Quantcast
  • Register
PhysicsOverflow is a next-generation academic platform for physicists and astronomers, including a community peer review system and a postgraduate-level discussion forum analogous to MathOverflow.

Welcome to PhysicsOverflow! PhysicsOverflow is an open platform for community peer review and graduate-level Physics discussion.

Please help promote PhysicsOverflow ads elsewhere if you like it.

News

Please vote for this year's PhysicsOverflow ads!

Please do help out in categorising submissions. Submit a paper to PhysicsOverflow!

... see more

Tools for paper authors

Submit paper
Claim Paper Authorship

Tools for SE users

Search User
Reclaim SE Account
Request Account Merger
Nativise imported posts
Claim post (deleted users)
Import SE post

Users whose questions have been imported from Physics Stack Exchange, Theoretical Physics Stack Exchange, or any other Stack Exchange site are kindly requested to reclaim their account and not to register as a new user.

Public \(\beta\) tools

Report a bug with a feature
Request a new functionality
404 page design
Send feedback

Attributions

(propose a free ad)

Site Statistics

126 submissions , 106 unreviewed
3,683 questions , 1,271 unanswered
4,657 answers , 19,739 comments
1,470 users with positive rep
440 active unimported users
More ...

Can the concurrence be calculated in terms of the entanglement of formation?

+ 4 like - 0 dislike
64 views

If I somehow know the entanglement of formation, $E_F$ for two mixed qubits, where

\begin{equation} E_F = -x \log x - (1-x) \log (1-x), \end{equation}

where $x = (1+\sqrt{1-\mathcal{C}^2})/2$ and $\mathcal{C}$ is the concurrence, can I then calculate the concurrence from it? (Rather than calculating the concurrence 'normally' using $\mathcal{C} (\rho) = \max \{ 0, \lambda_1 - \lambda_2 - \lambda_3 - \lambda_4 \}$ where $\lambda_i$ are the square roots of the eigenvalues of $\rho S \rho^* S$ and $S = \sigma_y \otimes \sigma_y$).

This post has been migrated from (A51.SE)
asked Feb 14, 2012 in Theoretical Physics by Calvin (60 points) [ no revision ]

1 Answer

+ 3 like - 0 dislike

Concurrence was introduced exactly in the effort to find an analytic formula for entanglement of formation. Since one is a monotonic function of the other, you can imagine inverting the relation to obtain concurrence from entanglement of formation. Unfortunately the inverse mapping from $E_F$ to $\mathcal{C}$ probably does not look as nice as the mapping in the other direction (form $\mathcal{C}$ to $E_F$ that you know and write above.

This post has been migrated from (A51.SE)
answered Feb 14, 2012 by Marco (260 points) [ no revision ]
Thanks. You're probably right that it won't look as nice, but is there a way of finding the inverse?

This post has been migrated from (A51.SE)
By "does not look as nice as" I actually meant that you cannot write it down as a combination of elementary functions. Even just inverting the binary entropy $-x\log x - (1-x)\log (1-x)$ is not possible in this sense, as far as I know. You can just show that the inverse exists, and maybe calculate some properties, or try to expand it in series, but I believe that's it.

This post has been migrated from (A51.SE)
I plotted $E_F$ against concurrence. The graph looks so well behaved that it seems like there should be an explicit answer! But I think you're right that there isn't. Thanks for your answer.

This post has been migrated from (A51.SE)

Your answer

Please use answers only to (at least partly) answer questions. To comment, discuss, or ask for clarification, leave a comment instead.
To mask links under text, please type your text, highlight it, and click the "link" button. You can then enter your link URL.
Please consult the FAQ for as to how to format your post.
This is the answer box; if you want to write a comment instead, please use the 'add comment' button.
Live preview (may slow down editor)   Preview
Your name to display (optional):
Privacy: Your email address will only be used for sending these notifications.
Anti-spam verification:
If you are a human please identify the position of the character covered by the symbol $\varnothing$ in the following word:
p$\hbar$ysics$\varnothing$verflow
Then drag the red bullet below over the corresponding character of our banner. When you drop it there, the bullet changes to green (on slow internet connections after a few seconds).
To avoid this verification in future, please log in or register.




user contributions licensed under cc by-sa 3.0 with attribution required

Your rights
...