• Register
PhysicsOverflow is a next-generation academic platform for physicists and astronomers, including a community peer review system and a postgraduate-level discussion forum analogous to MathOverflow.

Welcome to PhysicsOverflow! PhysicsOverflow is an open platform for community peer review and graduate-level Physics discussion.

Please help promote PhysicsOverflow ads elsewhere if you like it.


PO is now at the Physics Department of Bielefeld University!

New printer friendly PO pages!

Migration to Bielefeld University was successful!

Please vote for this year's PhysicsOverflow ads!

Please do help out in categorising submissions. Submit a paper to PhysicsOverflow!

... see more

Tools for paper authors

Submit paper
Claim Paper Authorship

Tools for SE users

Search User
Reclaim SE Account
Request Account Merger
Nativise imported posts
Claim post (deleted users)
Import SE post

Users whose questions have been imported from Physics Stack Exchange, Theoretical Physics Stack Exchange, or any other Stack Exchange site are kindly requested to reclaim their account and not to register as a new user.

Public \(\beta\) tools

Report a bug with a feature
Request a new functionality
404 page design
Send feedback


(propose a free ad)

Site Statistics

205 submissions , 163 unreviewed
5,064 questions , 2,215 unanswered
5,347 answers , 22,734 comments
1,470 users with positive rep
818 active unimported users
More ...

  quark momentum and quark mass in unpairing and pairing phase

+ 0 like - 0 dislike

In this Review paper in p.1464, top left: Rev.Mod.Phys.80:1455-1515,2008 -- Color superconductivity in dense quark matter

It shows a figure of quark momentum of quark $u,d,s$, in unpairing and pairing phase, such that

$$p_d >p_u>p_s$$

however, we know: $$ m_u<m_d<m_s$$

so why isnt that $$p_u >p_d>p_s$$ if momentum is inverse proportional to the quark mass? What is going on here for these quark momentum?

enter image description here

This post imported from StackExchange Physics at 2020-11-05 13:26 (UTC), posted by SE-user annie marie heart
asked Dec 25, 2017 in Theoretical Physics by annie marie heart (1,205 points) [ no revision ]

1 Answer

+ 1 like - 0 dislike

We usually consider electrically neutral matter (because charged matter cannot exist in a macroscopic system -- the Coulomb energy diverges with the volume). In principle $uds$ matter with a deficit of strange quarks (because of the heavier strange quark) can be neutralized by electrons, but it is energetically favorable to neutralize by an excess of $d$ quarks (also negatively charged). The reason is that reference state, neutral matter with equal Fermi momenta for $u,d,s$ quarks, has a large Fermi momentum for down quarks, but zero Fermi momentum for electrons. A small shift in the chemical potentials then leads to a large shift of the down quark abundance, but only a small shift in the electron abundance.

This post imported from StackExchange Physics at 2020-11-05 13:26 (UTC), posted by SE-user Thomas
answered Dec 25, 2017 by tmchaefer (310 points) [ no revision ]

Your answer

Please use answers only to (at least partly) answer questions. To comment, discuss, or ask for clarification, leave a comment instead.
To mask links under text, please type your text, highlight it, and click the "link" button. You can then enter your link URL.
Please consult the FAQ for as to how to format your post.
This is the answer box; if you want to write a comment instead, please use the 'add comment' button.
Live preview (may slow down editor)   Preview
Your name to display (optional):
Privacy: Your email address will only be used for sending these notifications.
Anti-spam verification:
If you are a human please identify the position of the character covered by the symbol $\varnothing$ in the following word:
Then drag the red bullet below over the corresponding character of our banner. When you drop it there, the bullet changes to green (on slow internet connections after a few seconds).
Please complete the anti-spam verification

user contributions licensed under cc by-sa 3.0 with attribution required

Your rights