• Register
PhysicsOverflow is a next-generation academic platform for physicists and astronomers, including a community peer review system and a postgraduate-level discussion forum analogous to MathOverflow.

Welcome to PhysicsOverflow! PhysicsOverflow is an open platform for community peer review and graduate-level Physics discussion.

Please help promote PhysicsOverflow ads elsewhere if you like it.


PO is now at the Physics Department of Bielefeld University!

New printer friendly PO pages!

Migration to Bielefeld University was successful!

Please vote for this year's PhysicsOverflow ads!

Please do help out in categorising submissions. Submit a paper to PhysicsOverflow!

... see more

Tools for paper authors

Submit paper
Claim Paper Authorship

Tools for SE users

Search User
Reclaim SE Account
Request Account Merger
Nativise imported posts
Claim post (deleted users)
Import SE post

Users whose questions have been imported from Physics Stack Exchange, Theoretical Physics Stack Exchange, or any other Stack Exchange site are kindly requested to reclaim their account and not to register as a new user.

Public \(\beta\) tools

Report a bug with a feature
Request a new functionality
404 page design
Send feedback


(propose a free ad)

Site Statistics

205 submissions , 163 unreviewed
5,054 questions , 2,207 unanswered
5,347 answers , 22,720 comments
1,470 users with positive rep
818 active unimported users
More ...

  what is the relationship between the dynamical casimir effect and virtual particles?

+ 2 like - 0 dislike

Since virtual particles are disturbances in a field, and not particles in any sense, as explained here, how is it that true photons arise from them when excited with kinetic energy via the dynamical casimir effect?

While the effect is described here, I was hoping to get an answer that touches more with the virtual particle's role in the effect, if it is of sigificance.

This post imported from StackExchange Physics at 2014-04-01 13:25 (UCT), posted by SE-user jzn
asked Jun 13, 2012 in Theoretical Physics by jzn (10 points) [ no revision ]

2 Answers

+ 2 like - 0 dislike

All interactions at the quantum dynamical level are subject to an analysis with Feynman diagrams, and the Casimir effect is not different in this case. Virtual pairs are internal lines in Feynman diagrams.

R.L.Jaffe has a arXiv paper that goes into the detail on the Casimir force and corresponding diagrams.

the abstract:

In discussions of the cosmological constant, the Casimir effect is often invoked as decisive evidence that the zero point energies of quantum fields are "real''. On the contrary, Casimir effects can be formulated and Casimir forces can be computed without reference to zero point energies. They are relativistic, quantum forces between charges and currents. The Casimir force (per unit area) between parallel plates vanishes as "alpha", the fine structure constant, goes to zero, and the standard result, which appears to be independent of "alpha", corresponds to the "alpha"--> infinity limit.

He separates the Casimir effect from the vacuum fluctuations effect.From the conclusions:

I have presented an argument that the experimental confirmat ion of the Casimir effect does not establish the reality of zero point fluctuations. Casimir forces can be calculated without reference to the vacuum and, like any other dynamical effect in QED, vanish as α→0. The vacuum-to-vacuum graphs (See Fig. 1) that define the zero point energy do not enter the calculation of the Casimir force, which instead only involves graphs with external lines. So the concept of zero point fluctuations is a heuristic and calculational aid in the description of the Casimir effect, but not a necessity.

This post imported from StackExchange Physics at 2014-04-01 13:25 (UCT), posted by SE-user anna v
answered Mar 10, 2013 by anna v (2,005 points) [ no revision ]
+ 0 like - 0 dislike

Your sea of virtual photons normally come in and out of existence in pairs. But with a mirror moving relativistically, those pairs separate and hence become real photons (producing light). This is explained in any paper on the effect, so I advise doing so for better enlightenment.

This post imported from StackExchange Physics at 2014-04-01 13:25 (UCT), posted by SE-user Chris Gerig
answered Jun 13, 2012 by Chris Gerig (590 points) [ no revision ]

Your answer

Please use answers only to (at least partly) answer questions. To comment, discuss, or ask for clarification, leave a comment instead.
To mask links under text, please type your text, highlight it, and click the "link" button. You can then enter your link URL.
Please consult the FAQ for as to how to format your post.
This is the answer box; if you want to write a comment instead, please use the 'add comment' button.
Live preview (may slow down editor)   Preview
Your name to display (optional):
Privacy: Your email address will only be used for sending these notifications.
Anti-spam verification:
If you are a human please identify the position of the character covered by the symbol $\varnothing$ in the following word:
Then drag the red bullet below over the corresponding character of our banner. When you drop it there, the bullet changes to green (on slow internet connections after a few seconds).
Please complete the anti-spam verification

user contributions licensed under cc by-sa 3.0 with attribution required

Your rights