Quantcast
  • Register
PhysicsOverflow is a next-generation academic platform for physicists and astronomers, including a community peer review system and a postgraduate-level discussion forum analogous to MathOverflow.

Welcome to PhysicsOverflow! PhysicsOverflow is an open platform for community peer review and graduate-level Physics discussion.

Please help promote PhysicsOverflow ads elsewhere if you like it.

News

New printer friendly PO pages!

Migration to Bielefeld University was successful!

Please vote for this year's PhysicsOverflow ads!

Please do help out in categorising submissions. Submit a paper to PhysicsOverflow!

... see more

Tools for paper authors

Submit paper
Claim Paper Authorship

Tools for SE users

Search User
Reclaim SE Account
Request Account Merger
Nativise imported posts
Claim post (deleted users)
Import SE post

Users whose questions have been imported from Physics Stack Exchange, Theoretical Physics Stack Exchange, or any other Stack Exchange site are kindly requested to reclaim their account and not to register as a new user.

Public \(\beta\) tools

Report a bug with a feature
Request a new functionality
404 page design
Send feedback

Attributions

(propose a free ad)

Site Statistics

145 submissions , 122 unreviewed
3,930 questions , 1,398 unanswered
4,873 answers , 20,701 comments
1,470 users with positive rep
502 active unimported users
More ...

Does our editor's example equation need to be changed to something else?

+ 1 like - 0 dislike
382 views

Currently, when one clicks the \(\TeX\) button while writing a post, one is presented with the example  of a solution to a second-order polynomial equation. 

\(x = {-b \pm \sqrt{b^2-4ac} \over 2a}\)

PolarKernel asked on the thread; Public Beta Feature Requests whether we want a more physics-ish or high-level example equation instead.  

I see that we could have one of the following kinds of example equation:  

  • Functional ones; common examples, like our current example equation.  
  • Physics-ish fun ones, say, something like \(\left\langle \mathcal{T}\left\{ \exp\left(\int \mathrm{d}x^D J_{4D}(x)\mathcal{O}(x)\right) \right\} \right\rangle_{\mathrm{CFT}} = Z_{\mathrm{AdS}}\left[\lim_{\mathrm{boundary}} J \omega^{\Delta-D+n } = J_{4D}\right]\) (from AdS/CFT) 
  • Commonly used, useful equations, e.g. Dirac Field Lagrangian, or Polyakov Action, or something like that.  
  • Solely to show some of the features of MathJax; e.g. \( {\mathcal{L}} = \left[ {\begin{array}{*{20}{c}}{2k\sum\limits_\pi ^\infty {{\Gamma ^{\int {\rm{d}} {\mathbb{F}}}}} }&0\\0&1\end{array}} \right] \)
  • Something creative and fun; here's a dumb thing I thought of: \(\bf{{MaThJaX}^{-1}\lvert p\hbar0\rangle}=0\).  

Commonly used equations may be advantageous because they may reduce equation-typesetting time. But with different conventions used, etc., it may not turn out to be very useful eventually.  

Physics-ish equations may help ward off low-level questions, and give the message that "this is not the place for your question", which is good. 

The creative and fun things are useless but fun.  

So, please propose example equations, or say "I'd rather stick to our current, functional, example equation." if you prefer.  

asked Apr 23, 2014 in Discussion by dimension10 (1,950 points) [ no revision ]
Haha, the one from AdS/CFT is cool :-)

@Dilaton I have proposed it below.  

1 Answer

+ 1 like - 0 dislike

I propose that we use this equation: 

\(\left\langle \mathcal{T}\left\{ \exp\left(\int \mathrm{d}x^D J_{4D}(x)\mathcal{O}(x)\right) \right\} \right\rangle_{\mathrm{CFT}} = Z_{\mathrm{AdS}}\left[\lim_{\mathrm{boundary}} J \omega^{\Delta-D+n } = J_{4D}\right]\)

answered Apr 28, 2014 by dimension10 (1,950 points) [ no revision ]

Your answer

Please use answers only to (at least partly) answer questions. To comment, discuss, or ask for clarification, leave a comment instead.
To mask links under text, please type your text, highlight it, and click the "link" button. You can then enter your link URL.
Please consult the FAQ for as to how to format your post.
This is the answer box; if you want to write a comment instead, please use the 'add comment' button.
Live preview (may slow down editor)   Preview
Your name to display (optional):
Privacy: Your email address will only be used for sending these notifications.
Anti-spam verification:
If you are a human please identify the position of the character covered by the symbol $\varnothing$ in the following word:
p$\hbar$ysicsOverfl$\varnothing$w
Then drag the red bullet below over the corresponding character of our banner. When you drop it there, the bullet changes to green (on slow internet connections after a few seconds).
To avoid this verification in future, please log in or register.




user contributions licensed under cc by-sa 3.0 with attribution required

Your rights
...