• Register
PhysicsOverflow is a next-generation academic platform for physicists and astronomers, including a community peer review system and a postgraduate-level discussion forum analogous to MathOverflow.

Welcome to PhysicsOverflow! PhysicsOverflow is an open platform for community peer review and graduate-level Physics discussion.

Please help promote PhysicsOverflow ads elsewhere if you like it.


Migration to Bielefeld University was successful!

Please vote for this year's PhysicsOverflow ads!

Please do help out in categorising submissions. Submit a paper to PhysicsOverflow!

... see more

Tools for paper authors

Submit paper
Claim Paper Authorship

Tools for SE users

Search User
Reclaim SE Account
Request Account Merger
Nativise imported posts
Claim post (deleted users)
Import SE post

Users whose questions have been imported from Physics Stack Exchange, Theoretical Physics Stack Exchange, or any other Stack Exchange site are kindly requested to reclaim their account and not to register as a new user.

Public \(\beta\) tools

Report a bug with a feature
Request a new functionality
404 page design
Send feedback


(propose a free ad)

Site Statistics

129 submissions , 109 unreviewed
3,743 questions , 1,307 unanswered
4,705 answers , 19,910 comments
1,470 users with positive rep
460 active unimported users
More ...

Connections and applications of SLE in physics

+ 20 like - 0 dislike

In probability theory, the Schramm–Loewner evolution, also known as stochastic Loewner evolution or SLE, is a conformally invariant stochastic process. It is a family of random planar curves that are generated by solving Loewner's differential equation with Brownian motion as input. The motivation for SLE was as a candidate for the scaling limit of "loop-erased random walk" (LERW) and, later, as a scaling limit of various other planar processes.

My question is about connections of SLE with theoretical physics, applications of SLE to theoretical physics and also applications of (other) theoretical physics to SLE. I will be happy to learn about various examples of such connections/applications preferably described as much as possible in a non-technical way.

This post has been migrated from (A51.SE)
asked Sep 20, 2011 in Theoretical Physics by Gil Kalai (325 points) [ no revision ]
retagged Apr 19, 2014 by dimension10
In some cases SLE lets you compute critical exponents for certain systems. But I am not sure this is an application to theoretical physics as this is "only" rigorous derivation of the basic observations that have been familiar to physicists for decades, mainly using the renormalization group. Indeed, SLE from the mathematical physicist's point of view can be regarded as a rigorous alternative to RG which is quite intractable when one starts to ask what *really* happens as one varies the scale and the answer is that in general pretty much anything can happen :)

This post has been migrated from (A51.SE)

5 Answers

+ 13 like - 0 dislike

Most applications I've heard of are (perhaps predictably) in the context of two dimensional conformal field theories, which by themselves have many applications in physics, from critical phenomena to perturbative string theory. One reference that comes to mind is John Cardy's SLE for Theoretical Physicists. I'll be curious to read other answers with more details...

This post has been migrated from (A51.SE)
answered Sep 20, 2011 by Moshe (2,375 points) [ no revision ]
+ 11 like - 0 dislike

SLEs can be used in order to define a certain kind of QFT.

You can check M. Douglas' talk, from page 28 forward: Foundations of Quantum Field Theory (PDF).

There's also another great article, Conformal invariance and 2D statistical physics. You may also like SLE and the free field: Partition functions and couplings.

Finally, there's an approach to try and define Feynman Path Integrals in a rigorous way called "White Noise Calculus", which has connections to the SLE.

This post has been migrated from (A51.SE)
answered Sep 21, 2011 by Daniel (675 points) [ no revision ]
+ 10 like - 0 dislike

Another use of the SLE approach seems to be (I haven't read the papers below much beyond their abstracts) as a tool to probe for the presence of conformal invariance in various systems, when a direct (numerical or experimental) verification is difficult. In this approach, (i) one extracts suitable non self-crossing paths, (ii) one determines (empirically) their stochastic driving function (in the sense of SLE) and (iii) one compares the latter with brownian motion and, if relevant, extracts the corresponding characterisitic parameter $\kappa$. Examples of such applications are to turbulence (e.g., here and here), disordered spin systems (e.g., here), avalanche frontiers in sandpile models (e.g., here or there).

