• Register
PhysicsOverflow is a next-generation academic platform for physicists and astronomers, including a community peer review system and a postgraduate-level discussion forum analogous to MathOverflow.

Welcome to PhysicsOverflow! PhysicsOverflow is an open platform for community peer review and graduate-level Physics discussion.

Please help promote PhysicsOverflow ads elsewhere if you like it.


PO is now at the Physics Department of Bielefeld University!

New printer friendly PO pages!

Migration to Bielefeld University was successful!

Please vote for this year's PhysicsOverflow ads!

Please do help out in categorising submissions. Submit a paper to PhysicsOverflow!

... see more

Tools for paper authors

Submit paper
Claim Paper Authorship

Tools for SE users

Search User
Reclaim SE Account
Request Account Merger
Nativise imported posts
Claim post (deleted users)
Import SE post

Users whose questions have been imported from Physics Stack Exchange, Theoretical Physics Stack Exchange, or any other Stack Exchange site are kindly requested to reclaim their account and not to register as a new user.

Public \(\beta\) tools

Report a bug with a feature
Request a new functionality
404 page design
Send feedback


(propose a free ad)

Site Statistics

205 submissions , 163 unreviewed
5,047 questions , 2,200 unanswered
5,345 answers , 22,709 comments
1,470 users with positive rep
816 active unimported users
More ...

  Charged black holes and AdS/CFT

+ 4 like - 0 dislike

People generalize the statements of AdS/CFT correspondence by adding black hole (charged black hole) in the gravity theory to provide the dual gauge theory finite temperature (finite density). I have some problems (may be very basic) understanding these concepts with charged BH intuitively.

  1. Is it true that whenever one adds a charged BH in the bulk one introduces conserved current (matter degrees of freedom) in the boundary? For N=4 SYM what are they?

  2. What does the chemical potential do in dual field theory side? Actually I don't really have clear intuitive picture of chemical potential unlike pressure, temperature etc.

  3. When one adds charge to a BH the temperature of the BH depends on both mass and charge. Now what are the independent parameters one can tune to make the BH extremal? What do these changes mean in the dual field theory picture?

This post imported from StackExchange Physics at 2015-08-22 08:20 (UTC), posted by SE-user pinu

asked Jun 9, 2015 in Theoretical Physics by Physics Moron (285 points) [ revision history ]
edited Aug 22, 2015 by Dilaton
I am still waiting for an answer. Can someone please give me some references, if possible? Thanks a lot!

This post imported from StackExchange Physics at 2015-08-22 08:20 (UTC), posted by SE-user pinu

Your answer

Please use answers only to (at least partly) answer questions. To comment, discuss, or ask for clarification, leave a comment instead.
To mask links under text, please type your text, highlight it, and click the "link" button. You can then enter your link URL.
Please consult the FAQ for as to how to format your post.
This is the answer box; if you want to write a comment instead, please use the 'add comment' button.
Live preview (may slow down editor)   Preview
Your name to display (optional):
Privacy: Your email address will only be used for sending these notifications.
Anti-spam verification:
If you are a human please identify the position of the character covered by the symbol $\varnothing$ in the following word:
Then drag the red bullet below over the corresponding character of our banner. When you drop it there, the bullet changes to green (on slow internet connections after a few seconds).
Please complete the anti-spam verification

user contributions licensed under cc by-sa 3.0 with attribution required

Your rights