• Register
PhysicsOverflow is a next-generation academic platform for physicists and astronomers, including a community peer review system and a postgraduate-level discussion forum analogous to MathOverflow.

Welcome to PhysicsOverflow! PhysicsOverflow is an open platform for community peer review and graduate-level Physics discussion.

Please help promote PhysicsOverflow ads elsewhere if you like it.


New printer friendly PO pages!

Migration to Bielefeld University was successful!

Please vote for this year's PhysicsOverflow ads!

Please do help out in categorising submissions. Submit a paper to PhysicsOverflow!

... see more

Tools for paper authors

Submit paper
Claim Paper Authorship

Tools for SE users

Search User
Reclaim SE Account
Request Account Merger
Nativise imported posts
Claim post (deleted users)
Import SE post

Users whose questions have been imported from Physics Stack Exchange, Theoretical Physics Stack Exchange, or any other Stack Exchange site are kindly requested to reclaim their account and not to register as a new user.

Public \(\beta\) tools

Report a bug with a feature
Request a new functionality
404 page design
Send feedback


(propose a free ad)

Site Statistics

198 submissions , 156 unreviewed
4,910 questions , 2,085 unanswered
5,318 answers , 22,540 comments
1,470 users with positive rep
807 active unimported users
More ...

  Neither left nor right particles.

+ 1 like - 0 dislike

Are there such particles? which are neither left nor right.

Perhaps a good candidate for dark matter. (I am partly joking partly serious).

asked Apr 23, 2020 in Theoretical Physics by MathematicalPhysicist (175 points) [ no revision ]

As far as they are dark particles, nobody can tell whether they are left or right or anything in between.

Assuming that by "left" and "right" you refer to chirality, how would one define the chirality of a scalar particle? Would the Higgs boson be neither "left" nor "right"?

@Flamma as I said I was half joking half serious.

I don't know how to write this mathematically.

Did you have Majorana particles in mind, or something else and more exotic?

@Dilaton how can a particle be its own antiparticle?

I mean if a particle has a charge q then its anti-particle will have a negative charge -q.

Unless of course it doesn't have charge, but I once in Physicsforums been given an answer that there's a neutron and anti-neutron both having the same zero charge, how can this be true?

Really clueless here.

Yes only neutral particles can be described as Majorana spinors.
The Majorana $4$-component description of a neutral fermion is mathematically equivalent to the description using one $2$-component Weyl spinor of definite chirality.
So I guess as for the neutron a distinguished anti-neutron can be observed, using the $2$- component Weyl spinor description both chirality states are needed, it can not be described as a Majorana particle, and its mass is a conventional dirac mass.

Your answer

Please use answers only to (at least partly) answer questions. To comment, discuss, or ask for clarification, leave a comment instead.
To mask links under text, please type your text, highlight it, and click the "link" button. You can then enter your link URL.
Please consult the FAQ for as to how to format your post.
This is the answer box; if you want to write a comment instead, please use the 'add comment' button.
Live preview (may slow down editor)   Preview
Your name to display (optional):
Privacy: Your email address will only be used for sending these notifications.
Anti-spam verification:
If you are a human please identify the position of the character covered by the symbol $\varnothing$ in the following word:
Then drag the red bullet below over the corresponding character of our banner. When you drop it there, the bullet changes to green (on slow internet connections after a few seconds).
To avoid this verification in future, please log in or register.

user contributions licensed under cc by-sa 3.0 with attribution required

Your rights