# Are there any non-physical eigenstates of interacting QFT?

+ 2 like - 0 dislike
212 views

While reading about the Källén-Lehmann representation I came across the definition of eigenstates in general QFT. As $\vec{p}$ (total momentum) and $H$ commute they can be simultaneously diagoalized, thus one obtains:
$$H | {\lambda_{\vec{p}}} \rangle = E_{\vec{p}} |{\lambda_{\vec{p}}} \rangle$$
$$\vec{p} |{\lambda_{\vec{p}}} \rangle = \vec{p} |{\lambda_{\vec{p}}} \rangle$$
Given a ket $|{\lambda_{\vec{0}}} \rangle$ one can go to all the kets $|{\lambda_{\vec{p}}} \rangle$ by a Loretz transformation. We can then partion the set of all possible eignestates grouping those which are related by a Loretz transformation and giving them the symbol $\lambda$ (as I have actually already done). We would expect physical states to have an invariant mass, so there should exist $m$ such that $m^2 =E_{\vec{p}} - \vec{p}^2$, but it doesn't seem obvious to me that all the eigenstates admit such a relation between eigenvalues. Do I have to sum up only on the physical states (if there is any that is non-physical) in the completeness relation?
$$\mathbb{1} = | \Omega \rangle \langle \Omega | + \sum_{\lambda}\frac{d^3 p}{(2 \pi)^3} \frac{1}{2 E_{\vec{p}}} |\lambda_{\vec{p}} \rangle \langle \lambda_{\vec{p}} |$$
Thus effectively defining the Hilbert space as the one generated by physical states?

The relevant Hilbert space in which to diagonalize the quantum field Hamiltonian and get a partially discrete spectrum is the space in which the system under consideration is in its rest frame; hence the spatial momentum vanishes. Then the discrete eigenvalues of H are the bound state masses $m$ (times $c^2$).
Extending the Hilbert space to arbitrary Lorentz frames then amounts to allowing eigenstates with arbitrary spatial momentum, obtained by an appropriate Lorentz transform, and this changes the energy $E$ to satisfy the relation $E^2=m^2+p^2$ (if $c=1$ or $E^2=(mc^2)^2+(cp)^2$ in arbitrary units. Thus each mass becomes a mass shell. Arbitrary states are then given by a momentum integral over spatial momentum of a sum over bound state masses, including an integral over the mass for the continuum part of the mass spectrum.
 Please use answers only to (at least partly) answer questions. To comment, discuss, or ask for clarification, leave a comment instead. To mask links under text, please type your text, highlight it, and click the "link" button. You can then enter your link URL. Please consult the FAQ for as to how to format your post. This is the answer box; if you want to write a comment instead, please use the 'add comment' button. Live preview (may slow down editor)   Preview Your name to display (optional): Email me at this address if my answer is selected or commented on: Privacy: Your email address will only be used for sending these notifications. Anti-spam verification: If you are a human please identify the position of the character covered by the symbol $\varnothing$ in the following word:p$\hbar$ysicsOve$\varnothing$flowThen drag the red bullet below over the corresponding character of our banner. When you drop it there, the bullet changes to green (on slow internet connections after a few seconds). To avoid this verification in future, please log in or register.