Welcome to PhysicsOverflow! PhysicsOverflow is an open platform for community peer review and graduate-level Physics discussion.

Please help promote PhysicsOverflow ads elsewhere if you like it.

PO is now at the Physics Department of Bielefeld University!

New printer friendly PO pages!

Migration to Bielefeld University was successful!

Please vote for this year's PhysicsOverflow ads!

Please do help out in categorising submissions. Submit a paper to PhysicsOverflow!

... see more

(propose a free ad)

In this physicsforums post (post #10), @samalkhaiat states that the Goldstone bosons can be parameterized by a matrix acting on the vacuum state (which in general can be represented by some vector, $\vec{v}$).

Explicitly the user claims that we can write,

where $g (x) $, if I understand correctly, are the group generators of the unbroken group. How come this is justified?

Let $H\subset G$ be the subgroup that acts trivially on $\vec{v}$ i.e., $R(h)_{i,j} v_j = v_i$. You can choose the most general $g(x)\in G$. However, any two elements $g(x)$ and $g'(x)=g(x)h(x)$ give rise to the same $\phi_i(x) = R(g(x))_{i,j} v_j$. This freedom shows that the fluctuations about a vacuum solution are parametrized by elements of the coset $G/H$. We can write (for a Lie group) $g(x) =\exp(i \sum_a \theta_a(x) T_a)$, where the sum runs of the generators of $G$ that are not in $H$ (somewhat loose terminology) and $\theta_a(x)$ parametrize the Goldstone modes.

user contributions licensed under cc by-sa 3.0 with attribution required