• Register
PhysicsOverflow is a next-generation academic platform for physicists and astronomers, including a community peer review system and a postgraduate-level discussion forum analogous to MathOverflow.

Welcome to PhysicsOverflow! PhysicsOverflow is an open platform for community peer review and graduate-level Physics discussion.

Please help promote PhysicsOverflow ads elsewhere if you like it.


PO is now at the Physics Department of Bielefeld University!

New printer friendly PO pages!

Migration to Bielefeld University was successful!

Please vote for this year's PhysicsOverflow ads!

Please do help out in categorising submissions. Submit a paper to PhysicsOverflow!

... see more

Tools for paper authors

Submit paper
Claim Paper Authorship

Tools for SE users

Search User
Reclaim SE Account
Request Account Merger
Nativise imported posts
Claim post (deleted users)
Import SE post

Users whose questions have been imported from Physics Stack Exchange, Theoretical Physics Stack Exchange, or any other Stack Exchange site are kindly requested to reclaim their account and not to register as a new user.

Public \(\beta\) tools

Report a bug with a feature
Request a new functionality
404 page design
Send feedback


(propose a free ad)

Site Statistics

205 submissions , 163 unreviewed
5,047 questions , 2,200 unanswered
5,345 answers , 22,709 comments
1,470 users with positive rep
816 active unimported users
More ...

  General Relativity research and QFT in curved spacetime

+ 3 like - 0 dislike

A naive question:

Are these subjects, i.e. classical GR and QFT in curved spacetime, being worked upon much anymore?

Who is researching this and what are the problems within these fields? Any sources are greatly appreciated.

This post has been migrated from (A51.SE)
asked Dec 26, 2011 in Theoretical Physics by Mr. Grinch (30 points) [ no revision ]
The cosmic censorship hypothesis is an open problem in GR

This post has been migrated from (A51.SE)

6 Answers

+ 8 like - 0 dislike

There are tons of research going on in the classical general relativity. One particularly active subarea is the so-called "numerical relativity", in which the evolution of the spacetime is simulated in computers.

Another smaller subarea, which I mention here because I'm personally interested in it, is the "fluid-gravity correspondence" which is the study of the hydrodynamic behavior of the spacetime close to the black holes. For example, the Navier-Stokes equation arises naturally as a certain limit of the Einstein equation.

This post has been migrated from (A51.SE)
answered Dec 29, 2011 by Yuji (1,395 points) [ no revision ]
The second topic sounds interesting to me, do you have any easy hearted reviews? Also do you, by any means, know a purely coordinate independent formulation of the navier stokes equations?

This post has been migrated from (A51.SE)
The standard review is http://arxiv.org/abs/gr-qc/0505065

This post has been migrated from (A51.SE)
@Kyle: That's also an interesting subject, but I meant this type of things: http://arxiv.org/abs/0905.4352

This post has been migrated from (A51.SE)
+ 7 like - 0 dislike

From a very biased point of view of a mathematician, there are lots of open problems in classical general relativity. I enumerated some at this post at Math.Stackexchange. Note that some of those are considered "solved" by (members of) the physics community (the "No-hair theorem", for example, on the uniqueness of Kerr-Newman black holes); but mathematicians sometimes like to poke holes in arguments.

This post has been migrated from (A51.SE)
answered Jan 6, 2012 by Willie Wong (580 points) [ no revision ]
+ 6 like - 0 dislike

A few topics comes to mind on QFT on curved spacetime are:

  1. Quantum inequality, which addresses bounds on quantum violation of energy conditions. Just type in Larry Ford, Tom Roman or Chris Fewster for recent development.

  2. DeSitter instabilities, which addresses whether DeSitter invariant vacua exist for interacting field theory. Perhaps a good starting point is a following paper by Polyakov.


and a paper by Higuchi, Marolf and Morrison.


  1. A rigorous existence of interacting field theory. I think a paper by Hollands is a good reference.


This post has been migrated from (A51.SE)
answered Dec 27, 2011 by Demian Cho (285 points) [ no revision ]
+ 6 like - 0 dislike

For the state of the art of research in general relativity, have a look at this site:

For research of QFT in curved spacetime there are actually two quite different approaches, Lagrangian QFT and axiomatic QFT. I don't know much about the former, I only skimmed this recently published texbook:

  • Leonard Parker, David Toms: "Quantum Field Theory in Curved Spacetime: Quantized Fields and Gravity", (Cambridge Monographs on Mathematical Physics)

So at least two people are still active in that area :-)

People in axiomatic QFT have been busy to generalize the Haag-Kastler axioms to curved spacetimes. There are several concepts that obviously have to be generalized, like the spectral condition that uses the Poincare group. This has been accomplished several years ago and now people are generalizing theorems and concepts.

A good place to start is this textbook:

  • Wald, Robert M.: "Quantum field theory in curved spacetime and black hole thermodynamics". Univ. of Chicago Press 1994.

which includes a derivation of Hawking radiation and the Unruh effect.

Recently published review papers are:

  • Romeo Brunetti, Klaus Fredenhagen: "Quantum Field Theory on Curved Backgrounds", arXiv

  • Robert M. Wald: "The Formulation of Quantum Field Theory in Curved Spacetime", arXiv

  • Robert M. Wald: "The History and Present Status of Quantum Field Theory in Curved Spacetime", arXiv

This post has been migrated from (A51.SE)
answered Jan 4, 2012 by Tim van Beek (745 points) [ no revision ]
+ 3 like - 0 dislike

There are several interesting approaches to dark matter in classical gravity. For explaining rotation curves in spiral galaxies without appealing to dark matter check out Cooperstock


and subsequent papers (which I am less familiar with).

Also, there is an interesting idea generically called "exotic smoothness", which (among other things) might reproduce lensing experiments that imply the existence of dark matter. A good introduction by Carl Brans can be found here:


He also coauthored a textbook on the subject with Torsten Asselmeyer-Maluga, Exotic Smoothness and Physics: Differential Topology and Spacetime Models published by World Scientific.

This post has been migrated from (A51.SE)
answered Dec 29, 2011 by cduston (160 points) [ no revision ]
+ 1 like - 0 dislike

One field which uses part of the formalism is relativistic quantum information. You might want to check out http://www.isrqi.org/

Some of the problems being researched are: 1. Quantum information on curved backgrounds arXiv 1108.3896

  1. Vacuum entanglement arXiv 1105.1192

  2. Closed time like curves arXiv 1003.1987

  3. Entanglement and quantum information for accelerating observes quant-ph/0410172

There is a 2003 review on the subject but it does not include too much about QFT on a curved ST.


This post has been migrated from (A51.SE)
answered Jan 1, 2012 by user122 (10 points) [ no revision ]

Your answer

Please use answers only to (at least partly) answer questions. To comment, discuss, or ask for clarification, leave a comment instead.
To mask links under text, please type your text, highlight it, and click the "link" button. You can then enter your link URL.
Please consult the FAQ for as to how to format your post.
This is the answer box; if you want to write a comment instead, please use the 'add comment' button.
Live preview (may slow down editor)   Preview
Your name to display (optional):
Privacy: Your email address will only be used for sending these notifications.
Anti-spam verification:
If you are a human please identify the position of the character covered by the symbol $\varnothing$ in the following word:
Then drag the red bullet below over the corresponding character of our banner. When you drop it there, the bullet changes to green (on slow internet connections after a few seconds).
Please complete the anti-spam verification

user contributions licensed under cc by-sa 3.0 with attribution required

Your rights