Quantcast
  • Register
PhysicsOverflow is a next-generation academic platform for physicists and astronomers, including a community peer review system and a postgraduate-level discussion forum analogous to MathOverflow.

Welcome to PhysicsOverflow! PhysicsOverflow is an open platform for community peer review and graduate-level Physics discussion.

Please help promote PhysicsOverflow ads elsewhere if you like it.

News

New printer friendly PO pages!

Migration to Bielefeld University was successful!

Please vote for this year's PhysicsOverflow ads!

Please do help out in categorising submissions. Submit a paper to PhysicsOverflow!

... see more

Tools for paper authors

Submit paper
Claim Paper Authorship

Tools for SE users

Search User
Reclaim SE Account
Request Account Merger
Nativise imported posts
Claim post (deleted users)
Import SE post

Users whose questions have been imported from Physics Stack Exchange, Theoretical Physics Stack Exchange, or any other Stack Exchange site are kindly requested to reclaim their account and not to register as a new user.

Public \(\beta\) tools

Report a bug with a feature
Request a new functionality
404 page design
Send feedback

Attributions

(propose a free ad)

Site Statistics

146 submissions , 123 unreviewed
3,953 questions , 1,403 unanswered
4,889 answers , 20,762 comments
1,470 users with positive rep
507 active unimported users
More ...

Interpretation of the upper bound for the angular momentum of macroscopic and microscopic rotating black holes?

+ 2 like - 0 dislike
119 views

For a rotating Kerr black hole, it can be shown that the possible absolute value of its angular momentum is bounded by its mass squared

\[¦ J¦ \le M^2\]

where equality means that we have an extremal black hole.

What is the intuitive interpretation of this constraint of the angular momentum for both, microscopic and macroscopic (astrophysical) black holes?

From my naive hand-waving understanding, I could imagine that in case of an astrophysical black hole, it just means that a too large angular momentum would tear the black hole apart.
However, concerning microscopic black holes (with a mass about $m_p$) I have not much intuition about what this upper bound for the absolute value of the angular momentum could mean. By some S-duality arguments, such a microscopic black hole corresponds to lowering the string coupling constant to a single elementary particle, so there is nothing that could be torn apart by increasing the angular momentum for example.

asked Mar 30, 2015 in Theoretical Physics by Dilaton (4,305 points) [ revision history ]
edited Mar 30, 2015 by Arnold Neumaier

Your answer

Please use answers only to (at least partly) answer questions. To comment, discuss, or ask for clarification, leave a comment instead.
To mask links under text, please type your text, highlight it, and click the "link" button. You can then enter your link URL.
Please consult the FAQ for as to how to format your post.
This is the answer box; if you want to write a comment instead, please use the 'add comment' button.
Live preview (may slow down editor)   Preview
Your name to display (optional):
Privacy: Your email address will only be used for sending these notifications.
Anti-spam verification:
If you are a human please identify the position of the character covered by the symbol $\varnothing$ in the following word:
p$\hbar$ysicsOve$\varnothing$flow
Then drag the red bullet below over the corresponding character of our banner. When you drop it there, the bullet changes to green (on slow internet connections after a few seconds).
To avoid this verification in future, please log in or register.




user contributions licensed under cc by-sa 3.0 with attribution required

Your rights
...