• Register
PhysicsOverflow is a next-generation academic platform for physicists and astronomers, including a community peer review system and a postgraduate-level discussion forum analogous to MathOverflow.

Welcome to PhysicsOverflow! PhysicsOverflow is an open platform for community peer review and graduate-level Physics discussion.

Please help promote PhysicsOverflow ads elsewhere if you like it.


New printer friendly PO pages!

Migration to Bielefeld University was successful!

Please vote for this year's PhysicsOverflow ads!

Please do help out in categorising submissions. Submit a paper to PhysicsOverflow!

... see more

Tools for paper authors

Submit paper
Claim Paper Authorship

Tools for SE users

Search User
Reclaim SE Account
Request Account Merger
Nativise imported posts
Claim post (deleted users)
Import SE post

Users whose questions have been imported from Physics Stack Exchange, Theoretical Physics Stack Exchange, or any other Stack Exchange site are kindly requested to reclaim their account and not to register as a new user.

Public \(\beta\) tools

Report a bug with a feature
Request a new functionality
404 page design
Send feedback


(propose a free ad)

Site Statistics

204 submissions , 162 unreviewed
5,030 questions , 2,184 unanswered
5,344 answers , 22,705 comments
1,470 users with positive rep
816 active unimported users
More ...

  Has Sen quantized superstring fields?

+ 5 like - 0 dislike

Today I saw a paper by Ashoke Sen titled "BV Master Action for Heterotic and Type II String Field Theories".

  1. Is it really the "quantization" of superstring fields for the first time?

  2. What can be its possible implications in string theory?

  3. Can it be helpful to "prove" Maldacena's original AdS/CFT conjecture (in the context of type IIB superstrings) as it incorporates Ramond-Ramond fields in the quantized theory?

This post imported from StackExchange Physics at 2015-08-26 05:07 (UTC), posted by SE-user pinu
asked Aug 25, 2015 in Theoretical Physics by Physics Moron (285 points) [ no revision ]

1 Answer

+ 4 like - 0 dislike

Thanks for asking this question.

Sen's central result is that his approach to formulating the action in the Ramond sector is consistent. That is, the spurious degrees of freedom he needs for the Ramond action decouple at the loop level. For Type II superstrings, we probably can't do much better than this because the self-dual five form resists a Lagrangian description. For heterotic strings and open strings, there may be better options. See the recent paper by Okawa and Kunitomo.

Sen does not actually go very far towards constructing the Lagrangian. But he has an argument that in principle one can find a set of closed string vertices which satisfy a set of algebraic relations which imply gauge invariance. This is an argument he has been developing, at some points in collaboration with E. Witten, over the past 2 years or so.

I do not know how much one can learn about nonperturbative string theory knowing the existence of such a Lagrangian. To me, it seems we do not know much more about the Lagrangian than a set of algebraic relations which have been known since the 90's, and in any case were generally expected to apply to superstrings. But I wouldn't underestimate A. Sen. I am most excited to see where he goes with this.

answered Sep 8, 2015 by T. Erler [ no revision ]

Your answer

Please use answers only to (at least partly) answer questions. To comment, discuss, or ask for clarification, leave a comment instead.
To mask links under text, please type your text, highlight it, and click the "link" button. You can then enter your link URL.
Please consult the FAQ for as to how to format your post.
This is the answer box; if you want to write a comment instead, please use the 'add comment' button.
Live preview (may slow down editor)   Preview
Your name to display (optional):
Privacy: Your email address will only be used for sending these notifications.
Anti-spam verification:
If you are a human please identify the position of the character covered by the symbol $\varnothing$ in the following word:
Then drag the red bullet below over the corresponding character of our banner. When you drop it there, the bullet changes to green (on slow internet connections after a few seconds).
Please complete the anti-spam verification

user contributions licensed under cc by-sa 3.0 with attribution required

Your rights