• Register
PhysicsOverflow is a next-generation academic platform for physicists and astronomers, including a community peer review system and a postgraduate-level discussion forum analogous to MathOverflow.

Welcome to PhysicsOverflow! PhysicsOverflow is an open platform for community peer review and graduate-level Physics discussion.

Please help promote PhysicsOverflow ads elsewhere if you like it.


Please vote for this year's PhysicsOverflow ads!

Please do help out in categorising submissions. Submit a paper to PhysicsOverflow!

... see more

Tools for paper authors

Submit paper
Claim Paper Authorship

Tools for SE users

Search User
Reclaim SE Account
Request Account Merger
Nativise imported posts
Claim post (deleted users)
Import SE post

Users whose questions have been imported from Physics Stack Exchange, Theoretical Physics Stack Exchange, or any other Stack Exchange site are kindly requested to reclaim their account and not to register as a new user.

Public \(\beta\) tools

Report a bug with a feature
Request a new functionality
404 page design
Send feedback


(propose a free ad)

Site Statistics

126 submissions , 106 unreviewed
3,683 questions , 1,271 unanswered
4,657 answers , 19,740 comments
1,470 users with positive rep
442 active unimported users
More ...

What is on the AdS side in AdS/CFT supergravity or string theory?

+ 4 like - 0 dislike

What really is on the AdS side in AdS/CFT, does it always have to be string theory or is sometimes supergravity "enough" or better suited to do calculations?

From the answers to my earlier question, I have learned that one can calculate CFT/QFT correlation functions on the boundary from the quantum gravitational partition function valid inside the AdS space by taking the bondery value

$$ <O(x_1)O(x_2)...O(x_n)> \sim \frac{\partial^n Z}{\partial \Phi_0(X_1)\partial \Phi_0(X_2)...\partial \Phi_0(X_n)} $$

Does the action that appears in the partition function on the AdS side

$$ Z = e^{−S(\Phi)} $$

have to come from supergravity or string theory?

When reading about AdS/CFT I have seen it defined with both possibilities and this confuses me.

So when and why does it make a difference, of one assumes strings or supergravity to calculate the partition function on the AdS side? Are there cases when one or the other is more appropriate, simpler, useful, etc?

asked Jun 24, 2013 in Phenomenology by Dilaton (4,250 points) [ revision history ]

1 Answer

+ 5 like - 0 dislike

Since 1998 or earlier, there have been no doubts that the AdS/CFT correspondence provides us with a full non-perturbative definition of string theory on the AdS-like background, including all of (type IIB) stringy objects and interactions and subtleties that we have ever heard of. An obvious reason why the CFT can't be equivalent "just to supergravity" is that the pure supergravity is inconsistent as a quantum theory while the CFT is self-evidently consistent.

The basic relationship between the parameters on both sides of the duality is $$g_{\rm string} = g_{\rm YM}^2, \quad \frac{R^4}{\ell_{\rm string}^4} = g_{\rm YM}^2 N \equiv \lambda $$ So at a fixed $N$, the weak coupling of the Yang-Mills side coincides with the weak string coupling in the type IIB string theory bulk.

When $N$ is allowed to scale to infinity as well, the 't Hooft coupling $\lambda\equiv g_{\rm YM}^2 N$ is what decides whether the loop diagrams are actually suppressed.

You see that when $\lambda$ is smaller (or much smaller) than one, then the Yang-Mills expansion is weakly coupled and the perturbative gauge-theory diagrams are guaranteed to approximate physics well (or very well). On the contrary, when $\lambda$ is greater (or much greater) than one, the AdS radius $R$ is greater (or much greater) than the string length which means that one may approximate the physics by string theory on a "mildly curved" background.

In this limit, when the curvature radius is (much) longer than the string length, it is always possible to approximate low-energy physics of string theory by supergravity. In string theory, the SUGRA approximation means to neglect the $\alpha'$ stringy corrections. In the gauge-theoretical language, it means to focus on the planar limit for large $\lambda$ and neglect $1/N$ nonplanar corrections.

However, it's been demonstrated that all the "beyond supergravity" states you expect to see in the type IIB background appear on both sides of the AdS/CFT correspondence, including arbitrary excited strings) – this is particularly clear in the BMN/pp-wave limit (see also 1,000+ followups) – as well as various wrapped D-branes and, what is critical for the usefulness of the whole AdS/CFT framework, evaporating quantum black holes.

This post imported from StackExchange Physics at 2014-03-11 10:29 (UCT), posted by SE-user Luboš Motl
answered Jun 24, 2013 by Luboš Motl (10,238 points) [ no revision ]

Your answer

Please use answers only to (at least partly) answer questions. To comment, discuss, or ask for clarification, leave a comment instead.
To mask links under text, please type your text, highlight it, and click the "link" button. You can then enter your link URL.
Please consult the FAQ for as to how to format your post.
This is the answer box; if you want to write a comment instead, please use the 'add comment' button.
Live preview (may slow down editor)   Preview
Your name to display (optional):
Privacy: Your email address will only be used for sending these notifications.
Anti-spam verification:
If you are a human please identify the position of the character covered by the symbol $\varnothing$ in the following word:
Then drag the red bullet below over the corresponding character of our banner. When you drop it there, the bullet changes to green (on slow internet connections after a few seconds).
To avoid this verification in future, please log in or register.

user contributions licensed under cc by-sa 3.0 with attribution required

Your rights