# How to understand $T^2=(-1)^{N_f}$ in terms of operator matrices on Hilbert space

+ 1 like - 0 dislike
499 views

For a time reversal symmetry operator $\hat{T}$, we have $$\hat{T}^2=(-1)^{N_f}$$ for a fermionic (electronic) system. How do we understand $\hat{T}^2=(-1)^{N_f}$ in terms of operator matrices on the Hilbert space? $N_f$ is the number of fermions in the system.

How could we write down the expression of $\hat{T}$ in the complex fermion or Majorana fermion basese?

Naively, we have $$\hat{T}= i \sigma_y K$$ for acting on a single 2-component spin-(1/2) system, but how can the complex conjugation $K$ be realized in terms of $2 \times 2$ matrix (since a spin-(1/2) object takes a 2-dimensional Hilbert space)? Or do we need to enlarge the Hilbert space to $4 \times 4$ matrix in order to realize the complex conjugation $K$?

For a many-body electron system, how do we write down $\hat{T}$ and $\hat{T}^2=(-1)^{N_f}$ in terms of operator matrices on the $N$-dimensional Hilbert space?

This post imported from StackExchange Physics at 2020-10-30 22:41 (UTC), posted by SE-user annie marie heart
You can’t write $K$ as a matrix because it’s not a linear operator; the one-dimensional analogue of this is asking for a complex number $w$ so that $wz = \bar{z}$, which is impossible.

This post imported from StackExchange Physics at 2020-10-30 22:41 (UTC), posted by SE-user knzhou

+ 2 like - 0 dislike

This does not exactly answer your question but I think you want to justify $T^2=(-1)^N$

You best understand it by the action of Time-reversal operators on second quantized fermionic field operators. They act like

\begin{align} \mathcal{T}\Psi_{\alpha}(\mathbf{k})\mathcal{T}^{-1} & =\sum_{\alpha'}(U^{\dagger}_{\operatorname{T}})_{\alpha,\alpha'}\Psi_{\alpha'}(-\mathbf{k}),\label{eq:-29}\\ \mathcal{T}\Psi_{\alpha}^{\dagger}(\mathbf{k})\mathcal{T}^{-1} & =\sum_{\alpha'}\Psi^{\dagger}_{\alpha'}(-\mathbf{k})(U_{\operatorname{T}})_{\alpha',\alpha},\label{eq: timereversal} \end{align}

where $\alpha$ is some degree of freedom and $U_T$ is a unitary matrix. For example if I have a many-body state with $N$ electrons it can be given by $$|N\rangle=\prod_{i}^{N}\Psi^{\dagger}_{\alpha}(k_i)|\mathrm{vac}\rangle,$$ Now it is clear that $$\mathcal{T}^2|N\rangle=(U_T^2)^N|N\rangle,$$ finally if your system consists of pin one half particles $U_T$ squares to minus one.

This post imported from StackExchange Physics at 2020-10-30 22:41 (UTC), posted by SE-user physshyp
answered Oct 26, 2017 by (20 points)

 Please use answers only to (at least partly) answer questions. To comment, discuss, or ask for clarification, leave a comment instead. To mask links under text, please type your text, highlight it, and click the "link" button. You can then enter your link URL. Please consult the FAQ for as to how to format your post. This is the answer box; if you want to write a comment instead, please use the 'add comment' button. Live preview (may slow down editor)   Preview Your name to display (optional): Email me at this address if my answer is selected or commented on: Privacy: Your email address will only be used for sending these notifications. Anti-spam verification: If you are a human please identify the position of the character covered by the symbol $\varnothing$ in the following word:p$\hbar$ysicsOv$\varnothing$rflowThen drag the red bullet below over the corresponding character of our banner. When you drop it there, the bullet changes to green (on slow internet connections after a few seconds). Please complete the anti-spam verification