• Register
PhysicsOverflow is a next-generation academic platform for physicists and astronomers, including a community peer review system and a postgraduate-level discussion forum analogous to MathOverflow.

Welcome to PhysicsOverflow! PhysicsOverflow is an open platform for community peer review and graduate-level Physics discussion.

Please help promote PhysicsOverflow ads elsewhere if you like it.


PO is now at the Physics Department of Bielefeld University!

New printer friendly PO pages!

Migration to Bielefeld University was successful!

Please vote for this year's PhysicsOverflow ads!

Please do help out in categorising submissions. Submit a paper to PhysicsOverflow!

... see more

Tools for paper authors

Submit paper
Claim Paper Authorship

Tools for SE users

Search User
Reclaim SE Account
Request Account Merger
Nativise imported posts
Claim post (deleted users)
Import SE post

Users whose questions have been imported from Physics Stack Exchange, Theoretical Physics Stack Exchange, or any other Stack Exchange site are kindly requested to reclaim their account and not to register as a new user.

Public \(\beta\) tools

Report a bug with a feature
Request a new functionality
404 page design
Send feedback


(propose a free ad)

Site Statistics

205 submissions , 163 unreviewed
5,054 questions , 2,207 unanswered
5,345 answers , 22,721 comments
1,470 users with positive rep
818 active unimported users
More ...

  Need advice about finding a PhD in causal dynamical triangulations

+ 3 like - 0 dislike
First of all, sorry if this is off-topic

I have decided I want to do a PhD related to causal dynamical triangulations. Unfortunately, there are very few people who are familiar with the subject. Obviously I am going to apply to try to work with these individuals. However, I was wondering if it is possible to apply to work with people who aren't directly familiar with CDT, but instead specialize in relevant topics (e.g. statistical mechanics or some branch of mathematics)  and then work on CDT under their supervision. Can a PhD work like this? If so, what types of fields should I be looking into?
asked Oct 6, 2014 in Resources and References by coarsegrained (60 points) [ revision history ]
recategorized Jan 20, 2015 by Jia Yiyang

Why not try to work with the individuals who actually do this? In principle you are right, you can work on similar or close enough projects and also try to learn/work on CDT. For example, you could send some mails to the relevant people and ask for some kind of guidance or even problems of CDT to work on gradually. It works fine for me )

I think it depends on if your adviser from the related field supports your ideas, even though he is probably not an expert on CDT himself. If he supports you, he will probably allow you to collaberate with an external CDT group too, let you visit them from time to time etc to discuss things that can not be solved by email.

In my experience (currently a PhD student), it's very difficult to organize and carry out a research program in some area unless at least one among you and your advisor are well-versed with the topic. So, if you're working with someone who's not working on CDT, they have their own research agenda to pay attention to, and it will not be easy find someone who wishes to learn and understand CDT. Of course, doing it by yourself is not impossible -- but it would be very very hard. In my opinion, (generally) one of the biggest obstacles in doing science is how alienating and isolating it can be to work on a narrow and esoteric problem by yourself (unless you're actively collaborating with someone, nobody else will understand the nuts and bolts of your research).

1 Answer

+ 3 like - 0 dislike

The only place I know that they explicitly do causal dynamical triangulations is the Radboud University in Nijmegen, and especially Renate Loll. Jan Ambjørn is another expert on the subject but to what I know no recent PhD theses have been advertised (for the last 3 years at least) at NBI for this subject. The problem, as with other approaches of quantum gravity that the great majority of the community has strong reasons to believe that their are not valid and this directly influences PhD jobs and even worse Postdoc jobs. If there are 5 places in the world to do LQG there is only about 1-2 to do CDT for a postdoc so if I were you I would put a lot (but a lot) thought into it.

answered Jan 5, 2015 by Outlander (95 points) [ revision history ]
edited May 7, 2015 by Arnold Neumaier

Your answer

Please use answers only to (at least partly) answer questions. To comment, discuss, or ask for clarification, leave a comment instead.
To mask links under text, please type your text, highlight it, and click the "link" button. You can then enter your link URL.
Please consult the FAQ for as to how to format your post.
This is the answer box; if you want to write a comment instead, please use the 'add comment' button.
Live preview (may slow down editor)   Preview
Your name to display (optional):
Privacy: Your email address will only be used for sending these notifications.
Anti-spam verification:
If you are a human please identify the position of the character covered by the symbol $\varnothing$ in the following word:
Then drag the red bullet below over the corresponding character of our banner. When you drop it there, the bullet changes to green (on slow internet connections after a few seconds).
Please complete the anti-spam verification

user contributions licensed under cc by-sa 3.0 with attribution required

Your rights