# GSO (Gliozzi-Scherk-Olive) projection and its Mathematics?

+ 6 like - 0 dislike
304 views

GSO (Gliozzi-Scherk-Olive) projection is an ingredient used in constructing a consistent model in superstring theory. The projection is a selection of a subset of possible vertex operators in the worldsheet conformal field theory (CFT)—usually those with specific worldsheet fermion number and periodicity conditions. Such a projection is necessary to obtain a consistent worldsheet CFT.

For terminology, for a compact 1-manifold as a $$S^1$$ circle, there are two spin structures, let one be periodic or antiperiodic in going around the circle. In string theory, these are called

• Ramond (periodic)

• Neveu-Schwarz (antiperiodic)

of spin structures.

For the projection to be consistent, the set $$A$$ of operators retained by the projection must satisfy:

• Closure — The operator product expansion (OPE) of any two operators in $$A$$ contains only operators which are in $$A$$.

• Mutual locality — There are no branch cuts in the OPE of any two operators in the set $$A$$.

• Modular invariance — The partition function on the two-torus of the theory containing only the operators in $$A$$ respects modular invariance.

My naive question is that

Whether there is a mathematical branch highly relevant for formulating GSO (Gliozzi-Scherk-Olive) projection and determine the consistency of projection?

My guess is that the "Modular invariance," "Closure" and "Mutual locality" may have something to do with the symplectic geometry and Lagrangian submanifolds (of certain space). But I am not sure what is the precise mathematics to put these ideas together?

This post imported from StackExchange MathOverflow at 2019-07-09 21:58 (UTC), posted by SE-user wonderich
asked Nov 13, 2018
retagged Jul 9, 2019
For 1) are you asking for mathematical formulations of CFT a la conformal nets, Wasserman, Tener etc? 2) seems like it should be asked as a separate question.

This post imported from StackExchange MathOverflow at 2019-07-09 21:58 (UTC), posted by SE-user AHusain
Thanks - I follow your suggestion and ask a new one for the 2)nd part mathoverflow.net/q/315262/27004

This post imported from StackExchange MathOverflow at 2019-07-09 21:58 (UTC), posted by SE-user wonderich

 Please use answers only to (at least partly) answer questions. To comment, discuss, or ask for clarification, leave a comment instead. To mask links under text, please type your text, highlight it, and click the "link" button. You can then enter your link URL. Please consult the FAQ for as to how to format your post. This is the answer box; if you want to write a comment instead, please use the 'add comment' button. Live preview (may slow down editor)   Preview Your name to display (optional): Email me at this address if my answer is selected or commented on: Privacy: Your email address will only be used for sending these notifications. Anti-spam verification: If you are a human please identify the position of the character covered by the symbol $\varnothing$ in the following word:p$\hbar$ysics$\varnothing$verflowThen drag the red bullet below over the corresponding character of our banner. When you drop it there, the bullet changes to green (on slow internet connections after a few seconds). To avoid this verification in future, please log in or register.