• Register
PhysicsOverflow is a next-generation academic platform for physicists and astronomers, including a community peer review system and a postgraduate-level discussion forum analogous to MathOverflow.

Welcome to PhysicsOverflow! PhysicsOverflow is an open platform for community peer review and graduate-level Physics discussion.

Please help promote PhysicsOverflow ads elsewhere if you like it.


PO is now at the Physics Department of Bielefeld University!

New printer friendly PO pages!

Migration to Bielefeld University was successful!

Please vote for this year's PhysicsOverflow ads!

Please do help out in categorising submissions. Submit a paper to PhysicsOverflow!

... see more

Tools for paper authors

Submit paper
Claim Paper Authorship

Tools for SE users

Search User
Reclaim SE Account
Request Account Merger
Nativise imported posts
Claim post (deleted users)
Import SE post

Users whose questions have been imported from Physics Stack Exchange, Theoretical Physics Stack Exchange, or any other Stack Exchange site are kindly requested to reclaim their account and not to register as a new user.

Public \(\beta\) tools

Report a bug with a feature
Request a new functionality
404 page design
Send feedback


(propose a free ad)

Site Statistics

205 submissions , 163 unreviewed
5,054 questions , 2,207 unanswered
5,347 answers , 22,726 comments
1,470 users with positive rep
818 active unimported users
More ...

  Is there an easy way to know the covering group of $O(p,q)$ ?

+ 0 like - 0 dislike

I would like to know how to find the double cover of say $SO(2,4)$ All references say that it is $SU(2,2)$ Why not $SU(4)$ ? There is something still missing in my understanding. 

asked Feb 14, 2018 in Theoretical Physics by anonymous [ no revision ]
reshown Feb 15, 2018 by dimension10

Indeed, we should have Spin(2,4) = Spin(6) since Cl(2,4) = Cl(6). I must be missing something too.

I know that these clifford algebras don't match. I might be stupid but I wanted to know whether we can know this quickly from analogy with something like $SL(2,C)=SO(1,3)$ like may be try to find matrices living in SU or SL . Can you get confused reasoning about whether the right covering group of it $SU(1,3)$ or $SU(2.2)$ ? 

I think in principle the best approach will be to understand how to go from the Clifford algebra ( which is either a matrix algebra over R, C, or H or a sum of two matrix algebras:  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Classification_of_Clifford_algebras#Real_case ) to its group of units. I'm not sure how the Clifford norm appears in these matrix representations though.

Nevermind, I was briefly confused about centers. The center of SU(p,q) is always Z/p+q.

Your answer

Please use answers only to (at least partly) answer questions. To comment, discuss, or ask for clarification, leave a comment instead.
To mask links under text, please type your text, highlight it, and click the "link" button. You can then enter your link URL.
Please consult the FAQ for as to how to format your post.
This is the answer box; if you want to write a comment instead, please use the 'add comment' button.
Live preview (may slow down editor)   Preview
Your name to display (optional):
Privacy: Your email address will only be used for sending these notifications.
Anti-spam verification:
If you are a human please identify the position of the character covered by the symbol $\varnothing$ in the following word:
Then drag the red bullet below over the corresponding character of our banner. When you drop it there, the bullet changes to green (on slow internet connections after a few seconds).
Please complete the anti-spam verification

user contributions licensed under cc by-sa 3.0 with attribution required

Your rights