Quantcast
  • Register
PhysicsOverflow is a next-generation academic platform for physicists and astronomers, including a community peer review system and a postgraduate-level discussion forum analogous to MathOverflow.

Welcome to PhysicsOverflow! PhysicsOverflow is an open platform for community peer review and graduate-level Physics discussion.

Please help promote PhysicsOverflow ads elsewhere if you like it.

News

New printer friendly PO pages!

Migration to Bielefeld University was successful!

Please vote for this year's PhysicsOverflow ads!

Please do help out in categorising submissions. Submit a paper to PhysicsOverflow!

... see more

Tools for paper authors

Submit paper
Claim Paper Authorship

Tools for SE users

Search User
Reclaim SE Account
Request Account Merger
Nativise imported posts
Claim post (deleted users)
Import SE post

Users whose questions have been imported from Physics Stack Exchange, Theoretical Physics Stack Exchange, or any other Stack Exchange site are kindly requested to reclaim their account and not to register as a new user.

Public \(\beta\) tools

Report a bug with a feature
Request a new functionality
404 page design
Send feedback

Attributions

(propose a free ad)

Site Statistics

178 submissions , 140 unreviewed
4,360 questions , 1,685 unanswered
5,107 answers , 21,712 comments
1,470 users with positive rep
651 active unimported users
More ...

  A Question about Wave-Function Renormalization Factor in SQCD

+ 3 like - 0 dislike
76 views

I have a question about the one-loop computation of the wave-function renormalization factor in SQCD. 

According to Seiberg duality, the following electric $\mathrm{SQCD}_{e}$ 

\begin{gather}
S_{e}(\mu)=\frac{1}{2g_{e}(\mu)^{2}}\left(\int d^{4}x\int d^{2}\theta\mathrm{Tr}(\mathbb{W^{\alpha}\mathbb{W}_{\alpha}})+\int d^{4}x\int d^{2}\bar{\theta}\mathrm{Tr}(\overline{\mathbb{W}}^{\dot{\alpha}}\overline{\mathbb{W}}_{\dot{\alpha}})\right)+ \\
+\frac{Z_{Q}(\Lambda_{e},\mu)}{4}\sum_{f=1}^{F}\int d^{4}x\int d^{2}\theta \int d^{2}\bar{\theta}\left(\widetilde{Q}^{\dagger}_{f}e^{V}\widetilde{Q}_{f}+Q^{\dagger}_{f}e^{-V}Q_{f}\right),
\end{gather}

with gauge group $SU(N)$ and $F$ flavors, is dual to the magnetic $\mathrm{SQCD}_{m}$

\begin{gather}
S_{m}(\mu)=\frac{1}{2g_{m}(\mu)^{2}}\left(\int d^{4}x\int d^{2}\theta\mathrm{Tr}(\mathbb{W^{\alpha}\mathbb{W}_{\alpha}})+\int d^{4}x\int d^{2}\bar{\theta}\mathrm{Tr}(\overline{\mathbb{W}}^{\dot{\alpha}}\overline{\mathbb{W}}_{\dot{\alpha}})\right)+ \\
+\frac{Z_{q}(\Lambda_{m},\mu)}{4}\sum_{f=1}^{F}\int d^{4}x\int d^{2}\theta \int d^{2}\bar{\theta}\left(\tilde{q}^{\dagger}_{f}e^{V}\tilde{q}_{f}+q^{\dagger}_{f}e^{-V}q_{f}\right)+ \\
+\frac{Z_{T}(\Lambda_{m},\mu)}{4}\int d^{4}x\int d^{2}\theta \int d^{2}\bar{\theta}T^{\dagger}T+ \\
+\lambda(\Lambda_{m})\left(\int d^{4}xd^{2}\theta\mathrm{tr}(qT\tilde{q})+\int d^{4}xd^{2}\bar{\theta}\mathrm{tr}(\tilde{q}^{\dagger}T^{\dagger}q^{\dagger})\right),
\end{gather}

with gauge group $SU(F-N)$ and $F$ flavors in the IR. 

In the above expressions, $\Lambda_{e}$ and $\Lambda_{m}$ are respectively the UV cutoffs, factors $Z_{Q}$, $Z_{q}$, and $Z_{T}$ are wave-function renormalization constants, $T$ in $\mathrm{SQCD}_{m}$ is an $SU(F-N)$-gauge singlet, and the trace $\mathrm{tr}$ is taken over both flavor and color indices. The Yukawa coupling constant $\lambda(\Lambda_{m})$ is independent of the scale $\mu$ because of the famous Non-Renormalization Theorem.

My questions are about the one-loop computation of the above wave-function renormalization constant.

