Quantcast
  • Register
PhysicsOverflow is a next-generation academic platform for physicists and astronomers, including a community peer review system and a postgraduate-level discussion forum analogous to MathOverflow.

Welcome to PhysicsOverflow! PhysicsOverflow is an open platform for community peer review and graduate-level Physics discussion.

Please help promote PhysicsOverflow ads elsewhere if you like it.

News

New printer friendly PO pages!

Migration to Bielefeld University was successful!

Please vote for this year's PhysicsOverflow ads!

Please do help out in categorising submissions. Submit a paper to PhysicsOverflow!

... see more

Tools for paper authors

Submit paper
Claim Paper Authorship

Tools for SE users

Search User
Reclaim SE Account
Request Account Merger
Nativise imported posts
Claim post (deleted users)
Import SE post

Users whose questions have been imported from Physics Stack Exchange, Theoretical Physics Stack Exchange, or any other Stack Exchange site are kindly requested to reclaim their account and not to register as a new user.

Public \(\beta\) tools

Report a bug with a feature
Request a new functionality
404 page design
Send feedback

Attributions

(propose a free ad)

Site Statistics

145 submissions , 122 unreviewed
3,930 questions , 1,398 unanswered
4,862 answers , 20,637 comments
1,470 users with positive rep
502 active unimported users
More ...

Minimal vs. Non-minimal coupling

+ 1 like - 1 dislike
82 views

What is the difference between Minimal vs. Non-minimal coupling in General Relativity? A brief introduction to Minimal Coupling in General Relativity could be useful too.

This post imported from StackExchange Physics at 2014-04-18 05:47 (UCT), posted by SE-user user38032
asked Mar 17, 2014 in Theoretical Physics by user38032 (10 points) [ no revision ]
retagged Apr 19, 2014 by dimension10
I think its best to not get to caught up in this question in the specific context of GR. That is, look at the question in the more general context of gauge theories and effective field theory. For a discussion, see the reference: arxiv.org/abs/1305.0017

This post imported from StackExchange Physics at 2014-04-18 05:47 (UCT), posted by SE-user DJBunk

1 Answer

+ 1 like - 0 dislike

I'll give as example the case of a scalar field. We assume the Einstein-Hilbert action: \begin{equation} S_{\text{grav}}=\int d^4x\ \sqrt{|g|}R \end{equation} Now, we would like to consider a quantum field in the spacetime: $$S=S_{\text{grav}}+S_{\text{matter}}+S_{\text{coupling}}$$ To first order in the curvature, the only scalar that couples gravity and the quantum field, which we can build out of a scalar field $\phi$ and curvature-related tensor objects, is $R \phi$. In general, there will be higher order terms if one considers higher energies. We will take the standard Lagrangian for a scalar field. The total action is now \begin{equation} S=\int d^4x \sqrt{|g|}\bigl(R+\frac{1}{2}g^{\mu\nu}\nabla_\mu\phi\nabla_\nu\phi+m^2\phi^2+\xi R\phi\bigr) \end{equation} Where $\xi$ is the coupling constant. Minimal coupling amounts to setting $\xi=0$. As you can imagine, this is the simplest (and perhaps most natural?) case. Another reasonably popular choice seems to be $\xi=\frac{1}{6}$. In this case, we say that the field is conformally coupled to gravity, because the action is now invariant under conformal transformations of the metric: $$ g_{\mu\nu}\rightarrow \Omega^2(x)g_{\mu\nu}$$ Any possible $\xi\neq 0$ is a case of non-minimal coupling. Basically, minimal coupling means avoiding introducing any extra terms in the action.

This post imported from StackExchange Physics at 2014-04-18 05:47 (UCT), posted by SE-user Danu
answered Mar 17, 2014 by UnknownToSE (505 points) [ no revision ]
Danu, could please explain the difference between setting $\xi=0$ and $\xi\neq0$

This post imported from StackExchange Physics at 2014-04-18 05:47 (UCT), posted by SE-user user38032
Well, obviously the difference is whether the field directly couples to gravity or not.

This post imported from StackExchange Physics at 2014-04-18 05:47 (UCT), posted by SE-user Danu
Donu, What is the physical interpretation for a field to directly couple to gravity.

This post imported from StackExchange Physics at 2014-04-18 05:47 (UCT), posted by SE-user user38032

Your answer

Please use answers only to (at least partly) answer questions. To comment, discuss, or ask for clarification, leave a comment instead.
To mask links under text, please type your text, highlight it, and click the "link" button. You can then enter your link URL.
Please consult the FAQ for as to how to format your post.
This is the answer box; if you want to write a comment instead, please use the 'add comment' button.
Live preview (may slow down editor)   Preview
Your name to display (optional):
Privacy: Your email address will only be used for sending these notifications.
Anti-spam verification:
If you are a human please identify the position of the character covered by the symbol $\varnothing$ in the following word:
p$\hbar\varnothing$sicsOverflow
Then drag the red bullet below over the corresponding character of our banner. When you drop it there, the bullet changes to green (on slow internet connections after a few seconds).
To avoid this verification in future, please log in or register.




user contributions licensed under cc by-sa 3.0 with attribution required

Your rights
...