• Register
PhysicsOverflow is a next-generation academic platform for physicists and astronomers, including a community peer review system and a postgraduate-level discussion forum analogous to MathOverflow.

Welcome to PhysicsOverflow! PhysicsOverflow is an open platform for community peer review and graduate-level Physics discussion.

Please help promote PhysicsOverflow ads elsewhere if you like it.


PO is now at the Physics Department of Bielefeld University!

New printer friendly PO pages!

Migration to Bielefeld University was successful!

Please vote for this year's PhysicsOverflow ads!

Please do help out in categorising submissions. Submit a paper to PhysicsOverflow!

... see more

Tools for paper authors

Submit paper
Claim Paper Authorship

Tools for SE users

Search User
Reclaim SE Account
Request Account Merger
Nativise imported posts
Claim post (deleted users)
Import SE post

Users whose questions have been imported from Physics Stack Exchange, Theoretical Physics Stack Exchange, or any other Stack Exchange site are kindly requested to reclaim their account and not to register as a new user.

Public \(\beta\) tools

Report a bug with a feature
Request a new functionality
404 page design
Send feedback


(propose a free ad)

Site Statistics

205 submissions , 163 unreviewed
5,064 questions , 2,215 unanswered
5,347 answers , 22,741 comments
1,470 users with positive rep
818 active unimported users
More ...

  Global symmetry in string theory

+ 7 like - 0 dislike

It is often stated that in quantum gravity only charges coupled to gauge fields can be conserved. This is because of the no hair theorem. If a charge is coupled to a gauge field then when it falls into a black hole the black hole acquires a corresponding field. However if it is not then the black hole doesn't "remember" it. Apparently it implies we can't have exact global symmetries, only gauge symmetries.

How is this expectation realized in string theory? Is it true string vacuum sectors cannot posses global symmetry? Can we prove it?

This post has been migrated from (A51.SE)
asked Nov 5, 2011 in Theoretical Physics by Squark (1,725 points) [ no revision ]

1 Answer

+ 7 like - 0 dislike

We can prove it in perturbative string theory but it's probably valid beyond it.

In perturbative string theory, any (continuous) global symmetry has to be associated with a conserved charge which, because of the locality of the physics on the world sheet, implies the existence of a world sheet current $j$ or $\bar j$ or both (left movers vs right movers) whose left/right dimension is $(1,0)$ or $(0,1)$ or both (because its integral has to be a conformally invariant charge). Typically, such a symmetry might be something like the isometry of the target (spacetime) manifold or something on equal footing with it.

It follows that one may also construct operators $j\exp(ik\cdot X) \bar\partial X^\mu$ or $\bar j \exp(ik\cdot X) \partial X^\mu$ or both with a null vector $k$ which have the dimension $(1,1)$, transform as spacetime vectors, and therefore belong to the spectrum of vertex operators of physical states which moreover transform as spacetime vectors, i.e. they're the gauge bosons (the $X$ only go over the large spacetime coordinates). One would need to prove that the multiplication of the operators doesn't spoil their tensor character but it usually holds.

Consequently, any would-be global symmetry may automatically be shown to be a gauge symmetry as well.

The argument above only holds for the gauge symmetries that transform things nontrivially in the bulk of the world sheet. But even symmetries acting on the boundary degrees of freedom, i.e. the Chan-Paton factors, obey the same requirement because one may also construct (open string) vertex operators for the corresponding group that transform properly.

We don't have a universal non-perturbative definition of string theory but it's likely that the conclusion holds non-perturbatively, too.

In some moral sense, it holds for discrete symmetries as well even though discrete symmetries don't allow gauge bosons.

This post has been migrated from (A51.SE)
answered Nov 5, 2011 by Luboš Motl (10,278 points) [ no revision ]
Great answer! Can you add a few more word about the discrete case?

This post has been migrated from (A51.SE)
Thanks, @Squark, but I would prefer not to go to details in the discrete case because it could be inconclusive. One may show that discrete symmetries of various kinds are non-anomalous; and one must figure out what it means for the discrete symmetry to be local. An operational definition is that there has to be a cosmic string (codimension 2 brane in general) such that the monodromy around it is equivalent to any element of the discrete symmetry group. It seems to be satisfied; those cosmic strings exist.

This post has been migrated from (A51.SE)
Because they do, the domain walls that would separate environments $E$ and $g(E)$ where $g$ is any element of the discrete symmetry group are unstable: holes may start to grow (nucleate) in these domain walls - the boundary of the wall is nothing else than the cosmic string whose existence was advocated above. So ultimately the wall may disappear, proving that $E$ and $g(E)$ are really physically identical environments and the symmetry is a redundancy, not a symmetry acting on distinct objects. Of course, if symmetries change the asymptotic structure of spacetime, they always become physical.

This post has been migrated from (A51.SE)

Your answer

Please use answers only to (at least partly) answer questions. To comment, discuss, or ask for clarification, leave a comment instead.
To mask links under text, please type your text, highlight it, and click the "link" button. You can then enter your link URL.
Please consult the FAQ for as to how to format your post.
This is the answer box; if you want to write a comment instead, please use the 'add comment' button.
Live preview (may slow down editor)   Preview
Your name to display (optional):
Privacy: Your email address will only be used for sending these notifications.
Anti-spam verification:
If you are a human please identify the position of the character covered by the symbol $\varnothing$ in the following word:
Then drag the red bullet below over the corresponding character of our banner. When you drop it there, the bullet changes to green (on slow internet connections after a few seconds).
Please complete the anti-spam verification

user contributions licensed under cc by-sa 3.0 with attribution required

Your rights