• Register
PhysicsOverflow is a next-generation academic platform for physicists and astronomers, including a community peer review system and a postgraduate-level discussion forum analogous to MathOverflow.

Welcome to PhysicsOverflow! PhysicsOverflow is an open platform for community peer review and graduate-level Physics discussion.

Please help promote PhysicsOverflow ads elsewhere if you like it.


New printer friendly PO pages!

Migration to Bielefeld University was successful!

Please vote for this year's PhysicsOverflow ads!

Please do help out in categorising submissions. Submit a paper to PhysicsOverflow!

... see more

Tools for paper authors

Submit paper
Claim Paper Authorship

Tools for SE users

Search User
Reclaim SE Account
Request Account Merger
Nativise imported posts
Claim post (deleted users)
Import SE post

Users whose questions have been imported from Physics Stack Exchange, Theoretical Physics Stack Exchange, or any other Stack Exchange site are kindly requested to reclaim their account and not to register as a new user.

Public \(\beta\) tools

Report a bug with a feature
Request a new functionality
404 page design
Send feedback


(propose a free ad)

Site Statistics

184 submissions , 144 unreviewed
4,716 questions , 1,923 unanswered
5,264 answers , 22,439 comments
1,470 users with positive rep
743 active unimported users
More ...

  QCD Color Structure relation

+ 2 like - 0 dislike

i want to proof the following relation :

\begin{equation} t^a t^b \otimes t^a t^b = \frac{2}{N_C} \delta^{ab} \mathbb{1} \otimes \mathbb{1} - \frac{1}{N_C} t^a \otimes t^a \end{equation}

Right now I calculated the second term, but still have problems to get to the Casimir operator $C_F$ of the first term.

Knowing $t^a = \frac{\lambda^a}{2}$ and $\lambda^a\lambda^b = \frac{2}{N_C}\delta^{ab} + d^{abc}\lambda^c + i f^{abc}\lambda^c$ yields

\begin{equation} t^a t^b \otimes t^a t^b = \frac{1}{16}\lambda^a \lambda^b \otimes \lambda^a \lambda^b \end{equation} \begin{equation} = \frac{1}{16} \left[ \frac{2}{N_C}\delta^{ab} + d^{abc}\lambda^c + i f^{abc}\lambda^c \right] \otimes \left[ \frac{2}{N_C}\delta^{ab} + d^{abc}\lambda^c + i f^{abc}\lambda^c \right] \end{equation} I am hopefully right, that $f^{aab} = d^{aab} = 0$, thus \begin{equation} = \frac{1}{16} \left[ \frac{4}{N_C^2} \delta^{ab} \mathbb{1} \otimes \mathbb{1} - \frac{4}{N} \lambda^c \otimes \lambda^c + i d^{abc}f^{abc} \lambda^c \otimes \lambda^c + i f^{abc} d^{abc} \lambda^c \otimes \lambda^c \right] \end{equation} where I used $f^{abc}f^{abc} = N$ and $d^{abc}d^{abc} = \left( N - \frac{4}{N} \right)$.

The Casimir operator is defined as \begin{equation} \frac{N_C^2 -1}{2N_C} \equiv C_F \end{equation}

And as I said I do not know how to get to the result of the first equation by plugging in the Casimir operator. I have a strong guess that if I would know how to deal with the terms $i d^{abc}f^{abc} \lambda^c \otimes \lambda^c$ the result will be obvious, but until know I appreciate every help.

This post imported from StackExchange Physics at 2015-07-16 09:30 (UTC), posted by SE-user Knowledge
asked Jul 15, 2015 in Theoretical Physics by Knowledge (15 points) [ no revision ]
retagged Jul 16, 2015
There's some inconsistency in the notation going on here - do you sum over repeated indices or not? If the answer is "sometimes", you should write explicit sums where you do so.

This post imported from StackExchange Physics at 2015-07-16 09:30 (UTC), posted by SE-user ACuriousMind

Your answer

Please use answers only to (at least partly) answer questions. To comment, discuss, or ask for clarification, leave a comment instead.
To mask links under text, please type your text, highlight it, and click the "link" button. You can then enter your link URL.
Please consult the FAQ for as to how to format your post.
This is the answer box; if you want to write a comment instead, please use the 'add comment' button.
Live preview (may slow down editor)   Preview
Your name to display (optional):
Privacy: Your email address will only be used for sending these notifications.
Anti-spam verification:
If you are a human please identify the position of the character covered by the symbol $\varnothing$ in the following word:
Then drag the red bullet below over the corresponding character of our banner. When you drop it there, the bullet changes to green (on slow internet connections after a few seconds).
To avoid this verification in future, please log in or register.

user contributions licensed under cc by-sa 3.0 with attribution required

Your rights