• Register
PhysicsOverflow is a next-generation academic platform for physicists and astronomers, including a community peer review system and a postgraduate-level discussion forum analogous to MathOverflow.

Welcome to PhysicsOverflow! PhysicsOverflow is an open platform for community peer review and graduate-level Physics discussion.

Please help promote PhysicsOverflow ads elsewhere if you like it.


PO is now at the Physics Department of Bielefeld University!

New printer friendly PO pages!

Migration to Bielefeld University was successful!

Please vote for this year's PhysicsOverflow ads!

Please do help out in categorising submissions. Submit a paper to PhysicsOverflow!

... see more

Tools for paper authors

Submit paper
Claim Paper Authorship

Tools for SE users

Search User
Reclaim SE Account
Request Account Merger
Nativise imported posts
Claim post (deleted users)
Import SE post

Users whose questions have been imported from Physics Stack Exchange, Theoretical Physics Stack Exchange, or any other Stack Exchange site are kindly requested to reclaim their account and not to register as a new user.

Public \(\beta\) tools

Report a bug with a feature
Request a new functionality
404 page design
Send feedback


(propose a free ad)

Site Statistics

205 submissions , 163 unreviewed
5,054 questions , 2,207 unanswered
5,347 answers , 22,720 comments
1,470 users with positive rep
818 active unimported users
More ...

  Can Feynman-Stueckelberg explain cosmological constant problem?

+ 0 like - 0 dislike

According to the uncertainty principle each Planck sized region of space has a Planck scale amount of momentum associated with it. The energy in that momentum can be converted to particle-antiparticle pairs. According to the standard interpretation each pair has equal and opposite charges so that it can be argued that the charge density of space is zero. According to the Feynman-Stueckelberg interpretation these pairs can also be considered to have equal and opposite masses so that the mass density of space is zero. Would this explain why the Universe does not exponentially increase in size due to zero-point energy?

asked Sep 2, 2022 in Theoretical Physics by John [ revision history ]
edited Sep 2, 2022

Any distance is meaningless by itself; it must be a distance, say, between two particles with the de Broglie lengths much shorter than this distance. Thus, fot two particles with so short de Broglie lengths (hight momentum-enrgie of collision) many other particles may be created. Vacuum itself does not produce anything since it is the ground state with a certain enery equal to zero.

Your answer

Please use answers only to (at least partly) answer questions. To comment, discuss, or ask for clarification, leave a comment instead.
To mask links under text, please type your text, highlight it, and click the "link" button. You can then enter your link URL.
Please consult the FAQ for as to how to format your post.
This is the answer box; if you want to write a comment instead, please use the 'add comment' button.
Live preview (may slow down editor)   Preview
Your name to display (optional):
Privacy: Your email address will only be used for sending these notifications.
Anti-spam verification:
If you are a human please identify the position of the character covered by the symbol $\varnothing$ in the following word:
Then drag the red bullet below over the corresponding character of our banner. When you drop it there, the bullet changes to green (on slow internet connections after a few seconds).
Please complete the anti-spam verification

user contributions licensed under cc by-sa 3.0 with attribution required

Your rights