I know there are a number of questions about the asymptoticity of perturbative series and about instantons on StackExchange (e.g. Instantons and Non Perturbative Amplitudes in Gravity from user566, Instantons and Borel Resummation asked by felix, and How can an asymptotic expansion give an extremely accurate predication, as in QED? asked by yonni). Reading them was helpful but left me with two short questions:
1) What is meant by "ambiguity" in this context? Several posters use the term in alluding to the problems in asymptotic series. Does it have a technical meaning here?
2) How can we see that the instantons would "correct" the series in the full theory?
Perhaps the only thing to do is to read these notes ("Instantons and large N" by Marino) (which I plan on doing) but I was wondering if someone could give a quick answer for #1 and perhaps a clever or intuitive way of making #2 plausible.
This post imported from StackExchange Physics at 2014-08-07 15:39 (UCT), posted by SE-user gn0m0n