Quantcast
  • Register
PhysicsOverflow is a next-generation academic platform for physicists and astronomers, including a community peer review system and a postgraduate-level discussion forum analogous to MathOverflow.

Welcome to PhysicsOverflow! PhysicsOverflow is an open platform for community peer review and graduate-level Physics discussion.

Please help promote PhysicsOverflow ads elsewhere if you like it.

News

New printer friendly PO pages!

Migration to Bielefeld University was successful!

Please vote for this year's PhysicsOverflow ads!

Please do help out in categorising submissions. Submit a paper to PhysicsOverflow!

... see more

Tools for paper authors

Submit paper
Claim Paper Authorship

Tools for SE users

Search User
Reclaim SE Account
Request Account Merger
Nativise imported posts
Claim post (deleted users)
Import SE post

Users whose questions have been imported from Physics Stack Exchange, Theoretical Physics Stack Exchange, or any other Stack Exchange site are kindly requested to reclaim their account and not to register as a new user.

Public \(\beta\) tools

Report a bug with a feature
Request a new functionality
404 page design
Send feedback

Attributions

(propose a free ad)

Site Statistics

146 submissions , 123 unreviewed
3,953 questions , 1,403 unanswered
4,889 answers , 20,761 comments
1,470 users with positive rep
506 active unimported users
More ...

TQFTs and Feynman motives

+ 4 like - 0 dislike
1439 views

Is a topological quantum field theory metrizable? or else a tqft coming from a subfactor?
For a given metric, are there always renormalization and Feynman diagrams?
Is there always a Feynman motive related to it?
Finally, does this Feynman motive depend on the choice of the metric?

Clarification by the OP given in a comment here

"First, all these questions could be unified by "Is the Feynman motive a topological invariant?". My motivation comes from the observation that the subfactors theory and the motives theory are both an "enriched Galois theory" so that I asked myself if there is a link between these two enrichment. The path through TQFTs and Feynman motives could be a link."

Some references:
- André; An Introduction to Motives (Pure motives, mixed motives, periods); 2004
- Cartier; A mad day's work: from Grothendieck to Connes and Kontsevich, the evolution of concepts of space and symmetry; 2001.
- Connes, Kreimer; Renormalization in quantum field theory and the Riemann-Hilbert problem I and II; 2000, 2001.
- Connes, Marcolli; Noncommutative Geometry, Quantum Field Theory and Motives; 2008.
- Henry; From toposes to non-commutative geometry through the study of internal Hilbert spaces; PhD dissertation; 2014.
- Kodiyalam, Sunder; Topological quantum field theories from subfactors; 2000.
- Kodiyalam, Sunder, Vishwambhar; Subfactors and 1+1-dimensional TQFTs; 2005.
- Marcolli; Feynman motives; 2010.


This post imported from StackExchange Physics at 2014-10-06 20:59 (UTC), posted by SE-user Sébastien Palcoux

asked Sep 24, 2014 in Theoretical Physics by Sébastien Palcoux (90 points) [ revision history ]
edited Oct 9, 2014 by Dilaton

Can you expand on these questions? Maybe give some motivation or examples where you have some understanding. Since you have so many questions, maybe consider just asking one of them or writing separate questions.

To start at the beginning, what do you want to mean by a metric on a topological field theory? Hence what do you want to mean by a TQFT being "metrizable"?

Your answer

Please use answers only to (at least partly) answer questions. To comment, discuss, or ask for clarification, leave a comment instead.
To mask links under text, please type your text, highlight it, and click the "link" button. You can then enter your link URL.
Please consult the FAQ for as to how to format your post.
This is the answer box; if you want to write a comment instead, please use the 'add comment' button.
Live preview (may slow down editor)   Preview
Your name to display (optional):
Privacy: Your email address will only be used for sending these notifications.
Anti-spam verification:
If you are a human please identify the position of the character covered by the symbol $\varnothing$ in the following word:
p$\hbar$ysics$\varnothing$verflow
Then drag the red bullet below over the corresponding character of our banner. When you drop it there, the bullet changes to green (on slow internet connections after a few seconds).
To avoid this verification in future, please log in or register.




user contributions licensed under cc by-sa 3.0 with attribution required

Your rights
...