Quantcast
  • Register
PhysicsOverflow is a next-generation academic platform for physicists and astronomers, including a community peer review system and a postgraduate-level discussion forum analogous to MathOverflow.

Welcome to PhysicsOverflow! PhysicsOverflow is an open platform for community peer review and graduate-level Physics discussion.

Please help promote PhysicsOverflow ads elsewhere if you like it.

News

PO is now at the Physics Department of Bielefeld University!

New printer friendly PO pages!

Migration to Bielefeld University was successful!

Please vote for this year's PhysicsOverflow ads!

Please do help out in categorising submissions. Submit a paper to PhysicsOverflow!

... see more

Tools for paper authors

Submit paper
Claim Paper Authorship

Tools for SE users

Search User
Reclaim SE Account
Request Account Merger
Nativise imported posts
Claim post (deleted users)
Import SE post

Users whose questions have been imported from Physics Stack Exchange, Theoretical Physics Stack Exchange, or any other Stack Exchange site are kindly requested to reclaim their account and not to register as a new user.

Public \(\beta\) tools

Report a bug with a feature
Request a new functionality
404 page design
Send feedback

Attributions

(propose a free ad)

Site Statistics

205 submissions , 163 unreviewed
5,082 questions , 2,232 unanswered
5,353 answers , 22,789 comments
1,470 users with positive rep
820 active unimported users
More ...

  Why are most questions here about high energy physics ?

+ 3 like - 0 dislike
1140 views

It seems that most questions are related to high energy physics. There's not much discussion about condensed matter physics , nuclear physics and virtually most other branches. Why ?

asked Feb 15, 2015 in Discussion by anonymous [ revision history ]
recategorized Apr 2, 2015 by dimension10

2 Answers

+ 4 like - 0 dislike
It is because the the current population of this site consists mostly of high-energy people. We absolutely welcome physics discussions from other branches. It'll definitely be nice to have diversity.
answered Feb 15, 2015 by Jia Yiyang (2,640 points) [ revision history ]
I tend to think that condensed matter theorists don't like to discuss on online forums .
@anonymous, that might be the case, but even taking that into account, my impression is that there should be enough condensed matter people lurking online to make a viable community, maybe they just need some time to "come out of the closet".
+ 3 like - 0 dislike

If you want to see more on currently sub-represented topics, post your own questions, or ask for importing from Physics Stack Exchange specific (i.e., with link) high level questions/answers that are of interest to you.

answered Mar 9, 2015 by Arnold Neumaier (15,787 points) [ no revision ]

Your answer

Please use answers only to (at least partly) answer questions. To comment, discuss, or ask for clarification, leave a comment instead.
To mask links under text, please type your text, highlight it, and click the "link" button. You can then enter your link URL.
Please consult the FAQ for as to how to format your post.
This is the answer box; if you want to write a comment instead, please use the 'add comment' button.
Live preview (may slow down editor)   Preview
Your name to display (optional):
Privacy: Your email address will only be used for sending these notifications.
Anti-spam verification:
If you are a human please identify the position of the character covered by the symbol $\varnothing$ in the following word:
p$\hbar$ysicsOve$\varnothing$flow
Then drag the red bullet below over the corresponding character of our banner. When you drop it there, the bullet changes to green (on slow internet connections after a few seconds).
Please complete the anti-spam verification




user contributions licensed under cc by-sa 3.0 with attribution required

Your rights
...