• Register
PhysicsOverflow is a next-generation academic platform for physicists and astronomers, including a community peer review system and a postgraduate-level discussion forum analogous to MathOverflow.

Welcome to PhysicsOverflow! PhysicsOverflow is an open platform for community peer review and graduate-level Physics discussion.

Please help promote PhysicsOverflow ads elsewhere if you like it.


PO is now at the Physics Department of Bielefeld University!

New printer friendly PO pages!

Migration to Bielefeld University was successful!

Please vote for this year's PhysicsOverflow ads!

Please do help out in categorising submissions. Submit a paper to PhysicsOverflow!

... see more

Tools for paper authors

Submit paper
Claim Paper Authorship

Tools for SE users

Search User
Reclaim SE Account
Request Account Merger
Nativise imported posts
Claim post (deleted users)
Import SE post

Users whose questions have been imported from Physics Stack Exchange, Theoretical Physics Stack Exchange, or any other Stack Exchange site are kindly requested to reclaim their account and not to register as a new user.

Public \(\beta\) tools

Report a bug with a feature
Request a new functionality
404 page design
Send feedback


(propose a free ad)

Site Statistics

205 submissions , 163 unreviewed
5,047 questions , 2,200 unanswered
5,345 answers , 22,709 comments
1,470 users with positive rep
816 active unimported users
More ...

  Representation theory of su(2)_k

+ 2 like - 0 dislike

I'm trying to understand the representation theory of the affine Lie algebra su(2) level k (which describe anyonic theories), which can be thought of as a deformation of the standard su(2) Lie algebra.

In particular, is there an analogous way of constructing the Hilbert space described by su(2)_k to that of su(2)? For the latter, one can start with a highest weight state, and repeatedly apply lowering operators to span the entire Hilbert space.

Hence, my question is: is there such a raising/lowering operator and what charge, if any, does it lower? 

asked Nov 30, 2017 in Mathematics by nervxxx [ no revision ]
recategorized Nov 30, 2017 by Dilaton

1 Answer

+ 2 like - 0 dislike

You can think of the representations of $SU(2)_k$ as decomposing the Hilbert space of the $SU(2)_k$ WZW CFT. The "highest weight vectors" are the conformal primaries, where the weight is minus the scaling dimension.

You can think of the current algebra objects $J^a_n$ as defining raising and lowering operators by $J^\pm_n :=J^1_n \pm i J^2_n$ just like in usual $SU(2)$ except now the charge can be carried by any mode of the string. We find $[J^3_m,J^\pm_n] = \pm J^{\pm}_{n+m}$ so $J^3_0$ can play the role of the weight.

answered Nov 30, 2017 by Ryan Thorngren (1,925 points) [ revision history ]

Your answer

Please use answers only to (at least partly) answer questions. To comment, discuss, or ask for clarification, leave a comment instead.
To mask links under text, please type your text, highlight it, and click the "link" button. You can then enter your link URL.
Please consult the FAQ for as to how to format your post.
This is the answer box; if you want to write a comment instead, please use the 'add comment' button.
Live preview (may slow down editor)   Preview
Your name to display (optional):
Privacy: Your email address will only be used for sending these notifications.
Anti-spam verification:
If you are a human please identify the position of the character covered by the symbol $\varnothing$ in the following word:
Then drag the red bullet below over the corresponding character of our banner. When you drop it there, the bullet changes to green (on slow internet connections after a few seconds).
Please complete the anti-spam verification

user contributions licensed under cc by-sa 3.0 with attribution required

Your rights