Quantcast
  • Register
PhysicsOverflow is a next-generation academic platform for physicists and astronomers, including a community peer review system and a postgraduate-level discussion forum analogous to MathOverflow.

Welcome to PhysicsOverflow! PhysicsOverflow is an open platform for community peer review and graduate-level Physics discussion.

Please help promote PhysicsOverflow ads elsewhere if you like it.

News

New printer friendly PO pages!

Migration to Bielefeld University was successful!

Please vote for this year's PhysicsOverflow ads!

Please do help out in categorising submissions. Submit a paper to PhysicsOverflow!

... see more

Tools for paper authors

Submit paper
Claim Paper Authorship

Tools for SE users

Search User
Reclaim SE Account
Request Account Merger
Nativise imported posts
Claim post (deleted users)
Import SE post

Users whose questions have been imported from Physics Stack Exchange, Theoretical Physics Stack Exchange, or any other Stack Exchange site are kindly requested to reclaim their account and not to register as a new user.

Public \(\beta\) tools

Report a bug with a feature
Request a new functionality
404 page design
Send feedback

Attributions

(propose a free ad)

Site Statistics

180 submissions , 140 unreviewed
4,534 questions , 1,819 unanswered
5,159 answers , 21,954 comments
1,470 users with positive rep
720 active unimported users
More ...

  How long is the yarn in a large ball of yarn?

+ 0 like - 0 dislike
161 views

The image https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Ball_of_yarn_10.jpg shows a ball of yarn. The spherical ball has radius \(R\) and volume $4 \pi R ^3 /3 $. The yarn itself has radius \(r\).

How long will the yarn be on average? The length $L$ is surely smaller than $V/(\pi r^2)$. But I have no idea how to estimate an actual average length. Is there a way to do this?

asked Nov 12, 2019 in Mathematics by Yanni [ no revision ]
recategorized Nov 18, 2019 by dimension10

You want a probability distribution on the various ways of tying up yarn. I doubt that would be a very interesting calculation.

I find this VERY interesting. That is why I asked. I'd pay 50 Euros for the solution.

What way do you wire it exactly to get a quasi sphere?

Many  puzzles follow the option. Consider that R and the sphere scale but r is constant and that the poles must always drift.

Phisically speaking, it is not sure that the energy equilibrium coincide with the topological optimum choosen ; you can optimize for the speed the radius R grows, for the density or for the quasi-sphere quality.

Definitively a question for the Chat :)

Your answer

Please use answers only to (at least partly) answer questions. To comment, discuss, or ask for clarification, leave a comment instead.
To mask links under text, please type your text, highlight it, and click the "link" button. You can then enter your link URL.
Please consult the FAQ for as to how to format your post.
This is the answer box; if you want to write a comment instead, please use the 'add comment' button.
Live preview (may slow down editor)   Preview
Your name to display (optional):
Privacy: Your email address will only be used for sending these notifications.
Anti-spam verification:
If you are a human please identify the position of the character covered by the symbol $\varnothing$ in the following word:
p$\hbar$ysicsOverfl$\varnothing$w
Then drag the red bullet below over the corresponding character of our banner. When you drop it there, the bullet changes to green (on slow internet connections after a few seconds).
To avoid this verification in future, please log in or register.




user contributions licensed under cc by-sa 3.0 with attribution required

Your rights
...