• Register
PhysicsOverflow is a next-generation academic platform for physicists and astronomers, including a community peer review system and a postgraduate-level discussion forum analogous to MathOverflow.

Welcome to PhysicsOverflow! PhysicsOverflow is an open platform for community peer review and graduate-level Physics discussion.

Please help promote PhysicsOverflow ads elsewhere if you like it.


PO is now at the Physics Department of Bielefeld University!

New printer friendly PO pages!

Migration to Bielefeld University was successful!

Please vote for this year's PhysicsOverflow ads!

Please do help out in categorising submissions. Submit a paper to PhysicsOverflow!

... see more

Tools for paper authors

Submit paper
Claim Paper Authorship

Tools for SE users

Search User
Reclaim SE Account
Request Account Merger
Nativise imported posts
Claim post (deleted users)
Import SE post

Users whose questions have been imported from Physics Stack Exchange, Theoretical Physics Stack Exchange, or any other Stack Exchange site are kindly requested to reclaim their account and not to register as a new user.

Public \(\beta\) tools

Report a bug with a feature
Request a new functionality
404 page design
Send feedback


(propose a free ad)

Site Statistics

205 submissions , 163 unreviewed
5,054 questions , 2,207 unanswered
5,345 answers , 22,719 comments
1,470 users with positive rep
818 active unimported users
More ...

  Quivers Representations in SUSY gauge theories

+ 4 like - 0 dislike

I would like to hear some reasons and ideas on how quivers are useful in SUSY gauge theories. There is a nice answer about the case of D-branes here but it is not clear on their appearance in gauge theory independently of the D-branes. More specifically I have heard that quivers can describe BPS states. Is this correct? And why so?

This post imported from StackExchange Physics at 2015-02-07 11:48 (UTC), posted by SE-user user39726
asked Feb 5, 2015 in Theoretical Physics by user39726 (25 points) [ no revision ]
SUSY quivers are dissected here arxiv.org/abs/hep-th/0201205

This post imported from StackExchange Physics at 2015-02-07 11:48 (UTC), posted by SE-user Autolatry

1 Answer

+ 3 like - 0 dislike

Indeed, quivers first appeared in the context of D-branes at (conifold) singularities (there are various nice expositions in Klebanov-Witten theory reviews) where the D-branes "conspire" to give a $\mathcal{N}=1$ SYM theory. Additionally, gauge theories are strongly encoded inside the physics of D-branes, so I am not sure in what way you can "separate" these notions. Usually, quivers are used to describe the physics of BPS bound states of $\mathcal{N}=2$ susy and sugra. I will say a few words on this as an example of quivers in gauge theories. So let us consider $\mathcal{N}=2$ theory in four dimensions. As you will probably know this theory has a moduli space with a Coulomb and a Higgs branch. Let us consider a point $u$ in the Coulomb branch $\mathcal{C}$ of the moduli space. There we have a gauged $U(1)^r$ symmetry group together with a lattice $\Gamma$ from which the various BPS states take their charges $(p,q)$. From Seiberg-Witten theory we know how to consider the above on an elliptic curve $\Sigma_u$ that varies along $\mathcal{C}$. It is very well known that the homology classes of 1-cycles along the tori we are considering can be identified with $\Gamma$. This is all standard Seiberg-Witten stuff. Seiberg-Witten is of course solved in the IR. To study the BPS states at some specific point $u \in \mathcal{C}$ we need to introduce the quiver. These theories also have a central charge $Z$. Now, we take half the plain of the plane on which the central charge $Z$ takes values and we name it $H$. On this plane there exist a set of $2r+f$ (where $f$ is the number of flavors of the theory) states which are customary to denote as $\gamma_i$ (that we can naively consider them as particles). It turns out that such a basis, if it exists, it is the only possible one, it is unique. Using this basis, the set $\{ \gamma_i \}$ we can construct a quiver. For every $\gamma_i$ we draw a node and for every pair we draw arrows that connect them. Then we can use quiver quantum mechanics to find the BPS bound states of the BPS "particles" $\gamma_i$. So the moral/summary is the following: In the $\mathcal{N}=2$ theory consider a point $u$ of the Coulomb branch and use its data to form (if possible) a basis $\{ \gamma_i \}$ of the hypers. Then put a node on each one, and arrows between them. Then use quiver quantum mechanics to find the BPS bound states.

answered Feb 7, 2015 by conformal_gk (3,625 points) [ revision history ]
edited Mar 11, 2015 by conformal_gk

What are `BPS bound states' in the case of Seiberg-Witten, are they decay constituents, ie. (1,0) monopole and (1,-1) dyon), that appear at wall of marginal stability ? Also, could you give a reference for the quiver construction of Seiberg Witten BPS states that you mentioned in the comment ?

Your answer

Please use answers only to (at least partly) answer questions. To comment, discuss, or ask for clarification, leave a comment instead.
To mask links under text, please type your text, highlight it, and click the "link" button. You can then enter your link URL.
Please consult the FAQ for as to how to format your post.
This is the answer box; if you want to write a comment instead, please use the 'add comment' button.
Live preview (may slow down editor)   Preview
Your name to display (optional):
Privacy: Your email address will only be used for sending these notifications.
Anti-spam verification:
If you are a human please identify the position of the character covered by the symbol $\varnothing$ in the following word:
Then drag the red bullet below over the corresponding character of our banner. When you drop it there, the bullet changes to green (on slow internet connections after a few seconds).
Please complete the anti-spam verification

user contributions licensed under cc by-sa 3.0 with attribution required

Your rights