Quantcast
  • Register
PhysicsOverflow is a next-generation academic platform for physicists and astronomers, including a community peer review system and a postgraduate-level discussion forum analogous to MathOverflow.

Welcome to PhysicsOverflow! PhysicsOverflow is an open platform for community peer review and graduate-level Physics discussion.

Please help promote PhysicsOverflow ads elsewhere if you like it.

News

New printer friendly PO pages!

Migration to Bielefeld University was successful!

Please vote for this year's PhysicsOverflow ads!

Please do help out in categorising submissions. Submit a paper to PhysicsOverflow!

... see more

Tools for paper authors

Submit paper
Claim Paper Authorship

Tools for SE users

Search User
Reclaim SE Account
Request Account Merger
Nativise imported posts
Claim post (deleted users)
Import SE post

Users whose questions have been imported from Physics Stack Exchange, Theoretical Physics Stack Exchange, or any other Stack Exchange site are kindly requested to reclaim their account and not to register as a new user.

Public \(\beta\) tools

Report a bug with a feature
Request a new functionality
404 page design
Send feedback

Attributions

(propose a free ad)

Site Statistics

180 submissions , 140 unreviewed
4,598 questions , 1,850 unanswered
5,209 answers , 22,242 comments
1,470 users with positive rep
729 active unimported users
More ...

  The remained global flavor symmetries of massless quarks after gauging electromagnetic $U(1)$

+ 1 like - 0 dislike
19 views

For $N_f$ numebr of massless quarks, we know that there are global symmetries $$ \frac{SU(N_f)_L \times SU(N_f)_R \times U(1)_V}{Z_{N_f}} $$ here $U(1)_V$ is the same as $U(1)$-Baryon number conservation. The axial $U(1)_A$ is anomalous.

Question: What would be the remained global flavor symmetries of massless quarks after gauging electromagnetic $U(1)_e$? We can take $Nf=3$ where we have 3 quarks like $u,d,s$.

[WARNING]: Notice that $U(1)_e$ is part of the vector global flavor symmetry $SU(N_f)_V$, and gauging result in the remained $SU(N_f-1)_V$ global flavor symmetry. Namely, $U(1)_e$ is part of $SU(N_f)_L \times SU(N_f)_R$. However, we note that $$SU(N_f)_L \times SU(N_f)_R \neq SU(N_f)_V \times SU(N_f)_A$$ because the left-right chiral flavor generators DO commute, but the vector and axial generators of $SU(N_f)_V$ and $SU(N_f)_A$ do NOT commute. So the answer won't be as simple as $$ \frac{SU(N_f-1)_V \times SU(N_f)_A \times U(1)_V}{Z_{N_f}} [\text{This is WRONG!}] $$

What is your answer?

This post imported from StackExchange Physics at 2020-10-29 11:42 (UTC), posted by SE-user annie marie heart
asked Sep 12, 2017 in Theoretical Physics by annie marie heart (500 points) [ no revision ]
The axial generators do not close into an SU(2)_A, so that group is non-existent. Look at your current algebra.

This post imported from StackExchange Physics at 2020-10-29 11:42 (UTC), posted by SE-user Cosmas Zachos
Thanks, I know you cannot write $SU(n)_V \times SU(m)_A$ as a group. So I am asking how to write the global symmetry group.

This post imported from StackExchange Physics at 2020-10-29 11:42 (UTC), posted by SE-user annie marie heart
u and d have different charges, so cannot be in a single rep of $U(1)_e$.

This post imported from StackExchange Physics at 2020-10-29 11:42 (UTC), posted by SE-user Cosmas Zachos
The $U(1)$ is diagonal, but the element in $N_f=3$, you can consider a Lie algebra generator matrix proportional to $diag(2/3,-1/3,-1/3)$. It is still a $U(1)$, but not the complex $U(1)$ as $+e^{i \theta} \mathbb{I}$. I am talking about the different $U(1)$. The $SU(N)$ has no $e^{i \theta} \mathbb{I}$., only $U(N)$ has $+e^{i \theta} \mathbb{I}$ But it is already taken care carefully in my question. [What you said is not part of my question.] Thanks

This post imported from StackExchange Physics at 2020-10-29 11:42 (UTC), posted by SE-user annie marie heart
I am talking about the $U(1)_e$ diagonal for $N_f=3$, you can consider a Lie algebra generator matrix proportional to $diag(2/3,-1/3,-1/3)$.

This post imported from StackExchange Physics at 2020-10-29 11:42 (UTC), posted by SE-user annie marie heart

Your answer

Please use answers only to (at least partly) answer questions. To comment, discuss, or ask for clarification, leave a comment instead.
To mask links under text, please type your text, highlight it, and click the "link" button. You can then enter your link URL.
Please consult the FAQ for as to how to format your post.
This is the answer box; if you want to write a comment instead, please use the 'add comment' button.
Live preview (may slow down editor)   Preview
Your name to display (optional):
Privacy: Your email address will only be used for sending these notifications.
Anti-spam verification:
If you are a human please identify the position of the character covered by the symbol $\varnothing$ in the following word:
p$\hbar$ysi$\varnothing$sOverflow
Then drag the red bullet below over the corresponding character of our banner. When you drop it there, the bullet changes to green (on slow internet connections after a few seconds).
To avoid this verification in future, please log in or register.




user contributions licensed under cc by-sa 3.0 with attribution required

Your rights
...