Quantcast
  • Register
PhysicsOverflow is a next-generation academic platform for physicists and astronomers, including a community peer review system and a postgraduate-level discussion forum analogous to MathOverflow.

Welcome to PhysicsOverflow! PhysicsOverflow is an open platform for community peer review and graduate-level Physics discussion.

Please help promote PhysicsOverflow ads elsewhere if you like it.

News

PO is now at the Physics Department of Bielefeld University!

New printer friendly PO pages!

Migration to Bielefeld University was successful!

Please vote for this year's PhysicsOverflow ads!

Please do help out in categorising submissions. Submit a paper to PhysicsOverflow!

... see more

Tools for paper authors

Submit paper
Claim Paper Authorship

Tools for SE users

Search User
Reclaim SE Account
Request Account Merger
Nativise imported posts
Claim post (deleted users)
Import SE post

Users whose questions have been imported from Physics Stack Exchange, Theoretical Physics Stack Exchange, or any other Stack Exchange site are kindly requested to reclaim their account and not to register as a new user.

Public \(\beta\) tools

Report a bug with a feature
Request a new functionality
404 page design
Send feedback

Attributions

(propose a free ad)

Site Statistics

205 submissions , 163 unreviewed
5,047 questions , 2,200 unanswered
5,345 answers , 22,709 comments
1,470 users with positive rep
816 active unimported users
More ...

  What is the physical meaning of the vacuum state in the BCS ground state?

+ 1 like - 0 dislike
390 views

the BCS ground state is:

$$|\psi_G\rangle= \prod_k(u_k+v_kc_{k,\uparrow}^+ c_{-k,\downarrow}^+)|\phi_0\rangle $$

now, i always believed that the vacuum state $|\phi_0\rangle$ was a state with no particles, whatever their nature. (i.e. no single electrons and also no Cooper pairs). the physical meaning of $|\psi_G\rangle$ so was clear: the probability amplitudes $u_k , v_k$ described the probability, for any k-value, of creating a couple of electrons or leaving the state empty. This couples of electrons ARE NOT necessarily Cooper pairs, they are Cooper pairs only when the value of k is such that the energy associated to the electron lays in a range $\hbar \omega_D$ from the fermi energy. The BCS ground state so is a mixture of Cooper condensate and not paired electrons. Now this seems in contrast with what i read here:https://doi.org/10.1119/1.5093291, quoting: "Now, let us consider a superconductor, where a new ground state $|\Omega_S\rangle$ has developed. The pair condensate can be thought of as the superconducting vacuum (since paired electrons have minimal energy), which we denote as the field $\Delta(x)$. The electrons in the superconductor may interact pairwise with the vacuum, either vanishing and creating a pair or appearing and breaking a pair, and as a result electron number is no longer conserved and states of different electron numbers may now have a nonzero overlap. In particular, $$\langle \Omega_S| \Psi_{\downarrow} \Psi_{\uparrow} |\Omega_S\rangle = \langle \Omega_S|\Omega_S -2e^- + pair\rangle \neq 0$$

The ground state may now begin with N electrons, interact with the condensate and exchange any number of pairs and electrons, and then be found in a state with M electrons.

Now this seems in contrast with my previous picture: if we take $|\Omega_S\rangle =|\psi_G\rangle$ the electron annihilation operators $\Psi_{\downarrow} \Psi_{\uparrow}$ acting on this state will annihilate a couple of electrons, but this will not imply a creation of a Cooper pair. This made me think that maybe the vacuum state $|\phi_0\rangle$ is not a state completely empty, but is the state of the Cooper condensate, i.e. the state where all the electrons form Cooper pairs. the meaning of the BCS ground state thus is that we have probabilities $u_k , v_k$ of not destroying or destroying, respectively, a Cooper pair. Now i'm wondering, what is the correct interpretation of the vacuum state?

This post imported from StackExchange Physics at 2023-06-10 21:25 (UTC), posted by SE-user Valerio Actis Dato Casale
asked Jun 6, 2023 in Theoretical Physics by Valerio Actis Dato Casale (5 points) [ no revision ]
The canonical textbook for Superconductor is Tinkham's book. I advise you to take a look at it.

This post imported from StackExchange Physics at 2023-06-10 21:25 (UTC), posted by SE-user MathematicalPhysicist
well yes, i already did, that's where i studied superconductivity in the first place. The vacuum state though is shortly referred to as "state with no particles" and it's not clear whether by particles it's meant electrons or also Cooper pairs

This post imported from StackExchange Physics at 2023-06-10 21:25 (UTC), posted by SE-user Valerio Actis Dato Casale
Are Cooper pairs particles or pseudo particles? en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Instanton

This post imported from StackExchange Physics at 2023-06-10 21:25 (UTC), posted by SE-user MathematicalPhysicist
i'd say they are pseudo-particles. So you are suggesting that the vacuum state is indeed filled with Cooper pairs?

This post imported from StackExchange Physics at 2023-06-10 21:25 (UTC), posted by SE-user Valerio Actis Dato Casale
maybe my question can be re-stated in this simple way: the creation and annihilation operators $c^{\dagger}_{k,\uparrow}$ and $c_{-k,\downarrow}$ only create electrons? (more precisely fermionic quasi-particles). So they do not create or destroy Cooper pairs (that are a different thing from a fermionic quasiparticle), when they act in couples with opposite k and spins?

This post imported from StackExchange Physics at 2023-06-10 21:25 (UTC), posted by SE-user Valerio Actis Dato Casale

Your answer

Please use answers only to (at least partly) answer questions. To comment, discuss, or ask for clarification, leave a comment instead.
To mask links under text, please type your text, highlight it, and click the "link" button. You can then enter your link URL.
Please consult the FAQ for as to how to format your post.
This is the answer box; if you want to write a comment instead, please use the 'add comment' button.
Live preview (may slow down editor)   Preview
Your name to display (optional):
Privacy: Your email address will only be used for sending these notifications.
Anti-spam verification:
If you are a human please identify the position of the character covered by the symbol $\varnothing$ in the following word:
p$\hbar$ysi$\varnothing$sOverflow
Then drag the red bullet below over the corresponding character of our banner. When you drop it there, the bullet changes to green (on slow internet connections after a few seconds).
Please complete the anti-spam verification




user contributions licensed under cc by-sa 3.0 with attribution required

Your rights
...