In QCD, we know that in minimal-subtraction scheme the wave-function renormalization factor for the kinetic term of the fermion is given by

$$Z=1-C_{2}(R)\frac{g^{2}}{8\pi^{2}}\frac{1}{\epsilon}+\mathcal{O}(g^{4}),$$

where $C_{2}(R)$ is the second Casimir of the representation $R$ that the quark field is in. This can be found in many standard QFT textbooks such as Srednicki, equation (73.3).

In this paper, there is a similar formula (equation (7) on page 4) of the wave-function renormalization constant, 

$$Z_{Q}(\Lambda,\mu)=1+C_{2}(R)\frac{g^{2}}{4\pi^{2}}\log\frac{\mu}{\Lambda}+\mathcal{O}(g^{4}), \tag{7}$$

given in Wilsonian approach. 

1. Could you enlighten me how to derive equation (7) in Wilsonian approach?

2. Please also tell me how to derive equation (13) and (14) on page 6

\begin{align}
Z_{q}(\Lambda,\mu)&=1+\left(\frac{g^{2}}{4\pi^{2}}C_{2}(R)-\frac{\lambda^{2}}{8\pi^{2}}F\right)\log\frac{\mu}{\Lambda}+\mathcal{O}(g^{4},g^{2}\lambda^{2},\lambda^{4}), \tag{13} \\
Z_{T}(\Lambda,\mu)&=1-\frac{\lambda^{2}}{8\pi^{2}}(F-N)\log\frac{\mu}{\Lambda}+\mathcal{O}(g^{4},g^{2}\lambda^{2},\lambda^{4}), \tag{14}
\end{align}

for the magnetic dual theory.

My final question is a stupid one. As far as I could understand from what I read about Seiberg duality, the conjecture claims that in the conformal window 

$$\frac{3}{2}N<F<3N$$

both $\mathrm{SQCD}_{e}$ and $\mathrm{SQCD}_{m}$ are conformal and flow to the same IR fixed point. In $\mathrm{SQCD}_{e}$, the NSVZ $\beta$ function is given by 

\begin{align}
\beta(g_{e})&=-\frac{g_{e}^{3}}{16\pi^{2}}\frac{3N-F(1-\gamma(g_{e}))}{1-\frac{Ng^{2}_{e}}{8\pi^{2}}}, \\
\gamma(g_{e})&=-\frac{g_{e}^{2}}{8\pi^{2}}\frac{N^{2}-1}{N}+\mathcal{O}(g_{e}^{4}),
\end{align}

whose zero (Banks-Zaks Fixed Point) is at 

$$(g^{\ast}_{e})^{2}=\frac{8\pi^{2}}{3}\frac{N}{N^{2}-1}\epsilon,$$

when $F=3N-\epsilon N$ with small enough $\epsilon$. On the other hand, in the dual theory $\mathrm{SQCD}_{m}$, the paper shows that the dual Banks-Zaks fixed point is at (equation (15) and (16))

\begin{align}
\frac{(g_{m}^{\ast})^{2}}{8\pi^{2}}&=\epsilon\frac{F-N}{(F-N)^{2}-1}\left(1+2\frac{F}{F-N}\right), \tag{15} \\
\frac{(\lambda^{\ast})^{2}}{8\pi^{2}}&=2\epsilon\frac{1}{F-N}. \tag{16}
\end{align}

3. Since the Yukawa coupling constant $\lambda$ should not run along the RG flow, does the above fixed point $\lambda^{\ast}$ imply that one must tune $\lambda$ to $\lambda^{\ast}$ in the UV so that the theory flows to a fixed point in the IR?

4. Is Seiberg duality claiming that $g_{e}^{\ast}$ and $(g_{m}^{\ast},\lambda^{\ast})$ are actually the same point in the theory space?

Worrying that my question will have no answers, I also posted my question here.

asked Jul 14 in Theoretical Physics by New Student (270 points) [ revision history ]
edited Jul 15 by New Student

Your answer

Please use answers only to (at least partly) answer questions. To comment, discuss, or ask for clarification, leave a comment instead.
To mask links under text, please type your text, highlight it, and click the "link" button. You can then enter your link URL.
Please consult the FAQ for as to how to format your post.
This is the answer box; if you want to write a comment instead, please use the 'add comment' button.
Live preview (may slow down editor)   Preview
Your name to display (optional):
Privacy: Your email address will only be used for sending these notifications.
Anti-spam verification:
If you are a human please identify the position of the character covered by the symbol $\varnothing$ in the following word:
p$\varnothing$ysicsOverflow
Then drag the red bullet below over the corresponding character of our banner. When you drop it there, the bullet changes to green (on slow internet connections after a few seconds).
To avoid this verification in future, please log in or register.




user contributions licensed under cc by-sa 3.0 with attribution required

Your rights
...