike

There are some basic benchmarks on the number (and, more importantly, the quality) of questions needed to exit private beta. I'm not going to quote specific numbers because we just use them as loose guidelines anyway.

The big picture is that a private beta has to generate enough interesting content to avoid the Empty Restaurant Syndrome.

As the community's "founders," you need to prove that you have something interesting to talk about. You need to establish that your subject has good on-topic questions which receive solid answers. Additionally, you're supposed to establish an strong, active meta community brimming with discussions about what does and doesn't belong here.

If it turns out that the subject is more niche than we all expected, we may choose to extend a private beta past the first week. And if a new site fails to reach these basic benchmarks, it is possible that the site will not find its way to public beta.

But right now, just focus on asking great beta questions!

This post has been migrated from (A51.SE)
answered Sep 15, 2011 by Robert Cartaino (0 points) [ no revision ]
Could you warn us after a couple of days if things start looking shaky?

This post has been migrated from (A51.SE)
@Joe Fitzsimons: That's generally the process. See: http://meta.crypto.stackexchange.com/questions/42/private-beta-extended-still-going-strong

This post has been migrated from (A51.SE)
Could you give us an idea how we're doing, since we are around the halfway mark for the private beta?

This post has been migrated from (A51.SE)
+ 3 like - 0 dislike

If you look at the area51 landing page for theoreticalphysics, it mentions a ballpark of between 5-15 questions to be deemed not problematic, and >15 as good. Note that you don't need to do anything to exit private beta in a week. It's to exit beta status (in at least 90 days and usually more) that you need to hit the stated metrics.

This post has been migrated from (A51.SE)
answered Sep 15, 2011 by suresh (1,545 points) [ no revision ]
I hadn't noticed the totals on that page, so thank you. But, I thought I saw some implication that a site could fail to launch out of private beta, i.e. be dissolved. Although, I may be mistaken. I think I'll delete the question, if you don't mind.

This post has been migrated from (A51.SE)
no problem. but no harm keeping the question: often, others make the same mistake.

This post has been migrated from (A51.SE)
no problem, other than my ego. but, it to will survive.

This post has been migrated from (A51.SE)

Your answer

Please use answers only to (at least partly) answer questions. To comment, discuss, or ask for clarification, leave a comment instead.
To mask links under text, please type your text, highlight it, and click the "link" button. You can then enter your link URL.
Please consult the FAQ for as to how to format your post.
This is the answer box; if you want to write a comment instead, please use the 'add comment' button.
Live preview (may slow down editor)   Preview
Your name to display (optional):
Privacy: Your email address will only be used for sending these notifications.
Anti-spam verification:
If you are a human please identify the position of the character covered by the symbol $\varnothing$ in the following word:
Then drag the red bullet below over the corresponding character of our banner. When you drop it there, the bullet changes to green (on slow internet connections after a few seconds).
Please complete the anti-spam verification

user contributions licensed under cc by-sa 3.0 with attribution required

Your rights