This post has been migrated from (A51.SE)
answered Sep 21, 2011 by Yvan Velenik (1,110 points) [ no revision ]
+ 5 like - 0 dislike

An application of calculation based on SLE to condensed matter physics is descibed in this talk entitled Conformal Restriction in Condensed Matter Physics by Eldad Batelheim

This post has been migrated from (A51.SE)
answered Sep 24, 2011 by Gil Kalai (325 points) [ no revision ]
+ 5 like - 0 dislike

This answer is really just an amplification of Yvan Velenik's answer, as I feel what the direction of study he briefly mentioned deserves a bit more space here.

A remarkable 2006 Nature Physics paper by Bernard et al kicked off the little subject of finding SLE-like curves in turbulent systems -- here, the authors did a large numerical study of 2D incompressible Navier-Stokes in a turbulent regime, generating large data sets for the vorticity, and then plotted the zero-lines of this scalar field.

One sees curves such as this (red is the actual zero-line, blue is the "outer boundary", green dots are "necks of large fjords and peninsulas"):

figure 3 of Bernard et al

I'll just quote the key figure of the paper with some text from the paper here:

To determine which driving function $\xi(t)$ can generate such a curve, one needs to find the sequence of conformal maps $g_t(z)$ that map the half-plane H minus the curve into H itself. We approximate $g_t(z)$ by a composition of discrete, conformal slit maps that swallow one segment of the curve at a time (a slight variation of the techniques presented in http://www.math.washington.edu/~marshall/preprints/zipper.pdf). This results in a sequence of 'times' $t_i$ and driving values $\xi_i$ that approximate the true driving functions. If the zero-vorticity isolines in the half-plane are actually SLE traces, then the driving function should behave as an effective diffusion process at sufficiently large times. We have collected 1,607 putative traces. The data presented by blue triangles in Fig. 4 show that the ensemble average $\langle \xi(t)^2\rangle$ indeed grows linearly in time: the diffusion coefficient kappa is very close to the value 6, with an accuracy of 5% (see inset).

figure 4 of Bernard et al

Now mean squared displacement versus time is not necessarily the best test for the Loewner driving function to be Brownian motion (though in physics, this is basically all one sees), but still I think this plot is quite amazing.

Regarding this turbulent result though there's no theoretical understanding of why SLE should show up, or even why there should be conformal invariance (not even at the level of physics, despite some 1 2 rather impenetrable (to me) work in this direction by Polyakov).

Now, SLE$_6$ curves are conjectured to be the boundaries of critical percolation clusters (proven by Smirnov in a special case). And there is a well-studied connection between transition to turbulence in pipe flow and directed percolation (see this paper of Sipos and Goldenfeld for some recent nice work). However, I find it hard to relate these two as DP shows up as a property of the dynamics, and the SLE stuff is more about static snapshots of the fluid flow. I would be happy to be proven wrong though.

These results have then been followed up by some experimental work on flows in soap films. Aside: I can't resist pointing out that in the classic 1980 review on 2D turbulence by Kraichnan and Montgomery, it is stated "Two-dimensional turbulence has the special distinction that it is nowhere realised in nature or the laboratory but only in computer simulations." By 1986, this was shown to be quite wrong.

Returning to SLE, similar curves with other values of $\kappa$ were found in several other 2D turbulent models, which I think are mostly summarized by this paper by Falkovich and Musacchio which tries to relate the value of $\kappa$ to some properties of the model.

Thalabard et al published a recent paper in PRL along these lines which found SLE curves in a 3D system after averaging over one direction.

This post has been migrated from (A51.SE)
answered Oct 4, 2011 by j.c. (260 points) [ no revision ]

Your answer

Please use answers only to (at least partly) answer questions. To comment, discuss, or ask for clarification, leave a comment instead.
To mask links under text, please type your text, highlight it, and click the "link" button. You can then enter your link URL.
Please consult the FAQ for as to how to format your post.
This is the answer box; if you want to write a comment instead, please use the 'add comment' button.
Live preview (may slow down editor)   Preview
Your name to display (optional):
Privacy: Your email address will only be used for sending these notifications.
Anti-spam verification:
If you are a human please identify the position of the character covered by the symbol $\varnothing$ in the following word:
Then drag the red bullet below over the corresponding character of our banner. When you drop it there, the bullet changes to green (on slow internet connections after a few seconds).
To avoid this verification in future, please log in or register.

user contributions licensed under cc by-sa 3.0 with attribution required

Your rights