In their book, ''Noncommutative Geometry, Quantum Fields and Motives,'' Alain Connes and Matilde Marcolli begin their preface by saying:

The unifying theme, which the reader will encounter in different guises throughout
the book, is the interplay between noncommutative geometry and number theory,
the latter especially in its manifestation through the theory of motives. For us, this
interwoven texture of noncommutative spaces and motives will become a tool in the
exploration of two spaces, whose role is central to many developments of modern
mathematics and physics:
² Space-time and
² The set of prime numbers.
One may be tempted to think that, looking from the vantage point of those who
sit atop the vast edifice of our accumulated knowledge of such topics as space and
numbers, we ought to know a great deal about these two spaces. However, there
are two fundamental problems whose difficulty is a clear reminder of our limited
knowledge, and whose solution would require a more sophisticated understanding
than the one currently within our immediate grasp:
² The construction of a theory of quantum gravity (QG) and
² The Riemann hypothesis (RH).
The purpose of this book is to explain the relevance of noncommutative geometry
(NCG) in dealing with these two problems. Quite surprisingly, in so doing we shall
discover that there are deep analogies between these two problems which, if properly exploited, are likely to enhance our grasp of both of them.

Can someone explain in the simplest possible terms what really the link between the RH and QG that Connes and Marcolli were talking about ?

This post imported from StackExchange MathOverflow at 2019-02-02 19:45 (UTC), posted by SE-user CuriousTatenda