• Register
PhysicsOverflow is a next-generation academic platform for physicists and astronomers, including a community peer review system and a postgraduate-level discussion forum analogous to MathOverflow.

Welcome to PhysicsOverflow! PhysicsOverflow is an open platform for community peer review and graduate-level Physics discussion.

Please help promote PhysicsOverflow ads elsewhere if you like it.


New printer friendly PO pages!

Migration to Bielefeld University was successful!

Please vote for this year's PhysicsOverflow ads!

Please do help out in categorising submissions. Submit a paper to PhysicsOverflow!

... see more

Tools for paper authors

Submit paper
Claim Paper Authorship

Tools for SE users

Search User
Reclaim SE Account
Request Account Merger
Nativise imported posts
Claim post (deleted users)
Import SE post

Users whose questions have been imported from Physics Stack Exchange, Theoretical Physics Stack Exchange, or any other Stack Exchange site are kindly requested to reclaim their account and not to register as a new user.

Public \(\beta\) tools

Report a bug with a feature
Request a new functionality
404 page design
Send feedback


(propose a free ad)

Site Statistics

174 submissions , 137 unreviewed
4,308 questions , 1,640 unanswered
5,089 answers , 21,602 comments
1,470 users with positive rep
635 active unimported users
More ...

  What is the difference between $N=(2,2)$ with $N=(2,2)^*$?

+ 2 like - 0 dislike

What is the difference between $N=(2,2)$ with $N=(2,2)^*$? In some sense, i heard, they are totally different theory. I heard from breaking of $N=(4,4)$ supersymmetry it comes $N=(2,2)^*$. What is the crucial difference between $N=(2,2)$ with $N=(2,2)^*$?

This post imported from StackExchange Physics at 2014-10-01 04:28 (UTC), posted by SE-user phy_math
asked Sep 30, 2014 in Theoretical Physics by phy_math (185 points) [ no revision ]
Please consider adding relevant links and explanations to your question, it is currently quite unclear what the $N = (k,l)$ are that you are talking about.

This post imported from StackExchange Physics at 2014-10-01 04:28 (UTC), posted by SE-user ACuriousMind

Why is there a flag on ACuriousMind's comment? It seems like a legitimate concern.

I got rid of it by adding a +1. :-)

1 Answer

+ 2 like - 0 dislike

I am assuming that you are talking about two-dimensional supersymmetry. While I haven't seen the usage $(2,2)^*$ -- my guess is that it refers to a theory with higher supersymmetry, say $(4,4)$ that is broken to $(2,2)$ by adding some terms that explicitly break it to $(4.4)$. In other words, the spectrum of fields is that of $(4,4)$ but the interactions are $(2,2)$. These are special cases of $(2,2)$ theories since not all $(2,2)$ theories arise in this way.

Remark:  Many $(2,2)$ (resp. $(4,4)$)) theories arise via dimensional reduction of four-dimensional $\mathcal{N}=1$ (resp. $\mathcal{N}=2$) supersymmetric theories. 

answered Oct 1, 2014 by suresh (1,545 points) [ revision history ]
edited Oct 2, 2014 by suresh

Some explicit example of breaking of $(4,4)$ to $(2,2)$ which I think is called $(2,2)^*$. The $(4,4)$ vector multiplet is made of  one $(2,2)$ vector multiplet and one chiral multiplet. It is possible to break $(4,4)$ to $(2,2)$ by giving a mass to the chiral multiplet. 

Hi please explain the notation used. What are the 2 numbers in the bracket

The numbers in the brackets denote the number of supersymmetries (left,right).

Please log in or register to answer this question.

user contributions licensed under cc by-sa 3.0 with attribution required

Your rights