• Register
PhysicsOverflow is a next-generation academic platform for physicists and astronomers, including a community peer review system and a postgraduate-level discussion forum analogous to MathOverflow.

Welcome to PhysicsOverflow! PhysicsOverflow is an open platform for community peer review and graduate-level Physics discussion.

Please help promote PhysicsOverflow ads elsewhere if you like it.


Migration to Bielefeld University was successful!

Please vote for this year's PhysicsOverflow ads!

Please do help out in categorising submissions. Submit a paper to PhysicsOverflow!

... see more

Tools for paper authors

Submit paper
Claim Paper Authorship

Tools for SE users

Search User
Reclaim SE Account
Request Account Merger
Nativise imported posts
Claim post (deleted users)
Import SE post

Users whose questions have been imported from Physics Stack Exchange, Theoretical Physics Stack Exchange, or any other Stack Exchange site are kindly requested to reclaim their account and not to register as a new user.

Public \(\beta\) tools

Report a bug with a feature
Request a new functionality
404 page design
Send feedback


(propose a free ad)

Site Statistics

135 submissions , 113 unreviewed
3,828 questions , 1,353 unanswered
4,758 answers , 20,140 comments
1,470 users with positive rep
481 active unimported users
More ...

Technical naturalness of Yukawa couplings

+ 9 like - 0 dislike

Naturalness in the sense of 't Hooft tell us that a small parameter is a signal of a symmetry such that the parameter will be zero when the symmetry is exact. I am puzzled about how this principle is applied now that the yukawa of the top is confirmed to be -at low energy- practically $y_t=1$, while all the other yukawas are a lot smaller.

It seems that this naturalness principle claims for a symmetry that does not protect the top quark, but protects all the other quarks and leptons. Is there such symmetry in the standard model, or in the most promising BSM extensions (Susy guts, etc)?

This post has been migrated from (A51.SE)
asked Sep 19, 2011 in Theoretical Physics by anonymous [ no revision ]
retagged Apr 19, 2014 by dimension10
Footnote: if one assumes susy, this naturalness applies to a set of 84 scalars, the partners of leptons and quarks. This is a very beloved number in 11D Sugra and M-theory, as it is the number of components of the antisymmetric tensor which is the source of the membrane. Of course, it is also a common dimension for representations of Lie group, so it could have not further meaning.

This post has been migrated from (A51.SE)
I am not familiar with 't Hooft, do you have a reference?

This post has been migrated from (A51.SE)
I think that 't Hooft formulated it in the context of chiral symmetry breaking, but as a principle it is more general.

This post has been migrated from (A51.SE)

1 Answer

+ 8 like - 0 dislike

Top's Yukawa coupling of order one is technically natural, the much smaller couplings are not natural. One may find this problem discussed under the term "hierarchy of Yukawa couplings".

The previous paragraph really says that the Standard Model doesn't have any mechanism to explain the smallness of any non-top Yukawa couplings. First, let me discuss solutions that make couplings natural one by one, or subsets are natural.

In GUT-like theories, the neutrino masses are small because they're produced by the seesaw mechanism from GUT-scale right-handed neutrino Majorana masses and electroweak-scale Dirac masses which produces tiny millielectronvolt-scale Majorana masses for the well-known left-handed neutrinos.

In supersymmetric GUT-like theories, bottom and perhaps charged tau lepton may join the top quark and their masses may be technically natural because one has two Higgs doublets and if $\tan\beta$ is of order 40 – but we know from the LHC that it's almost certainly below 15 today – then the bottom quark has an $O(1)$ Yukawa coupling to the lower-vev Higgs just like the top quark has an $O(1)$ coupling to the greater-vev Higgs. Tau mass may be joined as well.

The other masses of lighter generations are even more unnatural. In string theory, one usually shows that all the generations except for the heaviest ones are strictly massless in some approximation, so the masses are generated by some subleading effects. New U(1) symmetries and/or masses produced from world sheet instantons in intersecting brane worlds are examples where low electron mass may come from.

So this is a technical industry but one must realize that these hiearchies, while obvious, are still much less severe than the lightness of the Higgs and the cosmological constant problem. The Higgs mass is $O(10^{-15})$ in Planck units; the cosmological constant is $O(10^{-123})$ in the same units. On the other hand, the electron/top is $3\times 10^{-6}$ which is less extreme than the usual hierarchy problem (low Higgs mass).

This post has been migrated from (A51.SE)
answered Sep 23, 2011 by Luboš Motl (10,238 points) [ no revision ]

Your answer

Please use answers only to (at least partly) answer questions. To comment, discuss, or ask for clarification, leave a comment instead.
To mask links under text, please type your text, highlight it, and click the "link" button. You can then enter your link URL.
Please consult the FAQ for as to how to format your post.
This is the answer box; if you want to write a comment instead, please use the 'add comment' button.
Live preview (may slow down editor)   Preview
Your name to display (optional):
Privacy: Your email address will only be used for sending these notifications.
Anti-spam verification:
If you are a human please identify the position of the character covered by the symbol $\varnothing$ in the following word:
Then drag the red bullet below over the corresponding character of our banner. When you drop it there, the bullet changes to green (on slow internet connections after a few seconds).
To avoid this verification in future, please log in or register.

user contributions licensed under cc by-sa 3.0 with attribution required

Your rights