Quantcast
  • Register
PhysicsOverflow is a next-generation academic platform for physicists and astronomers, including a community peer review system and a postgraduate-level discussion forum analogous to MathOverflow.

Welcome to PhysicsOverflow! PhysicsOverflow is an open platform for community peer review and graduate-level Physics discussion.

Please help promote PhysicsOverflow ads elsewhere if you like it.

News

New printer friendly PO pages!

Migration to Bielefeld University was successful!

Please vote for this year's PhysicsOverflow ads!

Please do help out in categorising submissions. Submit a paper to PhysicsOverflow!

... see more

Tools for paper authors

Submit paper
Claim Paper Authorship

Tools for SE users

Search User
Reclaim SE Account
Request Account Merger
Nativise imported posts
Claim post (deleted users)
Import SE post

Users whose questions have been imported from Physics Stack Exchange, Theoretical Physics Stack Exchange, or any other Stack Exchange site are kindly requested to reclaim their account and not to register as a new user.

Public \(\beta\) tools

Report a bug with a feature
Request a new functionality
404 page design
Send feedback

Attributions

(propose a free ad)

Site Statistics

145 submissions , 122 unreviewed
3,930 questions , 1,398 unanswered
4,873 answers , 20,701 comments
1,470 users with positive rep
502 active unimported users
More ...

Why must an integrating sphere be a sphere?

+ 5 like - 0 dislike
1808 views

Why must an integrating sphere be a sphere? Why can't it be an integrating cube? What is the difference? Could I use a cube to measure total illuminance like an integrating sphere does?

enter image description here

This post imported from StackExchange Physics at 2014-04-13 14:42 (UCT), posted by SE-user dartheize
asked Apr 6, 2014 in Experimental Physics by dartheize (25 points) [ no revision ]
retagged Apr 13, 2014
Your question is very difficult to understand, as it is unclear what you're asking. Can you phrase your question more clearly?

This post imported from StackExchange Physics at 2014-04-13 14:42 (UCT), posted by SE-user Draksis
@ChrisMueller: Touche. I see your edit now and that makes a bit more sense. I've deleted my completely irrelevant answer :(

This post imported from StackExchange Physics at 2014-04-13 14:42 (UCT), posted by SE-user Kyle Kanos
@Draksis: Sorry for my unclear question

This post imported from StackExchange Physics at 2014-04-13 14:42 (UCT), posted by SE-user dartheize
@ChrisMueller: Thanks for editing my question

This post imported from StackExchange Physics at 2014-04-13 14:42 (UCT), posted by SE-user dartheize
@user40847 You're welcome. Welcome to phys.SE!

This post imported from StackExchange Physics at 2014-04-13 14:42 (UCT), posted by SE-user Chris Mueller

2 Answers

+ 6 like - 0 dislike

Surface coating of an integrating sphere is optimized for low losses. This white coating (barium sulfate or PTFE) acts like an ideal lambertian scatterer.

Lambertian scatterer

  • all light is scattered (Ok, not 100%, but a very high percentage like 99,5%. See ressources)
  • it is emitted in the hemisphere following the cosine law: perpendicular to the surface it's highest. Intensity decresease follows a cosine law.

First generation stray light (blue in OP's picture) shows this light cone. Imagine this cone at the corner of a cube: some light will hit a wall again and suffers tiny losses. Detector port in cubic geometry hat a lower propability to to be hit with the ray of highest energy. With a sphere however all surface normal vectors point to its center. Remember, that these rays "carry more energy" according to Lambert's cosine law. It will have lower losses than a measurement head with a cube geometry. A spherical geometry reduces the necessary number of stray events.

Ressources

This post imported from StackExchange Physics at 2014-04-13 14:42 (UCT), posted by SE-user Stefan Bischof
answered Apr 6, 2014 by Stefan Bischof (60 points) [ no revision ]
Thank you very much, you enlighten me!

This post imported from StackExchange Physics at 2014-04-13 14:42 (UCT), posted by SE-user dartheize
+ 3 like - 0 dislike

In a sphere, any light emitted from the center will reflect off the sides at normal incidence come back to the center. In a cube, some rays never return to the center, so you aren't measuring all of the light emitted, which defeats the purpose of the device.

This post imported from StackExchange Physics at 2014-04-13 14:42 (UCT), posted by SE-user George G
answered Apr 6, 2014 by George G (30 points) [ no revision ]
Your answer is straight forward and also right. But I prefer another answer because it's more detailed. But thanks anyway! :)

This post imported from StackExchange Physics at 2014-04-13 14:42 (UCT), posted by SE-user dartheize

Your answer

Please use answers only to (at least partly) answer questions. To comment, discuss, or ask for clarification, leave a comment instead.
To mask links under text, please type your text, highlight it, and click the "link" button. You can then enter your link URL.
Please consult the FAQ for as to how to format your post.
This is the answer box; if you want to write a comment instead, please use the 'add comment' button.
Live preview (may slow down editor)   Preview
Your name to display (optional):
Privacy: Your email address will only be used for sending these notifications.
Anti-spam verification:
If you are a human please identify the position of the character covered by the symbol $\varnothing$ in the following word:
p$\varnothing$ysicsOverflow
Then drag the red bullet below over the corresponding character of our banner. When you drop it there, the bullet changes to green (on slow internet connections after a few seconds).
To avoid this verification in future, please log in or register.




user contributions licensed under cc by-sa 3.0 with attribution required

Your rights
...