Quantcast
  • Register
PhysicsOverflow is a next-generation academic platform for physicists and astronomers, including a community peer review system and a postgraduate-level discussion forum analogous to MathOverflow.

Welcome to PhysicsOverflow! PhysicsOverflow is an open platform for community peer review and graduate-level Physics discussion.

Please help promote PhysicsOverflow ads elsewhere if you like it.

News

New printer friendly PO pages!

Migration to Bielefeld University was successful!

Please vote for this year's PhysicsOverflow ads!

Please do help out in categorising submissions. Submit a paper to PhysicsOverflow!

... see more

Tools for paper authors

Submit paper
Claim Paper Authorship

Tools for SE users

Search User
Reclaim SE Account
Request Account Merger
Nativise imported posts
Claim post (deleted users)
Import SE post

Users whose questions have been imported from Physics Stack Exchange, Theoretical Physics Stack Exchange, or any other Stack Exchange site are kindly requested to reclaim their account and not to register as a new user.

Public \(\beta\) tools

Report a bug with a feature
Request a new functionality
404 page design
Send feedback

Attributions

(propose a free ad)

Site Statistics

145 submissions , 122 unreviewed
3,930 questions , 1,398 unanswered
4,873 answers , 20,701 comments
1,470 users with positive rep
502 active unimported users
More ...

Double variation of Schwinger action principle

+ 1 like - 0 dislike
64 views

The Schwinger action principle is given by $$\delta_{1}\big\langle b\big|a\big\rangle= i\int_{t_{a}}^{t_{b}}\text{d}t\,\sum_{c,d}\big\langle b\big|c\big\rangle\big\langle c\big|\delta_{1}L(t)\big|d\big\rangle\big\langle d\big|a\big\rangle$$ where the state $|c\big\rangle$ is in time $t_c$ and so on.
Now we perform another variation $\delta_{2}$ which is independent of the first variation $\delta_{1}$ $$\delta_{2}\delta_{1}\big\langle b\big|a\big\rangle= i\int_{t_{a}}^{t_{b}}\text{d}t\,\sum_{c,d}\bigg[\bigg(\delta_{2}\big\langle b\big|c\big\rangle\bigg)\big\langle c\big|\delta_{1}L(t)\big|d\big\rangle\big\langle d\big|a\big\rangle +\big\langle b\big|c\big\rangle\big\langle c\big|\delta_{1}L(t)\big|d\big\rangle\bigg(\delta_{2}\big\langle d\big|a\big\rangle\bigg)\bigg]$$.
Tom D.J. writes (in the book "The Schwinger Action Principle and Effective Action" page: 345.) "Note that since the second variation in the structure of the Lagrangian is independent of the first, there is no term like $\delta_2\big\langle c\big|\delta_{1}L(t)\big|d\big\rangle$ in the above equation."
Could someone elaborate on this and maybe show with an example why this is true?

The closest I could think of was something of the lines "$\delta_{2}\big\langle c\big|\delta_{1}L(t)\big|d\big\rangle=0$ since if $\delta_{2}$ and $\delta_{1}$ are with respect to different functions this term will be zero. If they are variations of the same variables this will be of second order and will be ignored"

This post imported from StackExchange Physics at 2014-04-20 15:03 (UCT), posted by SE-user Natanael
asked Nov 10, 2013 in Theoretical Physics by Natanael (75 points) [ no revision ]

1 Answer

+ 1 like - 0 dislike

Well, it becomes a bit clearer when we see the final formulas of Ref. 1:

$$\delta \langle a_f , t_f |a_i , t_i \rangle ~=~ \frac{i}{\hbar} \int_{t_i}^{t_f} \! dt \langle a_f , t_f | \delta L(t) |a_i , t_i \rangle \tag{7.126} $$

$$ \delta^{\prime} \delta \langle a_f , t_f |a_i , t_i \rangle ~=~\frac{1}{2}\left(\frac{i}{\hbar}\right)^2 \int_{t_i}^{t_f} \! dt \int_{t_i}^{t_f} \!dt^{\prime} $$ $$\times \langle a_f , t_f |T[ \delta L(t)~\delta^{\prime}L(t^{\prime}) ] |a_i , t_i \rangle. \tag{7.131}$$

Recall that the Schwinger action principle can be described via a time integral $\int_{t_i}^{t_f}\!dt~ \delta L(t)$ of an operator $\delta L(t)$. Imagine that the time interval

$$[t_i,t_f]~=~\cup_{n=1}^N I_n, \qquad I_n~:=~[t_{n-1},t_n],$$

is divided into a sufficiently fine discretization $t_i=t_0<t_1, \ldots t_{N-1} < t_N=t_f $, where the integer $N$ is sufficiently large.

By inserting many completeness identities $\sum_b |b , t_n \rangle\langle b , t_n |={\bf 1}$, we can split a total variation (7.126) into many small contribution labelled by the time intervals $I_n$, $n\in\{1,2, \ldots, N\}$.

Similarly, when performing a double variation (7.131), we will get $N$ diagonal and $N(N-1)$ off-diagonal contributions labelled by two time intervals $I_n$ and $I_m$, where $n,m\in\{1,2, \ldots, N\}$. (A diagonal contribution $n=m$ refers to the same time interval $I_n=I_m$.) If in the limit $N\to\infty$, the $N(N-1)$ off-diagonal contributions dominate over the $N$ diagonal contributions, the two variations becomes effectively independent.

However in hindsight, it seems that Ref. 1 is assuming that the two variation $\delta$ and $\delta^{\prime}$ are manifestly independent and not just effectively independent. Manifest independence here means that the $\delta^{\prime}$ variation simply doesn't act on the $\delta L(t)$ operator, and vice-versa.

References:

  1. D.J. Toms, The Schwinger Action Principle and Effective Action, 1997, Section 7.6.
This post imported from StackExchange Physics at 2014-04-20 15:03 (UCT), posted by SE-user Qmechanic
answered Nov 10, 2013 by Qmechanic (2,790 points) [ no revision ]
What would cause us to get off-diagonal contributions?

This post imported from StackExchange Physics at 2014-04-20 15:03 (UCT), posted by SE-user Natanael
I updated the answer. The generic contribution is off-diagonal.

This post imported from StackExchange Physics at 2014-04-20 15:03 (UCT), posted by SE-user Qmechanic

Your answer

Please use answers only to (at least partly) answer questions. To comment, discuss, or ask for clarification, leave a comment instead.
To mask links under text, please type your text, highlight it, and click the "link" button. You can then enter your link URL.
Please consult the FAQ for as to how to format your post.
This is the answer box; if you want to write a comment instead, please use the 'add comment' button.
Live preview (may slow down editor)   Preview
Your name to display (optional):
Privacy: Your email address will only be used for sending these notifications.
Anti-spam verification:
If you are a human please identify the position of the character covered by the symbol $\varnothing$ in the following word:
$\varnothing\hbar$ysicsOverflow
Then drag the red bullet below over the corresponding character of our banner. When you drop it there, the bullet changes to green (on slow internet connections after a few seconds).
To avoid this verification in future, please log in or register.




user contributions licensed under cc by-sa 3.0 with attribution required

Your rights
...