• Register
PhysicsOverflow is a next-generation academic platform for physicists and astronomers, including a community peer review system and a postgraduate-level discussion forum analogous to MathOverflow.

Welcome to PhysicsOverflow! PhysicsOverflow is an open platform for community peer review and graduate-level Physics discussion.

Please help promote PhysicsOverflow ads elsewhere if you like it.


PO is now at the Physics Department of Bielefeld University!

New printer friendly PO pages!

Migration to Bielefeld University was successful!

Please vote for this year's PhysicsOverflow ads!

Please do help out in categorising submissions. Submit a paper to PhysicsOverflow!

... see more

Tools for paper authors

Submit paper
Claim Paper Authorship

Tools for SE users

Search User
Reclaim SE Account
Request Account Merger
Nativise imported posts
Claim post (deleted users)
Import SE post

Users whose questions have been imported from Physics Stack Exchange, Theoretical Physics Stack Exchange, or any other Stack Exchange site are kindly requested to reclaim their account and not to register as a new user.

Public \(\beta\) tools

Report a bug with a feature
Request a new functionality
404 page design
Send feedback


(propose a free ad)

Site Statistics

205 submissions , 163 unreviewed
5,064 questions , 2,215 unanswered
5,347 answers , 22,731 comments
1,470 users with positive rep
818 active unimported users
More ...

  Understanding the connection between Quantum Fisher Information and Correlation Functions

+ 1 like - 0 dislike

This is a port of a question I've asked on physics.se, but never got a response.

This question is regarding an article in Nature Physics discussing Quantum Fisher Information (QFI):


Frankly I have not been following Quantum Information for a number of years now, and have never heard of even classical Fisher information.

What I was surprised to see was that there is a connection between the QFI and an energy integral over a response function (e.g. Optical conductivity). I normally interpret response functions as correlations between operator expectation values (e.g. current-current correlations, spin-spin, etc.), and have not considered the possible connections to entanglement.

From the text, it seems that the Quantum Fisher Information is given by the total energy integral of the response function. What puzzles me is how this could possibly be useful, for example, the total integral of the optical conductivity will give some type of QFI, but because of the optical sum rule this integral always gives the number of charge carriers, making it a useless measure of any entanglement.

So I have the following questions:

  1. What is the motivation for defining (Q)FI the way it is?
  2. How do you interpret QFI, especially with regards to measuring entanglement?
  3. What kinds of dynamical correlation functions actually give useful measures of entanglement/QFI? The optical conductivity for example seems like it would be totally useless for example.
asked Mar 24, 2018 in Theoretical Physics by admin (5 points) [ no revision ]

Your answer

Please use answers only to (at least partly) answer questions. To comment, discuss, or ask for clarification, leave a comment instead.
To mask links under text, please type your text, highlight it, and click the "link" button. You can then enter your link URL.
Please consult the FAQ for as to how to format your post.
This is the answer box; if you want to write a comment instead, please use the 'add comment' button.
Live preview (may slow down editor)   Preview
Your name to display (optional):
Privacy: Your email address will only be used for sending these notifications.
Anti-spam verification:
If you are a human please identify the position of the character covered by the symbol $\varnothing$ in the following word:
Then drag the red bullet below over the corresponding character of our banner. When you drop it there, the bullet changes to green (on slow internet connections after a few seconds).
Please complete the anti-spam verification

user contributions licensed under cc by-sa 3.0 with attribution required

Your rights