• Register
PhysicsOverflow is a next-generation academic platform for physicists and astronomers, including a community peer review system and a postgraduate-level discussion forum analogous to MathOverflow.

Welcome to PhysicsOverflow! PhysicsOverflow is an open platform for community peer review and graduate-level Physics discussion.

Please help promote PhysicsOverflow ads elsewhere if you like it.


PO is now at the Physics Department of Bielefeld University!

New printer friendly PO pages!

Migration to Bielefeld University was successful!

Please vote for this year's PhysicsOverflow ads!

Please do help out in categorising submissions. Submit a paper to PhysicsOverflow!

... see more

Tools for paper authors

Submit paper
Claim Paper Authorship

Tools for SE users

Search User
Reclaim SE Account
Request Account Merger
Nativise imported posts
Claim post (deleted users)
Import SE post

Users whose questions have been imported from Physics Stack Exchange, Theoretical Physics Stack Exchange, or any other Stack Exchange site are kindly requested to reclaim their account and not to register as a new user.

Public \(\beta\) tools

Report a bug with a feature
Request a new functionality
404 page design
Send feedback


(propose a free ad)

Site Statistics

205 submissions , 163 unreviewed
5,047 questions , 2,200 unanswered
5,345 answers , 22,709 comments
1,470 users with positive rep
816 active unimported users
More ...

  Is it possible to attempt a classical (mathematical) model for a basic particle like electron from the requirements of QM and SR? What are the limitations?

+ 0 like - 0 dislike

The following two articles published in the Journal- AIP Advances (March 2011) suggest a classical mathematical model for a basic particle electron, by studying the requirements of Quantum Mechanics and Special Relativity. The model is then expected to give same results in a mathematical analysis as obtained by experiments and suggested by these theories. They are available in the Review Section:

1. Mathematical Model I. Electron and quantum mechanics


2. Mathematical model II. Basic particle and special relativity


The main LIMITATIONS of the approach are:

a).  We need a complete and well defined system to generate any classical model of a physical reality.

b).  The model of a basic particle can be relative to another particle, with which it interacts. Say, electron as seen by proton, in a Hydrogen atom. The human observer’s role is limited to observing the effects of interaction within these two particles, such as emission of a photon, using his measuring instruments. The concept of describing a classical model of the basic particle as seen by the human observer needs to be discarded.

asked Aug 18, 2022 in Q&A by anonymous [ no revision ]

"Any classical model" is incompatible with QM postulates/facts (probabilities, interference of probability amplitudes). A classical model is an inclusive QM model, where many different points are averaged into one, "classical". Such a replacement is irreversible (the Moon as a point, for example). See, for explanations, my atomic paper in arXive "Atom as a Dressed Nucleus" and the following papers.

Your answer

Please use answers only to (at least partly) answer questions. To comment, discuss, or ask for clarification, leave a comment instead.
To mask links under text, please type your text, highlight it, and click the "link" button. You can then enter your link URL.
Please consult the FAQ for as to how to format your post.
This is the answer box; if you want to write a comment instead, please use the 'add comment' button.
Live preview (may slow down editor)   Preview
Your name to display (optional):
Privacy: Your email address will only be used for sending these notifications.
Anti-spam verification:
If you are a human please identify the position of the character covered by the symbol $\varnothing$ in the following word:
Then drag the red bullet below over the corresponding character of our banner. When you drop it there, the bullet changes to green (on slow internet connections after a few seconds).
Please complete the anti-spam verification

user contributions licensed under cc by-sa 3.0 with attribution required

Your rights