Quantcast
  • Register
PhysicsOverflow is a next-generation academic platform for physicists and astronomers, including a community peer review system and a postgraduate-level discussion forum analogous to MathOverflow.

Welcome to PhysicsOverflow! PhysicsOverflow is an open platform for community peer review and graduate-level Physics discussion.

Please help promote PhysicsOverflow ads elsewhere if you like it.

News

New printer friendly PO pages!

Migration to Bielefeld University was successful!

Please vote for this year's PhysicsOverflow ads!

Please do help out in categorising submissions. Submit a paper to PhysicsOverflow!

... see more

Tools for paper authors

Submit paper
Claim Paper Authorship

Tools for SE users

Search User
Reclaim SE Account
Request Account Merger
Nativise imported posts
Claim post (deleted users)
Import SE post

Users whose questions have been imported from Physics Stack Exchange, Theoretical Physics Stack Exchange, or any other Stack Exchange site are kindly requested to reclaim their account and not to register as a new user.

Public \(\beta\) tools

Report a bug with a feature
Request a new functionality
404 page design
Send feedback

Attributions

(propose a free ad)

Site Statistics

145 submissions , 122 unreviewed
3,930 questions , 1,398 unanswered
4,873 answers , 20,701 comments
1,470 users with positive rep
502 active unimported users
More ...

Physics in torus, cylinder, Klein bottle and mobius strip

+ 3 like - 0 dislike
1322 views

In string theory, or supersymmetric gauge theory, they often calculate the partition function on specific Riemann surfaces, such as torus, cylinder, Klein bottle, Mobius strip.

Refer to the Polchinski chapter 7, these surfaces are Euler number zero type surfaces.

In organizing them, they can be parametrized by the complex plane with different period and different boundary conditions.

Why do we distinguish them and what is the physical interpretation of each surface?

This post imported from StackExchange Physics at 2014-10-11 09:47 (UTC), posted by SE-user phy_math
asked Oct 11, 2014 in Theoretical Physics by phy_math (185 points) [ no revision ]
One remark: not all of these surfaces are Riemann surfaces. They all locally look like the complex plane, but for the Klein bottle and the Möbius strip this cannot be done in such a way that the change of coordinate maps are complex differentiable

This post imported from StackExchange Physics at 2014-10-11 09:47 (UTC), posted by SE-user doetoe

1 Answer

+ 3 like - 0 dislike

This is a short answer just trying to give some insight on what you are asking. Please correct any false statements and augment my response if needed.

About the Tori: Well, depends on the context. For example the torus is a very usual type of compactifications we make. Actually the first thing on learns on string compactifications is the torus compactification where you assume that the internal dimensions have the corresponding geometry. Furthermore tori appear whenever we have the complex plane modded out by some lattice, something that appears quite often in string theory and susy gauge theories. Understanding Seiberg-Witten theory is all about understanding the what the two cycles in the torus actually represent (check Tachikawa's book on N=2 susy (http://arxiv.org/abs/1312.2684) or if you want I can send you some personal "decently" and pedagogically written notes)

About the Moebius strip and the Klein bottle: Well I will just give you an example. There exists a class of string theories which have unoriented strings. These theories are defined by unorientable worldsheets in the genus expansion. Now, it is easier to picture and understand this when you consider some orientifold. Imagine you have a string theory whose left and right sectors (movers) are identical. An obvious example is bosonic string theory or Type IIB. Then it is possible to construct a new theory as the quotient of some symmetry called worldsheet parity \(\tilde{\Omega}\)whose action exchanges the left and right movers. So, in this theory we have the following states identified

\(|A\rangle_L \otimes |B\rangle_R \equiv |A\rangle_R \otimes |B\rangle_L\),

and this identification poses a modification of the genus expansion.  For example (and related to the torus) the usual contribution is the torus which can be understood as: string states evolve and then they glue back together to the original state up to the action of the worldsheet parity \(\tilde{\Omega}\). Depending on wether we are dealing with closed string or open string we get, as a worldsheet geometry, a Klein bottle or a Moebius strip respectively! Try to draw it! There is much more to say but I will stop here for now!

answered Oct 12, 2014 by conformal_gk (3,535 points) [ revision history ]
edited Oct 13, 2014 by conformal_gk

Your answer

Please use answers only to (at least partly) answer questions. To comment, discuss, or ask for clarification, leave a comment instead.
To mask links under text, please type your text, highlight it, and click the "link" button. You can then enter your link URL.
Please consult the FAQ for as to how to format your post.
This is the answer box; if you want to write a comment instead, please use the 'add comment' button.
Live preview (may slow down editor)   Preview
Your name to display (optional):
Privacy: Your email address will only be used for sending these notifications.
Anti-spam verification:
If you are a human please identify the position of the character covered by the symbol $\varnothing$ in the following word:
p$\hbar$ysic$\varnothing$Overflow
Then drag the red bullet below over the corresponding character of our banner. When you drop it there, the bullet changes to green (on slow internet connections after a few seconds).
To avoid this verification in future, please log in or register.




user contributions licensed under cc by-sa 3.0 with attribution required

Your rights
...