# $B$-$L$ global symmetry in the grand unification theories

+ 2 like - 0 dislike
2505 views

Does the precise $$B$$-$$L$$ global symmetry present in:

This post imported from StackExchange Physics at 2020-11-28 23:03 (UTC), posted by SE-user annie marie heart

+ 7 like - 0 dislike

In the standard model lagrangian, B and L are separately conserved global charges, and B-L, a vector like symmetry, is anomaly-free. GUTs, like the G-G SU(5) violate B and L, but preserve B-L.

Wikipedia effectively defines the SU(5)-model U(1) symmetry X as $$X = 5(B − L) -2Y_W,$$ introduced by Wilczek & Zee in 1979. It is not a generator of SU(5), of course.

So you may readily compute for the left-chiral $$\bar {\bf{5}}$$, $$\overline{ d_R} : ~~(2Q=)~~~ Y=2/3 , ~~~~ B-L= -1/3 ~~~ \leadsto X=-3 \\ e^-_L, \nu_L : ~~~~~~~ Y= -1 , ~~~~~~ B-L= -1 \qquad \leadsto X=-3.$$ So the entire multiplet possesses a common X-charge: -3.

Proceed to verify for the left-chiral 10, X= 1. $$\overline{ u_R} : ~~(2Q=)~~~~~ Y=-4/3 , ~~~~ B-L= -1/3 ~~~\leadsto X=1 \\ d_L,u_L : ~~~~~~~~~ Y=1/3 , ~~~~ B-L= 1/3 \qquad \leadsto X=1 \\ e^+_L : ~~(2Q=)~~~~~ Y= 2 , ~~~~~~~ B-L= 1 \qquad \leadsto X=1.$$

Thence, for the $$\langle \phi ^* \rangle$$, X=2, so the Yukawa (mass) term is chargeless.

Note that B-L is vectorlike, but Y is not, so, ipso facto, X is not!

Similarly for SO(10), except here X is now a generator of SO(10) and is then gauged (hence SSBroken), hence violated by small amounts.

Responses to comment questions.

1) B-L is a good global symmetry for the SM and SU(5) and local for SO(10). So, e.g., in SU(5) proton decay to a pion and a positron, it is visibly preserved!

2) X is fine in the SM and SU(5) as a global symmetry, as a linear combination of good quantum numbers. As defined, it has a unique eigenvalue for each SU(5) rep, not necessarily the same for all reps, as you observe. Same for the SM which has smaller reps, several of which entered into each SU(5) rep. That means that, even for SU(5) which mixes baryons and leptons, it is straightforward to match X eigenvalues and monitor the symmetry of the coupling terms, like the Yukawas.

3) SO(10) largely follows suit, paralleling SU(5), and likewise lacks exotic particles, but gauges X, so SSBreaks it. But now the above two reps of SU(5) plus an extra singlet (the R-chiral neutrino) fit into a spinor 16 of SO(10). If your wrote down the multiplet, it might be easier to parse out. This review, eqn. (3.3), has X as a traceless diagonal generator, so you can check its eigenvalue on the fermion 16-plet (4.2).

Now, in most models, even though X is SSBroken and its corresponding gauge boson made massive, this happens at a high scale and results in a GUT with SU(5)-like symmetry, with effective B-L violating operators of dimension 6, i.e. suppressed by the square of such heavy scales, so very small. Thus, in such models, for all intents and purposes, proton decay is still approximately respectful of B-L!

This post imported from StackExchange Physics at 2020-11-28 23:03 (UTC), posted by SE-user Cosmas Zachos
answered Apr 15, 2020 by (370 points)
Slansky Table 14, the starting point of any and all such questions, as your instructor in your GUT course must have emphasized to you.

This post imported from StackExchange Physics at 2020-11-28 23:03 (UTC), posted by SE-user Cosmas Zachos
but those Table seem to include only Lie algebra, I am not sure they have Lie group consideration included. Thank you a good ref I just learned from you!

This post imported from StackExchange Physics at 2020-11-28 23:03 (UTC), posted by SE-user annie marie heart
btw I have one more basic puzzle learning GUT: physics.stackexchange.com/questions/560676

This post imported from StackExchange Physics at 2020-11-28 23:03 (UTC), posted by SE-user annie marie heart
maybe you also know already physics.stackexchange.com/questions/564976

This post imported from StackExchange Physics at 2020-11-28 23:03 (UTC), posted by SE-user annie marie heart
Don't know much about its advantages. Gives you longer life for the proton...

This post imported from StackExchange Physics at 2020-11-28 23:03 (UTC), posted by SE-user Cosmas Zachos
 Please use answers only to (at least partly) answer questions. To comment, discuss, or ask for clarification, leave a comment instead. To mask links under text, please type your text, highlight it, and click the "link" button. You can then enter your link URL. Please consult the FAQ for as to how to format your post. This is the answer box; if you want to write a comment instead, please use the 'add comment' button. Live preview (may slow down editor)   Preview Your name to display (optional): Email me at this address if my answer is selected or commented on: Privacy: Your email address will only be used for sending these notifications. Anti-spam verification: If you are a human please identify the position of the character covered by the symbol $\varnothing$ in the following word:p$\hbar$ysicsO$\varnothing$erflowThen drag the red bullet below over the corresponding character of our banner. When you drop it there, the bullet changes to green (on slow internet connections after a few seconds). Please complete the anti-spam verification