Quantcast
  • Register
PhysicsOverflow is a next-generation academic platform for physicists and astronomers, including a community peer review system and a postgraduate-level discussion forum analogous to MathOverflow.

Welcome to PhysicsOverflow! PhysicsOverflow is an open platform for community peer review and graduate-level Physics discussion.

Please help promote PhysicsOverflow ads elsewhere if you like it.

News

New printer friendly PO pages!

Migration to Bielefeld University was successful!

Please vote for this year's PhysicsOverflow ads!

Please do help out in categorising submissions. Submit a paper to PhysicsOverflow!

... see more

Tools for paper authors

Submit paper
Claim Paper Authorship

Tools for SE users

Search User
Reclaim SE Account
Request Account Merger
Nativise imported posts
Claim post (deleted users)
Import SE post

Users whose questions have been imported from Physics Stack Exchange, Theoretical Physics Stack Exchange, or any other Stack Exchange site are kindly requested to reclaim their account and not to register as a new user.

Public \(\beta\) tools

Report a bug with a feature
Request a new functionality
404 page design
Send feedback

Attributions

(propose a free ad)

Site Statistics

145 submissions , 122 unreviewed
3,930 questions , 1,398 unanswered
4,853 answers , 20,624 comments
1,470 users with positive rep
501 active unimported users
More ...

Chiral coupling in string-nets

+ 7 like - 0 dislike
357 views

In Xiao-Gang Wen's review of topological order http://arxiv.org/abs/1210.1281 , he states in footnote 52 that string-nets are so far unable to produce the chiral coupling between the SU(2) gauge boson and the fermions. Is it known how this chiral coupling can be expressed in lattice gauge theory, and the remaining question is one of emergence; or is it the case that its expression in lattice gauge theory is unknown, analogous to the chiral fermion question which took many years to solve?

This post imported from StackExchange Physics at 2014-04-05 03:57 (UCT), posted by SE-user Andrew Tan
asked Jan 5, 2013 in Theoretical Physics by Andrew Tan (65 points) [ no revision ]
My impression is that we have the same problem in lattice gauge theory, which is so far unable to produce the chiral coupling between the SU(2) gauge boson and the fermions. I understand that there is some progress, but I do not know if the problem is fully solved.

This post imported from StackExchange Physics at 2014-04-05 03:57 (UCT), posted by SE-user Xiao-Gang Wen
Thanks for the reply! As you say, it does seem not fully solved yet. Kaplan's review arxiv.org/abs/0912.2560 says "there is currently no practical way to regulate general nonabelian chiral gauge theories on the lattice." Poppitz and Shang arxiv.org/abs/1003.5896 say "we do not yet have a method of approximating an arbitrary chiral gauge theory by latticizing and then simulating it on a computer|even in principle."

This post imported from StackExchange Physics at 2014-04-05 03:57 (UCT), posted by SE-user Andrew Tan

1 Answer

+ 3 like - 0 dislike

The chiral-fermion/chiral-gauge-theory problem is solved: any anomaly-free chiral gauge theories can be put on lattice by simply turning on a proper interaction. See my new papers http://arxiv.org/abs/1305.1045 and http://arxiv.org/abs/1303.1803

As a result, the string-net theory can also produce the coupling between the SU(2) gauge boson and the chiral fermions.

This post imported from StackExchange Physics at 2014-04-05 03:57 (UCT), posted by SE-user Xiao-Gang Wen
answered May 9, 2013 by Xiao-Gang Wen (3,319 points) [ no revision ]
(btw. also found,) See also this paper: 1307.7480 - A Lattice Non-Perturbative Definition of 1+1D Anomaly-Free Chiral Fermions and Bosons

This post imported from StackExchange Physics at 2014-04-05 03:57 (UCT), posted by SE-user cycles

Your answer

Please use answers only to (at least partly) answer questions. To comment, discuss, or ask for clarification, leave a comment instead.
To mask links under text, please type your text, highlight it, and click the "link" button. You can then enter your link URL.
Please consult the FAQ for as to how to format your post.
This is the answer box; if you want to write a comment instead, please use the 'add comment' button.
Live preview (may slow down editor)   Preview
Your name to display (optional):
Privacy: Your email address will only be used for sending these notifications.
Anti-spam verification:
If you are a human please identify the position of the character covered by the symbol $\varnothing$ in the following word:
$\varnothing\hbar$ysicsOverflow
Then drag the red bullet below over the corresponding character of our banner. When you drop it there, the bullet changes to green (on slow internet connections after a few seconds).
To avoid this verification in future, please log in or register.




user contributions licensed under cc by-sa 3.0 with attribution required

Your rights
...