• Register
PhysicsOverflow is a next-generation academic platform for physicists and astronomers, including a community peer review system and a postgraduate-level discussion forum analogous to MathOverflow.

Welcome to PhysicsOverflow! PhysicsOverflow is an open platform for community peer review and graduate-level Physics discussion.

Please help promote PhysicsOverflow ads elsewhere if you like it.


PO is now at the Physics Department of Bielefeld University!

New printer friendly PO pages!

Migration to Bielefeld University was successful!

Please vote for this year's PhysicsOverflow ads!

Please do help out in categorising submissions. Submit a paper to PhysicsOverflow!

... see more

Tools for paper authors

Submit paper
Claim Paper Authorship

Tools for SE users

Search User
Reclaim SE Account
Request Account Merger
Nativise imported posts
Claim post (deleted users)
Import SE post

Users whose questions have been imported from Physics Stack Exchange, Theoretical Physics Stack Exchange, or any other Stack Exchange site are kindly requested to reclaim their account and not to register as a new user.

Public \(\beta\) tools

Report a bug with a feature
Request a new functionality
404 page design
Send feedback


(propose a free ad)

Site Statistics

205 submissions , 163 unreviewed
5,079 questions , 2,229 unanswered
5,348 answers , 22,758 comments
1,470 users with positive rep
819 active unimported users
More ...

  Simplifying the URL structure

+ 1 like - 0 dislike

Earlier, on the blog, it was mentioned that we are not completely free to choose the URL structure, because some plug-ins require a specific URL structure. 

However, I just tested changing the URL structure to  /123/why-do-birds-not-sing (the simplest one), and it seemed to work. I tested every single of the plugins in every possible way, and it worked always. 

Why, then, are we using the most complicated,  quite-difficult-to-memorise URL structure /index.php?qa=123&qa_1=why-do-birds-not-sing ?   

asked Mar 7, 2014 in Feature Request by dimension10 (1,985 points) [ no revision ]
retagged Mar 18, 2014 by dimension10

1 Answer

+ 2 like - 0 dislike

Hm, I realise that there is one problem indeed with the simplest URL structure. 

The problem is that relative links would not work. This includes, for example, the links in the sidebar. The simplest URL structure which allows relative links is /?qa=123/why-do-birds-sing. Maybe just after we go public, we should change all the relative links to absolute (just without the "trollsouthere14"), and then we can make the URL structure /123/why-do-birds-sing, remember this helps our SEO, at least according to the admin panel instructions.           

answered Mar 9, 2014 by dimension10 (1,985 points) [ no revision ]

This has been fixed by polarkernel, : ) .             

Your answer

Please use answers only to (at least partly) answer questions. To comment, discuss, or ask for clarification, leave a comment instead.
To mask links under text, please type your text, highlight it, and click the "link" button. You can then enter your link URL.
Please consult the FAQ for as to how to format your post.
This is the answer box; if you want to write a comment instead, please use the 'add comment' button.
Live preview (may slow down editor)   Preview
Your name to display (optional):
Privacy: Your email address will only be used for sending these notifications.
Anti-spam verification:
If you are a human please identify the position of the character covered by the symbol $\varnothing$ in the following word:
Then drag the red bullet below over the corresponding character of our banner. When you drop it there, the bullet changes to green (on slow internet connections after a few seconds).
Please complete the anti-spam verification

user contributions licensed under cc by-sa 3.0 with attribution required

Your rights