Quantcast
  • Register
PhysicsOverflow is a next-generation academic platform for physicists and astronomers, including a community peer review system and a postgraduate-level discussion forum analogous to MathOverflow.

Welcome to PhysicsOverflow! PhysicsOverflow is an open platform for community peer review and graduate-level Physics discussion.

Please help promote PhysicsOverflow ads elsewhere if you like it.

News

New printer friendly PO pages!

Migration to Bielefeld University was successful!

Please vote for this year's PhysicsOverflow ads!

Please do help out in categorising submissions. Submit a paper to PhysicsOverflow!

... see more

Tools for paper authors

Submit paper
Claim Paper Authorship

Tools for SE users

Search User
Reclaim SE Account
Request Account Merger
Nativise imported posts
Claim post (deleted users)
Import SE post

Users whose questions have been imported from Physics Stack Exchange, Theoretical Physics Stack Exchange, or any other Stack Exchange site are kindly requested to reclaim their account and not to register as a new user.

Public \(\beta\) tools

Report a bug with a feature
Request a new functionality
404 page design
Send feedback

Attributions

(propose a free ad)

Site Statistics

198 submissions , 156 unreviewed
4,910 questions , 2,085 unanswered
5,318 answers , 22,540 comments
1,470 users with positive rep
808 active unimported users
More ...

  Is the black brane picture at strong string coupling?

+ 2 like - 0 dislike
60 views

As far as I am aware there are two pictures of branes:

  • for $g_SN\gg1$: branes as solitonic solutions to the field equations of supergravity (i.e. black branes)
  • for $g_SN\ll1$: branes as fundamental objects, on which we can build $\sigma$-models (e.g. the fundamental string).

where $g_S$ is the string coupling and $N$ is the units of flux or number of branes in a stack.

My understanding is that these two are seen as complementary pictures of the same objects, e.g. a condensate of fundamental $p$-branes turns into a black brane. However, I am not sure whether the black brane picture is valid at strong string coupling too. Some seemingly incompatible excerpts from the literature:

  • In Maldacena's 1997 paper, it is mentioned that the black brane limit $g_SN\gg1$ is understood to be at small $g_S$. Indeed, in the classical review hep-th/9905111, the limit is written as $N>g_SN\gg1$ to emphasise this.
  • From Clifford Johnson's D-brane primer: $g_SN\gg1$ "corresponds to either having $N$ small and $g_S$ large, or vice versa".

So I am not sure what to believe: are black branes (as solutions to supergravity) at small $g_S$, or at large $g_SN$ with $g_S$ free to take any value (as long as $g_SN\gg1$)? I see reasons for both:

  • Since we are talking about (10-d) supergravity solutions, we ought to be at small $g_S$ (in addition to small $\alpha'$), since SUGRA is the low-energy limit of string theory (which is perturbative in $g_S$). However, I guess as we increase $g_S$ we would simply go to 11-d SUGRA, so perhaps $g_S$ need not be small?
  • In the black brane picture, the branes backreact so much that they create the geometry. This makes sense if $g_S$ is large. Also, the large $g_S$ argument seems to me to be at the heart of entropy calculations of black holes.

Or is the whole point that (some) branes are BPS objects? And so even if originally the SUGRA solutions were at small $g_S$ (since it is SUGRA we're talking about), they are protected objects and we may follow them at strong coupling too, and so effectively the black brane picture is valid at any $g_S$?

Many thanks.

asked May 24 in Theoretical Physics by dingy [ revision history ]
edited May 24

Your answer

Please use answers only to (at least partly) answer questions. To comment, discuss, or ask for clarification, leave a comment instead.
To mask links under text, please type your text, highlight it, and click the "link" button. You can then enter your link URL.
Please consult the FAQ for as to how to format your post.
This is the answer box; if you want to write a comment instead, please use the 'add comment' button.
Live preview (may slow down editor)   Preview
Your name to display (optional):
Privacy: Your email address will only be used for sending these notifications.
Anti-spam verification:
If you are a human please identify the position of the character covered by the symbol $\varnothing$ in the following word:
p$\hbar$ysicsO$\varnothing$erflow
Then drag the red bullet below over the corresponding character of our banner. When you drop it there, the bullet changes to green (on slow internet connections after a few seconds).
To avoid this verification in future, please log in or register.




user contributions licensed under cc by-sa 3.0 with attribution required

Your rights
...