• Register
PhysicsOverflow is a next-generation academic platform for physicists and astronomers, including a community peer review system and a postgraduate-level discussion forum analogous to MathOverflow.

Welcome to PhysicsOverflow! PhysicsOverflow is an open platform for community peer review and graduate-level Physics discussion.

Please help promote PhysicsOverflow ads elsewhere if you like it.


PO is now at the Physics Department of Bielefeld University!

New printer friendly PO pages!

Migration to Bielefeld University was successful!

Please vote for this year's PhysicsOverflow ads!

Please do help out in categorising submissions. Submit a paper to PhysicsOverflow!

... see more

Tools for paper authors

Submit paper
Claim Paper Authorship

Tools for SE users

Search User
Reclaim SE Account
Request Account Merger
Nativise imported posts
Claim post (deleted users)
Import SE post

Users whose questions have been imported from Physics Stack Exchange, Theoretical Physics Stack Exchange, or any other Stack Exchange site are kindly requested to reclaim their account and not to register as a new user.

Public \(\beta\) tools

Report a bug with a feature
Request a new functionality
404 page design
Send feedback


(propose a free ad)

Site Statistics

205 submissions , 163 unreviewed
5,047 questions , 2,200 unanswered
5,345 answers , 22,709 comments
1,470 users with positive rep
816 active unimported users
More ...

  New features for revision history of posts

+ 4 like - 0 dislike

Our history recording feature got two upgrades in order to enable users to track revisions of their posts. There have been two major changes implemented:

1. Visibility of the revision history

The revision history is now accessible for every post by a link at the meta tags line, for instance as:

Posts with unchanged content also have a link to the revision history, but with a different text:

Like this, all changes made to posts may be tracked. This feature is accessible to all users.

2. History recording for comments

Edits on comments are now also tracked in the revision history. However, the recording started with the implementation of the new features today (2015/02/28). Earlier changes have not been recorded and are therefore not visible.

asked Feb 28, 2015 in Announcements by polarkernel (0 points) [ no revision ]
Wow great, and this was fast ...! Thanks a lot Polarkernel :-)

Thanks, polarkernel!

Cool, thanks a lot!

Great! Testing. Works! (test again)

2 Answers

+ 3 like - 0 dislike

I have added an additional feature to the revision history. On top of the revision history, a complete list of all events like created, edited, retagged, recategorized, hidden, reshown, closed and reopened is displayed. Like this it is now completely transparent to all users what happened to a post on PhysicsOverflow. These events are visible for all posts written since the eventlog has been installed (2014/03/06).

If the content of a post did not change, for instance in the case of recategorization, the revision history stays to be linked as "no revision", but the event will be visible if you click on this link The reason for this is that the very large eventlog database table would have to be queried for every post in a question thread to get the information about such an event. This would delay the page for about 3 to 5 seconds, depending on the length of the thread, which I wanted to prevent.

Another exception is automatic retagging by the Tagging Tools plugin by Scott Vivian, which is not logged in the eventlog (appears as "retagged by anonymous" or just "retagged xx days ago" or similar).

answered Mar 3, 2015 by polarkernel (0 points) [ no revision ]

We all appreciate it, polarkernel. Thanks!

Thanks, this is great! 

+ 0 like - 0 dislike

Please hide the [no revision] indicator, as it is the default and just pollutes the appearance of the lists of Q/A.

For complete transparency it is enough that the indicator appears when there are revisions.

answered Mar 3, 2015 by Arnold Neumaier (15,787 points) [ no revision ]

Well, I for one would want to see a link to the revision history even when there are no revisions. Perhaps the link could be made less striking by adding it to the  action type  (e.g. "edited")? 

Your answer

Please use answers only to (at least partly) answer questions. To comment, discuss, or ask for clarification, leave a comment instead.
To mask links under text, please type your text, highlight it, and click the "link" button. You can then enter your link URL.
Please consult the FAQ for as to how to format your post.
This is the answer box; if you want to write a comment instead, please use the 'add comment' button.
Live preview (may slow down editor)   Preview
Your name to display (optional):
Privacy: Your email address will only be used for sending these notifications.
Anti-spam verification:
If you are a human please identify the position of the character covered by the symbol $\varnothing$ in the following word:
Then drag the red bullet below over the corresponding character of our banner. When you drop it there, the bullet changes to green (on slow internet connections after a few seconds).
Please complete the anti-spam verification

user contributions licensed under cc by-sa 3.0 with attribution required

Your rights